Reply ID: jpm7

Buhogrunon: ...maybe opinionated wasn't the right word. Sometimes I don't know if your beliefs are all screwed up, or you just down half a fifth of whiskey before you sit down and write this stuff...

Eh, either way, I do appreciate hearing from you, my Jewish Liberal, gay friend.

Yeah, I'll get off the Jewish trip as I think it's kicking a dead horse. Really, I got your letters mixed up and responded to your claim that they have never engaged in genocide with a few glaringly ugly facts in a response to another recent comment you left... just look that up and get back to me. Your other excuses are just plain wrong, about the Judenstat being forced into cooperation. All them groups weren't forced into helping Hitler, they helped him 'cause they believed in his plan, and were just as twisted as he was. You even had a ton of Jews fighting in his SS troops. Not just them, but you had whole regiments of different non-German nationalities fighting in the SS. Like the SS-Charlemagne was all Frenchmen... you had one made of all Swedes and Scandinavians, who were disgusted with the Commies and joined Hitler to fight them.

But you had a whole Arab/Muslim division, and even some Indians (like India Indians - not Native Americans). Eh, who cares. I wouldn't if the lies taught in schools didn't completely twist the facts around.

Hitler was a politician. If he was born in Uganda, he would've preached the eugenic ideology to the Ugandans and led them to try to create a master race...

You sure are sprung on Woody Allen. I'm not sure what kind of an authority he is that you quote his words verbatim to prove some type of point? Almost dogmatic with you. But hey, maybe you know this one. I'm going from memory like 5 years back so the words won't be right, but I remember the general gist of what he said. (You probably know the exact words!)

He said: "I wish I could believe but I can't. I'll tell you one thing that believers have that I don't, when I compare my life with theirs. They have hope. Their lives seem to be so much more fulfilling than mine does and they seem to derive a comfort in a belief in the afterlife. I wish I could believe, 'cause I know that I would be a whole lot happier if I did, but I can't simply believe in something solely 'cause I want it to be true."

You ever heard ole Woody say something like that? You seem to either have a super memory or a fast search engine to look up stuff to try and make me sound like an idiot, so either way, I'm sure you'll know what I'm talking about. Ha!

On to this other stuff. You don't seriously believe that the only differences between races are skin color, do you? So you would seriously believe that if two cadavers, one African and one European, were skinned and laid out on an autopsy table, that no doctor could prove what cadaver was which? There's a ton of differences. Read your "authority" Darwin. He wrote a book called The Descent of Man. But there are a ton of differences between races. Not just biological ones either, but even DNA hardwired behavioral characteristics. I mean, even from a secularist evolutionary viewpoint, this makes sense. It's one of the anomalies in your enlightened modernist worldview.

I'm guessing that you have a little bit of college, right? And you can remember something about the age old Nature vs. Nurture argument in your psychology classes? The well proven and documented fact of it is that DNA doesn't merely shape our physical characteristics but also the way we interact with people, our ambitions, our emotions, desires, etc... sexual impulses (gay, straight, highly active-promiscuous).

These genes are passed from parents to children. Families carry certain common traits. It's obvious. Tribes and clans are a little further removed but it's just an extended family. Nations and races are no different, just a little further down the line.

Here's a good old Atheist Scientist you may like. I like all his works, although he is at odds with the establishment on more than a few points and when he's gone I doubt we'll see another of his kind occupying any college chair. E.O. Wilson. Punch that up and see your liberal demagogues attack him! Ha! He's still brilliant!

But he has a way of explaining it. He calls it Gene-culture evolution theory. Say if in our culture way back in the day, we stoned to death all liars, we branched off and separated from a larger culture that did not stone all liars. Well, over thousands of years... whatever genes that cause that behavior would slowly be eliminated from the tribe that broke away and it would 'evolve' along those lines. Over time different cultures would have altered the evolutionary pathways of different cultures. Not just in killing off certain people that displayed certain characteristics... but even if a culture valued certain traits and those that embodied such traits were esteemed in that society and subsequently reproduced at a higher rate than the rest of that culture... in time whatever traits that were valued by that culture would begin to outnumber and dominate the rest. Sit down and think it out... it applies on about a million different levels.

Point is. There are differences between races. Seems like everyone gets that obvious principle except the idiot modern West. The Kurds in Iraq know they are unique. Eh, I could go nation by nation, but it's too obvious to even argue that each of these racial subgroups has unique strengths and weaknesses that set them apart from other groups of men. And the differences go way more than skin deep.

I can go into a black neighborhood in New York and one in California, and even though thousands of miles separate them and they have never met each other, they have more in common with how they live than they have in common with the Asian, Caucasian or Mexican neighborhoods they grew up around and live near. As do the Europeans in America, South Africa, Australia or the Americas... there's a whole bunch of differences.

I'm not making a superiority argument, just saying we are different, and to an extent we can control our direction. We can become better or worse... as can any people. Or we can all blend into one and destroy any uniqueness that we do possess now. But aside from Westerners, I don't think anyone else seems to have such a mass desire to surrender their uniqueness in the world by racial suicide. I could be wrong, but I doubt it.

Maybe you're right, that I look at things from my perspective that I have lived my life from, but... so do you! But I can see that I'm in the minority in my opinion, so it's not like I am blind to it. I have heard your perspective's argument, considered it, and just rejected it in the face of all I have seen and heard.

I know you will say I'm a racist for thinking like that. But I'm not. I have plenty of friends of different races, and don't think they are any less of a man than I am, or dispute that other cultures have made significant contributions to our common Human experience, I don't think they are stupid, weak, etc...

We have something here in America where we can swab the DNA out of our mouth and send it in and they send you a pie graph back that shows all the different ethnicities that make you... like 80% European, 20% Native American... but it even breaks it down further like 10% Cherokee Indian, 5% Comanche etc... I read an article that such tests were banned in France and declared illegal. Is that how the Secularists, the "middle grounders", the "non-extremists" express their viewpoints and beliefs? By outlawing any dissent? Tolerance... you are not the enlightenment!

Alright Woman, I'm gonna get off this typewriter for a while... take it easy over there!

Your friend,

Chris