Milo Rose, blog entry - http://betweenthebards.org/blog/5296

COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION APPEAL

Now that I have established an internet presence outlining the miscarriage of justice I suffer. It is time for me to demonstrate how appealing to the court of public opinion will expeditiously exonerate me of any type of murder!

For over three decades the legal system has been collusively manipulated through suppressing the evidence of my innocence. Which I allege reveals evidence of racketeering by obstructing justice in order to conceal a larger pattern of criminal activity by a faction operating within Florida's legal community. How else can it be explained why in over three decades none of the five trial level attorneys involved with my case been ade to respond to the irreparable prejudice the wealth of withheld favorable evidence had on them to provide me with a fair and impartial trial?

Since I now have the ability to systematically file petitions before the court of public opinion to individually summons the five trial level attorneys involved with my case to come forward and respond to the irreparable prejudice the withheld favorable evidence had on them to provide me with a fair and impartial trial. I fully expect the influence exerted by the court of public opinion will bring about my expeditious exoneration of any type of murder!

I fully expect since it is a matter of record. All five trial level attorneys involved iwth my case, will hvae to repsond in accordance to the record.

The first thing they will have to agree with is that the evidence was presented as being overwhelming as to guilt.

The second thing I expect they will all agree with is that they had no knowledge favorable evidence disputing the

(1 - of - 2)

overwhelming evidence was withheld from them by a least two Clearwater, Florida police detectives.

The third thing I expect they will all agree with is that the withheld favorable evidence disputing what they were falsely lead to believe was undisputable evidence as to guilt. Prevented me from receiving a fair and impartial trial.

The fourth thing I expect them to all agree on is that I maintained my innocence, and the fact I stood midway through my trial to shout I was being railroaded turns out to be true. Due to the discovery of the withheld favorable evidence.

The fifth thing I expect them to agree and to act on is that the withholding of favorable evidence cannot be condoned and since they are now publically aware of the police misconduct of withhelding favorable evidence. Ethics now compels them to come forward to seek my expeditious exoreration!

I truly believe bringing these five trial level attorneys before the court of public opinion. will force the legal system to admit I was denied a fair and impartial trial, and therefore overturn the conviction and sentence that has kept me falsely imprisoned for over thirty years ...

Thank you, for your participation.

Milo Rose #090911
Union Correctional Institution
9819 NW 228th St P3225
Raiford, Florida 32026 9930

(2 - of - 2)