Oct. 9, 2016

Comment Response

by Pablo Piña (author's profile)
This post is in reply to comments on:  Thirty Plus Days In Ad-Seg. thumbnail
Thirty Plus Days In Ad-Seg.
(Aug. 23, 2014)

Transcription


October 3, 2016

Reply: M9FQ

Hello Van 1409,

ha, ha, ha, you know what this stuff reminds me of those science fiction movies the yay we're identified you know.
Anyways yes I will always answer, might take me a minute but only cuz I'm busy.
I've been having problems with the way they are running the program here denying us many rights, so I've been campaigning to get them on the right track. I finally got my property, but I'm missing a lot of stuff. All of my art Materials are gone. My radio the said it's broken, it wasn't when it was packed. So now I have to try and get reimbursed.
Okay on the SBI, they just came out wirh a new procedure about * months ago or maybe longer. Now they CDCR must prove that it was serious bodily injury. So if the victim was just given a black eye, bumps, bruises that is not SBI, it has to be broken bones or worse. If they can't prove that then hey must drop it to simple fight and can't give him a SHU term. If the give him D.A. referal he can file a motion in court 1381 deman for trial. They have to file charges or D.A. will reject it.
So he don't have to wait six months in Ad-Seg.

Favorite

Replies Replies feed

We will print and mail your reply by . Guidelines

Other posts by this author

Subscribe

Get notifications when new letters or replies are posted!

Posts by Pablo Piña: RSS email me
Comments on “Comment Response”: RSS email me
Featured posts: RSS email me
All Between the Bars posts: RSS