Oct. 4, 2021

Evidence that this was retaliation

by Ronald W. Clark, Jr (author's profile)

Transcription

Date: 9/22/2021 6:05:16 PM

"EVIDENCE THAT THIS WAS RETALIATION"
On September 7, 2021 there was a fight on the recreation yard. The fight continued for several minutes even after the officer yelled at them to break it up. Well an inmate finally stepped in between them and broke it up. Well this is a disciplinary report (DR) that carries the maximum of 30 days on disciplinary confinement (DC). This is the type of major rule violation that DC is designed for. Well this administration gave both of these inmates a verbal reprimand. What?! Well I'm actually glad they got this. I don't like seeing DC used at all. Because solitary confinement is extremely harmful. I'm addressing this for one reason and one reason only!! As most of you know I got a minor DR on July 8th. Not only did they make sure that I serve the full 10 day's on DC. I had served 7 on administrative confinement before going into their kangaroo court where they gave me 3 more days to make sure that I served that full ten. And then on top of this, they use a rule that's vague on visitation suspension, that seems to be designed for inmates who bring back tobacco products form the visiting park. But they use this to suspend my visit's, to not only harm me, but my family as well. And they say their not retaliating? Really? Do they think everyone is stupid? You can't not recognize that this is retaliation!!! The only person who could deny that this isn't retaliation is a deaf dumb and blind fool! Verbal reprimand for a major rule violation, and visitation suspension for a minor rule violation?!! Come on this isn't retaliation over my writing? Oh course it is! Hey I can't help it that they give me all this material to write about. Your officer's are out chasing prostitutes bringing them back to a hotel room rented by the FDOC where he paus her with his prescription drugs. And all of this while he's there to honor the families of these fallen officer's. I couldn't make this up if I wanted to! You would think the FDOC wouldn't even want the appearance of impropriety. Well they don't have an appearance here. No they've got a blatantly obvious case of reprisal!! They let the DR chairman respond to my grievance on issues that's against him!! He fails to apply the law that unequivocally states that they have to show that, "I. KNEW OF THE PRESENCE OF CONTRABAND IN THE LAUNDRY BAG AND HAD THE ABILITY TO MAINTAIN CONTROL OF IT!!" Well they didn't show that I knew it was there. And well the second prong maintaining control of it. Now you've got to be the stupidest person on this planet to say that I, a death row inmate in solitary confinement can maintain control of that laundry bag sitting here in a cage. And these people want to know why I write about them all the time. Because their stupidity is overwhelming!!! I pray for these people to have a grain of commonsense!! Much less a grain of compassion. No they give my mother some lame excuse that a blind man can see through. God have mercy!! And this is why I'm always battling for change. This is why they refuse to work with us. Oh well. Just wanted to vent and share this with you. All we can do is push forward and never give up. God bless you all.
Sincerely Ronald W. Clark Jr #812974
September 22, 2021

Favorite

Replies Replies feed

Comments disabled by author.

Other posts by this author

Subscribe

Get notifications when new letters or replies are posted!

Posts by Ronald W. Clark, Jr: RSS email me
Comments on “Evidence that this was retaliation”: RSS email me
Featured posts: RSS email me
All Between the Bars posts: RSS