Questioning Artificial Intelligence Use

I am representing myself and therefore I am an attorney and, I know - my case better than anybody else - it's being able to access an AI. program to do what I want to do that has been my problem - since everyone seems so adverse to the idea that AI., can help me as an advocate and authority of the law that will rule on my pro-se motion in accordance to the letter of the law - opening the questions of why these appointed to represent me ( the whole system ) failed to provide me with the zealous and diligent representation they swore an oath to provide me in order to protect the integrity of the Law - which is what they first and foremost represent ... Ask any attorney if they can or would condone withholding exculpatory evidence to obtain a conviction and the answer will be no -100% of the time - once the AI., points out that exculpatory evidence was withhold in my case - everyone involved in the suppression and oppression evidence that vindicates me of at kind of murder will have to answer the question Why? As I bring charges of them being racketeers ( organized criminals ) Since once more for the record - no one within the legal system can condone the withholding exculpatory evidence to obtain a conviction for any reason - with the fact that my whole case was based on fabricated evidence of guilt due to the withholding of exculpatory evidence and being carried over into the appellate process is all part of the record - with it also showing me jumping up midway through the farce and mockery of my trial to shout I was being railroaded - makes it more damning as to why the withheld exculpatory evidence been suppressed and oppressed throughout the appellate process !!! I agree to the layman, the law can be confusing- But I will address the American Bar Association with the evidence that points to racketeering and have it all on social media - to ... All of which will be used to bring about my immediate release !!!

I may be over optimistic or not - getting to the point of addressing the American Bar Association with the evidence of racketeering is the goal - adding to the record and forcing the legal system to uphold the integrity of the law in the light of the court of public opinion - based on the pro-sense motion, already part of the record ...