Sept. 2, 2012

Interview Of An Innocent Man

From Prometheus Writes! by Nathaniel Lindell (author's profile)

Transcription

#77
Interview of An Innocent Man: Sean Riker
by Nate A. Lindell 19 August 2012

I first met Sean Riker W.D.O.C #567232 in June of this year, when he was put in a cell across from mine. I knew of him from another W.S.P.F prisoner I was helping with legal work. Sean looked...beat down, desperate, much like I might if I was in his shoes, serving 200-plus years for crimes including child rape, which he was innocent of. So, I was sympathetic, but due to my disgust for child-abusers, carefully scruntinizing everything about him before making any commitment to his cause. Eventually I had to conclude he's a straight-up guy in a horrible situation, meaning I had no choice but to help him get justice, freedom.
Feel free to make your own conclusions. Maybe this "interview" will help.

Q: How did you wind up being arrested; where did the arrest occur; what were you charged with?
I was a plant manager at a multimillion dollar glass factory in New Berlin, WI. on the 10th of November, 2004, I was pulling out of work and saw my SUV zoom by. I called my wife and asked if it was her. She said "No" and that she was at the computer store and on the was home in a few minutes.
I told her I was going home for lunch and that I wanted to play with the kids before I went back. She said "Ok."
I waited at the house for two hours. I looked out the window and saw the street was road blocked and S.W.A.T were peeking at my house covertly. I knew my wife had followed through with previous threats to fabricate charges against me.
I called my dad and told him what was up. He asked me what she told the cops. I assured him it was something minor, because i hadn't done anything wrong. We kept talking for 30 minutes white S.W.A.T. pestered me to come out. I told my dad I loved him, then exited my house.
S.W.A.T threw me to the ground, cuffed me, and took me to jail. Three days later I found out i was charged with four counts of mental harm to a child, four counts of child abuse, one count of strangulation (on my wife), one count of felon with a firearm, four counts of Endangering safety of a child, and two counts of 1st degree Sexual Assault.

Q: What was your reaction?
"Man, I should have left my wife when I had the chance.... I'll be out within 24 hours on bail and then i will leave her." My bail turned out to be one million dollars, cash.

Q: How did you react when you learned, what the charges were?
I was completely blown away! I was so mad!
There's no one who loves my children more than I do. To be falsely accused of such heinous crimes against them is a travesty.
I had never felt such hate for a human as I did (and do) for my wife at that time.

Q: How many children did you have?
I have four children, ages (then) 1 year, 2 years, 8 years & 9 years.

Q: How did you get along with your children?
My children and I were best friends and did everything together. On weekends we were camping, fishing, A.T.V.ing, bungee jumping, going to Disneyland, Circus Circus, rock climbing, etc.
My wife never went with us when we went camping.
My kids and I had a bond that they didn't have with their mother. When the kids got hurt playing, they would run around my wife's open arms and into mine for consolation. I was my kids' father, mother, friend, protector, and confidant.

Q: Do you still have contact with your children? If not, why?
I do not have contact with my children. The sentencing judge [i.e. Eugene A. Gasiorkiewicz ph. 262-636-3141] ordered me not to. I wrote to them every single day for two years prior to the court order.
Right after I was arrested, my wife sold all my assets and drained my bank accounts, including the childrens' college funds. Then she moved to Colorado, Fort Collins.
In the next seven months following my arrest, her neighbors called the police on her because she was savagely abusing my children. On the tenth police call, she was finally arrested for child abuse- the very charge she accused me of.
When she had a court hearing on her abuse case, the judge ordered that I be a "respondent" and have unlimited contact with my kids. That blissful communication went on for two years, until a crooked judge [i.e Gasiorkiewicz ph. 262-636-3141] in Racine, WI ordered no contact with my children.
F.Y.I, my four kids went to fosterhomes, because the abuse inflicted by my ex-wife was so bad.

Q: What evidence was presented against you?
Only my wife's words.
The day before I was arrested she alleged that i savagely beat all four of my children, bloody, and raped them. But, on the day of my arrest, the children had full-body exams and there was not one scratch or bruise on any of them. All of their hymens were intact. No semen or such on them or me.
There was absolutely zero evidence against me when there should have been an abundance, given the allegations. But that didn't stop the cops. I was dealing with the stupidest, most corrupt police agency I've ever seen.

Q: What evidence of your innocence did your attorney present?
What I was "allowed" to show was numerous forensic psychologists' testimony that the children were coached by their mother and their "mental harm" and "abuse" was caused by their mother's action, not mine.

Q: Were you prevented from presenting evidence that you or your attornies felt would have helped prove your innocence?
The evidence I was not allowed to show at trial was my ex-wife's savage abuse of my children, because "it was after the fact." And, two months after i was arrested. my ex-wife called the cops and said I'd been searching for child porn on the home computers. The computers were confiscated, and a forensics evaluation of them revealed that there was child porn on them, but it was downloaded after I had been arrested.
My wife had been trying to further set me up with heinous crimes. But I was not allowed to bring that up at my trial because "it was done after the fact and has nothing to do with [my] case."

Q: Do you feel the judge was fair or unfair to you? Why or Why not?
The judge was completely unfair to me at trial. He ruled against every objection we made and allowed cops and a "best friend" of the District Attorney to be on my jury. He also let on my jury a lady who had been savagely abused as a child and a crime reporter who was doing articles on my case.

Q: What help do you feel you need to obtain justice?
Unbiased media attention. The will expose the wrongfulness of my conviction and the corruptness of the judge, cops, and prosecutor.
I need help with computer searches for legal work, securing a good attorney who cares rather than one who's just appointed. I need a private investigator to document my ex-wife's criminal activities, past and current.

Q: If someone wants to help or has questions about your case, how can they contact you?
Anyone can write me at:
Sean Riker #567232
W.S.P.F P.O Box 9900
Boscobel, WI
53805-0901

They can learn more about my case, including viewing the reports of my expert witnesses, by going to these web-sites:
http:/www.seanrikerisinnocent.blogspot.com/2012/04/justice
http:/betweenthebars.org/blogs/5254/sean-riker/
http:/www.unjustjusticeseanriker.blogspot.com/2012/02/unjust-
www.prisoninmates.com/

Q: How was your experience in jail, before sentencing?
Jail staff treated me very bad. For almost two years I was on 24/7 lockdown. When i was able to shower, I had to do it in handcuffs, shackles on my feet, surrounded by the "riot crew". Never once was I allowed recreation or access to a T.V. Jail staff stripped my cell of a mirror, desk, chair, and lights, because "Riker will use them as weapons."

Q: How long did the jury deliberate before finding you guilty?
45 minutes.

Q: Did you attend sentencing?
No, for numerous reasons: a)they wanted to strap me in a Hannibal-Lector chair with a mask on my face when they wheeled me into court; b) I wouldn't let the court, cops or media see my reaction to such a ridiculous sentence, which I knew I'd receive; c) I didn't want to have to be driven to Racine (it was five hours away from the prison I was/am in) in full restraints, with a mask on my face, and a 50,000-volt stun belt painfully strapped to my leg; and finally, d) I didn't want to miss "America's funniest videos" and "Jeopardy" on T.V. that day. :)

Q: What was your sentence?
More than 200 years incarceration, then 70 years of extended supervision.

Q: Is there anything you'd like to say to your children?
I love them, miss them, and my heart aches for them every day, every second.

Q: Is there anything you would like to say to those who helped framed you?
If I get out of prison, you're in serious trouble. If I never get out of trouble, you're in serious trouble. I'm talking "legal trouble." I will never stop pursuing those who wrongfully imprisoned me and ripped my children from me. All of you are my life's mission.
Anyone reading this, write to me. Ask me anything. Google my name. I will hide Nothing. Just ask.

-end of interview-

And that's been my experience with Sean. Like me, he's a bad boy, but a good man. I've reviewed his case file and am baffled at his conviction- it's a travesty (a perverse representation) of justice. I hope this help real justice happen.

To my regular readers, now you might have an even better idea why I seem, sometimes, a "lazy blogger". Sean's situation, whihc includes several lawsuits, is but one of the despicable abuses perpetrated by people who weasled their way into power that I fight against, hard!
Help Sean, but please help me help people like Sean. YOU can do so in the ways I specify in my blog at:
http://writeaprisoner.com/inmate-Blogs/inmatesAllBlogs.aspx?f=z-303724
by "subscribing" to my blog here on BtB, and by telling others about this blog o' mine.
Best Wishes
Love to the Girlies :)
Nate.

P.S. My own mom, for her own reasons, told me & my siblings that her mother, father & siblings were baby-raping/killing Satanists.
I know this sounds absurd but, it didn't sound so when I was a boy. As i grew, I grew skeptical of my mom's tales whihc she did not like. But, I alwaya had... concerns about my aunts, uncles & grandparents, even wanted to hurt them. This kept us kids from our relatives, dependent on our mom.
When arrested for murder, aunts & uncles contacted me, finding me by the media reports. They were typical, decent, imperfect people. But, by then, I was damaged beyond repair, Apparently. Some mom's are "bad."

Favorite

Replies (177) Replies feed

slfreeman88 Posted 7 years, 11 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 10 months ago     1 Favorite
Loading
Thanks for writing and hope you get more people reading about this! I finished the transcription for your post.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 9 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 9 months ago   Favorite
FILED

United States Court of Appeals

Tenth Circuit

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS March 10, 2009

Elisabeth A. Shumaker

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Clerk of Court

SEAN RIKER,

Plaintiff,

v. No. 08-1123

(D.C. No. 1:05-cv-01178-MSK)

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; (D. Colo.)

HARLEY LAPPIN, Director, Federal

Bureau of Prisons; RAY HOLT,

Director, Southeast Region Federal

Bureau of Prisons,

Defendants-Appellees.

MARK JORDAN,

Party-in-Interest-

Appellant.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before MURPHY, McKAY, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 9 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 9 months ago   Favorite
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined

unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of

this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is

therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. This order and judgment is

not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata,

and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value

consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.

Mark Jordan, a federal prisoner proceeding pro se, appeals from the district court's partial denial of his motion to unseal documents in Colorado district court case No. 05-cv-01178-MSK, Riker v. Federal Bureau of Prisons. Mr. Jordan argues that the district court (1) abused its discretion in denying his common-law right of access to the documents and (2) erred in failing to assess his right of access under the First Amendment. We affirm.

BACKGROUND In June 2005, Sean Riker, who was a federal prisoner at that time, filed a civil action in district court asserting that he was in imminent danger of harm from other prisoners. Defendants, the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) and two BOP directors, 1 moved for expedited sealing of Mr. Riker's complaint, documents #2 and #4, and his motion for expedited ruling on the complaint, document #9. The district court preliminarily sealed the documents, which the court found appeared to contain information of a sensitive nature, pending a determination of the BOP's motion to seal. In October, the district court granted the parties' stipulated motion to dismiss the case with prejudice.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 9 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 9 months ago   Favorite
Nearly two years later, Mr. Jordan moved to unseal the documents so that he could use them to prepare a post-conviction motion with respect to his conviction for murdering an inmate. See United States v. Jordan, 485 F.3d 1214, 1219-24 (10th Cir.) (affirming murder conviction, upholding district court's 1 We refer to the defendants collectively as the BOP.

- decision to exclude evidence allegedly showing that Mr. Riker committed that murder, and concluding that even if court should not have excluded evidence, it was harmless error to do so), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 636 (2007). Mr. Jordan asserted that he was wrongly convicted and that although Mr. Riker provided statements to the FBI and testified for the government before the grand jury identifying Mr. Jordan as the murderer, Mr. Riker actually committed the murder.

Mr. Jordan contended that the government failed to notify him before his trial of Mr. Riker's filings in No. 05-cv-01178-MSK and that the sealed documents may be evidence or could lead to evidence that would support his post-conviction motion. Mr. Jordan asserted that any need to seal the documents had ended because Mr. Riker himself had acknowledged that his informant status is known at every federal prison and because Mr. Riker has been released from prison.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 9 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 9 months ago   Favorite
The district court granted Mr. Jordan's request that document #9, the motion for expedited ruling, be unsealed, but denied his request that #2 and #4, the complaint documents, be unsealed. Recognizing a common-law right of access to judicial records, the court found that the public interest in accessing the documents was fairly weak because the court had never actually considered them in making a substantive ruling as Mr. Riker's case was resolved without judicial intervention. With respect to the BOP's interest in keeping the information private, the court found that the sealed information was of a sensitive nature, that Mr. Riker confessed in a public document that he was an informant thereby - potentially exposing himself to a risk of physical harm, and that the basis for sealing, Mr. Riker's belief that he was in imminent danger, may continue even though he has been released from custody. Weighing the fairly weak public interest in unsealing the two documents against the interests of Mr. Riker and the BOP in keeping the documents sealed, the court concluded that there was compelling cause to continue to seal the documents. Mr. Jordan appealed.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 9 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 9 months ago   Favorite
ANALYSIS I. Common-Law Right of Access Mr. Jordan argues that the district court abused its discretion in denying his common-law right of access to the sealed documents. He maintains the district court failed to give proper weight to his interests and the interests of the public, wrongly assuming that the public right of access is weak. Instead, he contends that the common-law right of access applies categorically to all judicial records and documents, regardless of whether the district court considered the documents in reaching a substantive ruling. Mr. Jordan also argues that the district court engaged in inappropriate fact finding, premised its decision on conclusory fears and speculative risks, improperly advocated the BOP's position, and failed to assign the burden of proof to the BOP. Further, he argues the court failed to apply the proper legal standards in its balancing analysis because the court failed to presume the public interest was paramount and did not apply the compelling reasons standard. We reject these arguments.

- "Whether judicial records . . . should be sealed . . . is a matter left to the sound discretion of the district court." Mann v. Boatright, 477 F.3d 1140, 1149 (10th Cir. 2007). We will reverse a district court's order to seal documents only if "we have a definite and firm conviction that [the court] made a clear error of judgment or exceeded the bounds of permissible choice in the circumstances." Id.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 9 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 9 months ago   Favorite
"Courts have long recognized a common-law right of access to judicial records." Id. (citing Nixon v. Warner Commc'ns, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978)).

"The right is an important aspect of the overriding concern with preserving the integrity of the law enforcement and judicial processes." United States v. Hickey, 767 F.2d 705, 708 (10th Cir. 1985); see also FTC v. Standard Fin. Mgmt. Corp., 830 F.2d 404, 410 (1st Cir. 1987) ("The appropriateness of making court files accessible is accentuated in cases where the government is a party: in such circumstances, the public's right to know what the executive branch is about coalesces with the concomitant right of the citizenry to appraise the judicial branch."). But this right of access is not absolute; it can be rebutted when other interests outweigh the public interests in access. Mann, 477 F.3d at 1149. "All courts have supervisory powers over their own records and files. Thus a court, in its discretion, may seal documents if the public's right of access is outweighed by competing interests." Hickey, 767 F.2d at 708 (citations and quotation marks omitted). "The party seeking to overcome the presumption [of access] bears the - burden of showing some significant interest that outweighs the presumption." Mann, 477 F.3d at 1149 (quotation marks omitted). Whether a trial court exercises sound discretion will be based on the facts and circumstances of the individual case and the weighing of the parties' interests. See Hickey, 767 F.2d at 708.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 9 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 9 months ago   Favorite
Like the district court, we first consider the public's interest in the documents. "[J]udicial records are public documents almost by definition, and the public is entitled to access by default." Kamakana v. City & County of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1180 (9th Cir. 2006). Especially "where documents are used to determine litigants' substantive legal rights, a strong presumption of access attaches." Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 121 (2d Cir. 2006); see also Standard Fin. Mgmt. Corp., 830 F.2d at 409 ("[R]elevant documents which are submitted to, and accepted by, a court of competent jurisdiction in the course of adjudicatory proceedings, become documents to which the presumption of public access applies[.]"). On the other hand, where the documents "play only a negligible role in the performance of Article III duties, the weight of the presumption is low and amounts to little more than a prediction of public access absent a countervailing reason." Lugosch, 435 F.3d at 121 (quotation marks omitted).

The complaint documents at issue here are the type that are generally made available for public access. But these documents had little to do with the district - court's exercise of judicial power, as the court considered the documents only to determine whether to seal them. No further adjudication occurred. Thus, the district court correctly determined that the public's interest in access to the documents is weak.

Next, the district court correctly recognized that the BOP articulated a competing interest to the right to public access: the need to protect Mr. Riker's safety. Although Mr. Jordan criticizes the BOP and the district court for stating this interest in only conclusory terms, the sensitive nature of the sealed documents warrants the conclusory treatment.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 9 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 9 months ago   Favorite
After acknowledging both sides' interests, the district court then correctly balanced the public's interest in access against the interest of ensuring Mr. Riker's safety. The nature and degree of the potential injury to Mr. Riker could be quite significant. See United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1051 (2d Cir. 1995). Thus, as the district court found, the BOP met its burden of showing a significant interest that outweighed the presumption of access. See Mann, 477 F.3d at 1149.

We therefore conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion in concluding there was a compelling reason to continue to seal the two documents.

Mr. Jordan's "generalized claim that the file might contain helpful matter does not outweigh the government's justifiable concern with safety." Hickey, 767 F.2d at 709. Furthermore, our review of the sealed documents leads us to the - conclusion that there is nothing in them raising a reasonable doubt about Mr. Jordan's guilt. And Mr. Jordan is clearly aware of Mr. Riker's FBI statements and grand jury testimony.

II. First Amendment Right to Access Mr. Jordan next argues that the district court erred in failing to assess his right to access under the First Amendment. The BOP counters that Mr. Jordan failed to argue in district court that he has a First Amendment right of access to Mr. Riker's complaint, and he therefore cannot raise this argument for the first time on appeal. We recognize that Mr. Jordan did not expressly raise a First Amendment argument in district court, but he did cite to Globe Newspaper Co. v.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 9 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 9 months ago   Favorite
Superior Court for Norfolk County, 457 U.S. 596, 603-04 (1982), which reaffirms the First Amendment right of access to criminal trials. Liberally construing Mr. Jordan's district court filings as raising a First Amendment claim, we proceed to consider this claim. See Ledbetter v. City of Topeka, 318 F.3d 1183, 1187 (10th Cir. 2003) (construing pro se pleadings liberally).

The Supreme Court has not yet ruled that there is a constitutional right to access court documents. See United States v. Gonzales, 150 F.3d 1246, 1256 (10th Cir. 1998); United States v. McVeigh, 119 F.3d 806, 812 (10th Cir. 1997).

Even assuming, without deciding, that there is a First Amendment right to court documents, that right is not absolute. See Globe Newspaper, 457 U.S. at 606.

"Where . . . the State attempts to deny the right of access in order to inhibit the - disclosure of sensitive information, it must be shown that the denial is necessitated by a compelling government interest, and is narrowly tailored to serve that interest." Id. at 606-07. Applying this test, we conclude, as a matter of law, based upon our prior discussion, that any interest Mr. Jordan has is outweighed by the safety needs of Mr. Riker. Accordingly, Mr. Jordan cannot obtain access to the sealed documents.

PENDING MOTIONS Mr. Jordan attached to his reply brief a five-page document that had not been part of the district court record. The BOP moved to strike the attachment.

Mr. Jordan then moved to supplement the record on appeal, a motion the BOP opposes.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 9 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 9 months ago   Favorite
Rule 10(e) allows a party to supplement the record on appeal but does not grant a license to build a new record.

United States v. Kennedy, 225 F.3d 1187, 1191 (10th Cir. 2000) (citations and quotation marks omitted). Because this document was not before the district court, Rule 10(e) does not permit supplementing the record. Nor is this a case where we will exercise our inherent equitable power to allow Mr. Jordan to supplement the record. See id. at 1192. CONCLUSION The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The BOP's motion to strike is GRANTED, and Mr. Jordan's motion to supplement the record is DENIED. We remind Mr. Jordan that he must continue to make partial payments until the entire filing fee has been paid.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 9 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 9 months ago   Favorite
Mr. Riker himself had acknowledged that his informant status is known at every federal prison and because Mr. Riker has been released from prison.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 9 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 9 months ago   Favorite
Sean Riker talks with his attorney, Laura Sette, before he is ordered held on $1 million bond at his initial appearance in Racine County Circuit Court, Thursday November 12, 2009. Riker was arrested Tuesday after a standoff with Racine County Sheriff's deputies at his home in the town of Norway. He was previously convicted of 1995 pipe bombings in St. George, Utah, and served a federal prison sentence. Sette, a pubic defender, told the court commissioner after the hearing that Riker does not qualify for representation by the public defenders' office. / Mark Hertzberg mhertzberg@journaltimes.com

Stand off - not Sean coming out and surrendering.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 9 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 9 months ago   Favorite
Sean Riker is innocent





No posts. No posts.
Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom) Followers


About Me

seanrikerisinnocent View my complete profile

NO POSTS - Where is the transcrips you say you have?

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 9 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 9 months ago   Favorite
If only your wife's words were used against you at court why does your current Prison Inmates online profile say that new DNA evidence
proves your innocence? Which is it? Was there DNA evidence that convicted you or not? People don't get 200 years for just a bitter
spouses words! And your "numerous" experts who testified that your wife forced the kids to lie is also a life! You had ONE expert testify. And this man was hired and he works as a
university professor and does this "testimony" on the side for extra money. He NEVER spoke to any of the children or the wife. He gave a general commentary that the kids COULD have
been influenced. NOT that they were influenced because he can't PROVE that. Only that they COULD have been. Well, Unicorns COULD exists. So take that "expert" testimony for what it is - trash
and like the jury decided it wasn't good enough to overcome all of the other EVIDENCE. Yes, REAL evidence. You had full opportunity to show whatever you wanted to PROVE your innocence. You had nothing
which is why nothing was shown. You continue to say you are going to upload proof of your innocence to your websites but in three years you HAVE NOT! The only "evidence" you put on those sites is deperate
women who love you and support you writing things such as your ex-wife is a cunt and a liar. That is NOT evidence of your innocence! You were convicted of SEXUAL ASSAULT. Stop lying on your websites saying
you are in prison for escape and assault. You are not putting all the crimes down! 1st degree sexual assault does not nessesarily mean
RAPE. You were not charged with rape. You were charged with sexual assault and CONVICTED. Stop trying to confuse people who do not know legal jargon into thinking you were wrongfully accused.


Nathan Lindell,
You were not there during the marriage. You DO NOT KNOW what happened. Tayler and Sean know what happened. Sean has every reason
to lie. This was an all or nothing situation for him. Fighting until the death is the only option for him. Who would admit to being
a sex offender? What if Sean is lying? How would you feel then that you were fooled by him and that you helped him continue to tormet his
wife and children who are VICTIMS? Stay out of this because it has nothing to do with you. Question everything Sean tells you.
He is a master liar and manipulator. And stop posting this for him and giving him a platform to continue his lies. Ask Sean why he
deleted his own Between the bars blog? Why? Because he doesn't like the things that were posted in response. Ask Sean about his involvement
as a FBI informant with the Mark Jordan / David Stone case?

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 9 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 9 months ago   Favorite
Sean's newest online penpal website:

I’ve been serving a 200 years for crimes I’m 100% innocent of. I was prosecuted, persecuted and vilified for the worst crimes imaginable. Through newly obtained DNA evidence that proves my innocence and the recantation of the star “witness”, I will be set free. I have no idea how long until I get out. The filling of the motions and the waiting period in the courts could take a while. BUT I’M GETTING OUT!!! ☺ My legal team has already been contacted regarding a settlement for my wrongful conviction. I will be on easy street at the end of this ordeal. I’m so excited I could explode.

I never thought I would experience love again but now I know I will. Through this web-site I hope to find my soul mate and someone to grow old with. I’m a non-smoker, non-druggie and non-drinker…

I’m looking for someone with intelligence, a sense of humor, manners, great hygienic values, and a great personality. Are you out there???

I do not care about looks, race or size. If you seen my ex-wife you’d know this to be true. God gave her a high-five. In the face. With his staff. Repeatedly ☺. Animosity, definitely. She’s the lying so and so that put me in here with lies. Soon she and I will be trading places.

When I get out I will be a boisterous advocate for the wrongfully convicted and strive to imprison perjurus trailer trash.

Any way, I have young children and they will be with me. We’re a packaged deal. You will love them.

I also seek friends of all kinds but I am straight. Sorry fella’s ☺

I believe true beauty comes from the inside. I am not a shallow person and will not judge you for your looks (unless you have me wrongfully imprisoned ☺)

Please write

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 9 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 9 months ago   Favorite
RACINE — A state appellate court decision this week upheld an almost 2-year-old Racine County conviction against a man for damaging the Racine County Jail when he broke out of his cell and went on a rampage.

The three-judge panel issued its decision on Wednesday, affirming former Wind Lake resident Sean A. Riker’s November 2010 conviction for busting up the jail. He broke out of his cell in a 24-hour lockdown segregation unit on Jan. 6, 2010, by repeatedly pounding on the door until it became dislodged.

According to an appellate court filing, Riker contended that an inmate threw fermented feces mingled with urine at the base of his cell door that morning. He said the mixture splashed him in the face and mouth and argued he had to break out of his cell because he didn’t have access to towels, water or a shower.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 9 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 9 months ago   Favorite
“We conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit for appeal,” the judges wrote in the eight-page opinion.

The opinion, obtained Friday afternoon by The Journal Times, says that Riker’s account couldn’t be confirmed by his attorney or the appellate court.

“Appellate counsel indicates that she investigated the matter and found nothing to corroborate Riker’s claim of a biohazard attack” that day, the judges wrote.

Riker — an alleged member of the Aryan Brotherhood — contended that because of his opinions about minorities, he was the target of “rampant and ongoing” abuse from other inmates.

Riker remains in the Wisconsin Secure Program Facility in Boscobel. He sought late last year to have his conviction in this case overturned.

Appellate court records show the judges also decided Riker’s defense attorney, Urszula Tempska, no longer has to represent him.


****Please tell me that this isn't the same attorney who is supposedly in contacts with getting you a huge cash reward for your wrongful conviction? I'm sure it's all just a misunderstanding.

angeleyes Posted 7 years, 9 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 9 months ago   Favorite
whoeveryouwantmetobe,
YOU do not tell the full story or the full truth! Tayler should of done more a long time ago to protect her kids if Sean really was the kind of person she said he is. She knew when he was in Federal Prison what he was in for & yet still got with him, married him, and had kids with him. Sean has 3 older kids that live on the west coast and there is proof he was & is a great father to them. Tayler IS a liar!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! TAke it from someone who was married to Sean & has kids with him and knows the REAL truth about Sean Riker!

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 9 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 9 months ago   Favorite
Where is the proof Sean is/was a great father to his TWO other kids on the west coast? Because Sean says that his letters were thrown away by the boys' mother and he had no contact with them. And if he was in prison from them being toddlers to young adults how could he possibly have been a great father to them? Show proof or go away.
Yeah, everybody has got it wrong. Sean committed pipe bombings in Utah, Sean was a member of the NLR in prison and has an extensive and violent prison history, Sean was convicted in 1991 for inflicting corporal punishment on a spouse out of CA, Sean committed several crimes in Utah including rammig a forklift through the side of this workplace building and stealing all of the employee Christmas bonus checks, stealing quarters from car washes, stealing mail from USPS locations and the list goes on. Yeah, Sean is just always at the wrong place at the wrong time and everybody who thinks he actually is a monster just doesn't "know" him enough.
How do you know Sean? Are you Christina? Why did you leave him? Why didn't you let the boys visit him in prison? Why did your mother think Sean was the devil? Give me a fucking break. Where were you the last 15 years of his life and since 2006 when he was with his other wife. You never once visited him when he was in Utah or Wisconsin. He may have been one way (violent still apparently) in the late 80's early 90's and after 12 years in federal max prisons he came out another way. His ex was 22 when she met him, stupid - sure, but knew that she would be beat almost daily and have her kids abused - hell no! And considering it takes a fucking dozen deputies with half of them in full fucking riot gear to get Sean into court what exactly was his ex wife suppose to do to proect herself and her kids from Sean's rage? One woman against Sean in private vs. 12 cops in riot gear against Sean. You are stupid.
Show me your proof bitch, because there was all of his ex's proof at court and he DID get convicted. You can't "KNOW" anything about things that you were NOT there to witness. You "think" you know but you DO NOT KNOW. I hope your God judges you harshly for defending a monster.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 9 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 9 months ago   Favorite
Sean is a proven liar. His PrisonInmates pen pal ad says he is getting out of prison soon because of new DNA evidence. But on here and most other places he says he was convicted on nothing other than his ex-wife's words. Explain the contradiction.
Explain why Sean took his own Between the Bars blog down?
Explain why Sean Riker was and FBI informant for a prison murder?
Explain why Sean loses all of his court motions against his ex-wife, the Racine Co. Jail, the WI DOC and anything else he files. He hasn't won one yet.
Explain why he had to have a special cell at the jail and be taken into court like hanibal lector?
Explain why he spent all his time in Maximum security prisons?
Explain his ourburst at the judge and prosecutors when he cursed them all, threatened to kill them and actually had their addresses in his cell?
Did you see the video of Sean at court screaming at the judge? Because I guess you haven't seen Sean in almost two decades. How do you see this and say he's innocent of everything and just the nicest guy ever http://www.journaltimes.com/news/local/video---sean-riker-outburst-leads-to-his-removal/vmix_f96b97d2-3e50-11e1-a30f-0019bb2963f4.html
If you have proof that his ex-wife lied then post it here. I'd love to see it. Prove what you say. I can post my stuff all day long to show what kind of person Sean is.

angeleyes Posted 7 years, 9 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 9 months ago   Favorite
Bitch you lie too so don't even try to put everything on Sean. There is a police report showing you was arrested for child abuse AFTER Sean was already locked up. And why was your kids taken away from you & put in foster homes????

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 9 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 9 months ago   Favorite
Her kids are not in foster homes. They live with her. Why would they be returned after 3 days if there was real abuse. Having a misd. child neglect charge on her does not mean Sean is innocent. Does she have to be taken into court with a stun gun on her waist? Why is the county she lives in happy with her and her efforts. What proof do you have that she lied? And lied about what? And you did not answer any of the above questions. Is Sean innocent and not violent? Prove it. Because all I posted shows he is a monster. Calling someone a bitch doe not prove his innocence. Get real. Let me guess this is the fat bitch in Oregon who wishes she was not half ass related to Sean so she could be with him. The one who Sean said he walked in on while his father, step mother and step sister were all having sexual relations. Sean tked shit about you during the whole marriage. Convienent now that he loves you since he needs commisary money and someone to defend him online. Put up proof or go away. Sean did beat his wife and kids bloodly, all the time and you were not there. So stay the fuck out of it.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 9 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 9 months ago   Favorite
Do you defend your step dad too. The one who lost his business in california and had to move to Oregon from family pressure for his own sexual relations with underage girls. The one who does not have acomputer or internet access because of his child porn addiction. You and your mother are both good at defending sick men. Ask Sean to show you the letter that says the county has no concerns about his ex wife and believes she is a good mother. After three years of invovlement they say that. If you broke down bitches think you can get the best of this keep on going. I have years of family secrets to shame you all with. Sean ruined lives and you defend him. I will post forever showing what Sean does to lie.
Nathan, did Sean tell you he was a federal prison snitch in protective custody? Bet not. What do you think of him now. Want to keep defending him as some type of honorable man. Why did Sean motion the courts a month ago asking that the murder case be sealed because he was in danger in WI prison if that info got out. Why did he take his blog down? Because I said the federal prison has no tv and that is where he is going soon. You like WI prison Sean and being the "lord of the losers" wait till you get back in the feds. Your cake walk ride will he over.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 9 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 9 months ago   Favorite
Ask Sean if he ever said his older two boys meant nothing to him. Ask him if he said he would not speak to the oldest again because he did not say thank you for some gift Sean gave him. Ask Sean if he said he does not even know his kids and that they are nothing more than fat ulazy mexicans. Ask him. And when he "swears" to you he did not say those things then he will have lied once again. He did say those things.

sweetpea Posted 7 years, 9 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 9 months ago   Favorite
You talk about Sean's dad. Is that why there are pictures of the kids with him? I mean really if he did what you say he did then why did you let your kids be around him? Also, I seen the family video that was made when you guys were moving from Utah to Wisconsin. You said Sean abused you guys for 3 years yet in the video it shows you driving the Uhaul truck alone & Sean driving another vehicle with all the kids in it with him. You didn't seem to be to conserned for their safety then. Plus in the video everyone seemd happy & the children didn't show any fear of Sean. There are photo's of his 2 oldest boys that came to visit him while you guys were living in Wisconsin so that proves that their mom DID let them around Sean. Sean does have 3 oldre kids that live on the west coast. You were married to him you should know this. He has 2 older boys and an older daughter then 2 kids with you & the 2 step daughters. If Sean really did do all these things to you & the kids why did you wait so long to report it & why didn't you do something about it before you guys drove all the way from Utah to Wisconsin? Also, I spoke with Sean's lawyer & they told me the only reason he got convicted was because what the children said in court matched what was said in the home videos & that was the ONLY thing they had to convict him on. I am being serious. That is what I was told & I was also told that everyone on the jury stand hated you & him both. Him because of his past & you because of not doing more to protect your kids sooner. Sean has kids by 3 different women & you are the only one to ever report the things you accused him of. Also,there is proof (from what I was told) that you were writing to Sean & sending him pictures of the kids while he was in the county jail AFTER you had him arrested on all these charges. Then there is proof that this is not the first time you had him locked up. You had him arrested before in the past & then turned around & told the judge you lied just to get Sean out of the house or whatever. So when I hear all this stuff it makes me wonder if you really are being honest about the things you accuse Sean of. Then ofcourse there is the fact that you was arrested over child abuse yourself & your kids were sent to foster homes & this was after Sean was already locked up. Why in the world would you write to & send pictures of the kids to a man you call a monster?? None of this makes any sense. And I have seen women that get mad at their husbands, ex husbands, boyfriends, etc. and tell some big crazy lie and get them arrested & sent to jail with very little proof. For all the things you claim on Sean there should of been more proof than what there was.

Nathaniel Lindell Posted 7 years, 9 months ago.   Favorite
(scanned reply – view as blog post)

Nathaniel Lindell Posted 7 years, 8 months ago.   Favorite
(scanned reply – view as blog post)

Nathaniel Lindell Posted 7 years, 8 months ago.   Favorite
(scanned reply – view as blog post)

Nathaniel Lindell Posted 7 years, 8 months ago.   Favorite
(scanned reply – view as blog post)

Azazel_Iblis Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
If there is any intelligence into this blog I ran Accross, it would have to be the smallest bit of intelligence that a retarded inbred anal worm would have on a bad day. Because I happen to have lived with this Sodamite slice of hell you call innocent. This Inmate soon to be a Dead Inmate After Satin has had his fun with him has led a life of cruel destructive hurtful satanic episodes. In Utah is where this Scum Started his deal with the devil, by blowing up pipe bombs and getting high on the Meth. one bomb was at a school, he is just lucky that his deal with devil was just beginning or he woiuld of killed someone and he could not of done what he had done to the family you pretend he loved, He loved to Hate He loved to Control He loved to terrorize He loved to rape. this scum Is lucky he is solitary, When I knew of this Man I was the new blood He set me up and burned me down he sold me down the river, this scum is a known snitch it all on paper its all in black and white. any federal prison would know this this is why he stays in solitary like a little girl. He was once at the top of his criminal game but he saw the door to freedom and he could not resist the temtation of freedom, but little did he know he made a deal with the devil early in life and he winds up right back in the twisted world of hurt pain rape and blood. guns victims and innocent children, this scum is the product of the devil if he was not he would of been shot before being incarcerated, and he did not have the balls to kill himself so the devil wins he must pay the price for losing the deal with the devil. the court documents explain it very well. with little kids separated and spoken to by doctors trained in the art of perception and lies would know right away if the girls were liars, it is known fact that your scum you defend is the liar caught red handed with a sawed off shotgun and caught trying to fuck his own adopted daughgter. sick fuck loses the war, he was suppost to be the man not the boy who terrorizes, the man got sold out to the devil, you sean riker scum bag terrorist of small children will die a slow painful death upon great agony you will ultimatly suffer the true nature of the word evil the evil that you inflict has come back to fuck your ass with a thousand needles while you suck the dick of the black panther that owns your pussy ass , welcome to hell bitch. i told you they would get you.

from your fucking ex roommate mutha fucka

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
"In 2009 we moved to Wisconsin because I was given a plant of my own with 100 employees under me, a fat raise, paid move and it was a huge promotion." From Sean Riker's Between the Bars blog entitled "Wisconsin Inmates are an Enigma to Me"
Really Sean? A fat raise? Not true, there was no pay rate increase at that time. A paid move? Another lie, that move was paid for out of your own pocket. That is one of the issues that was debated on whether or not to accept the job. No moving expenses were going to be reimbursed at all. Your own plant? Really? You were the night warehouse supervisor. Not a plant manager, not at all.
But don't believe me. Call Arch Aluminum and Glass for yourself. Their number is (801) 886-2724. Ask for Kay or how about asking for Brett, the plant manager. Ask them if Sean was given a huge raise and paid move to WI. Ask them if Sean was a newly appointed "Plant Manager". And dont' forget to ask them if Sean was the person who broke into the facility by ramming a forklift through the side of the warehouse and broke into the small office. Ask them if Sean Riker, our newly devout Christian, was responsibile for stealing the Christmas bonus' that were cash in envelopes from all of his co-workers. The larger checks for salaried managers were trashed but the cash for lower level employees was all taken. About $2,000 in all. Ask Sean if he went into work early that next day when the break-in was discovered as to make sure he was able to control the flow of information. Luckily for Sean a black employee had just the week or so before quit in a fit from this facility and Sean was able to mastermind the framing of this black guy as the guilty person for the break-in. Ask Tom there at Arch what he thinks of Sean.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
"I flew up the totem pole to a "consultants" position. I was making 52k a year"
You are a liar. Your position was never a "consultant". And you didn't make 52k a year. You made $22 an hour at the high point. $22 an hour times 40 hours a week = $45,760. Slight difference. Unless you're counting the quarters from car washes that you were so fond of stealing.
Oh yes, the quarters. "How would you react if you beat the odds of recidivism, succeeded in life...." (Wisconsin Inmates are an Enimga to Me) You didn't beat the odds of recidivism. You lost them. You did commit the "stupid crimes" you swore you were done with. Remember when the cops from the small town came to your home on Emerson to question you about the black stationwagon being caught on film stealing quarters from the car wash. Or how about Saratoga Springs, Utah police department. Please call them at 801-766-6503 and ask them about the car wash box they found in the small river by the bridge next to Smith's and ask them if they have Sean on camera stealing quarters from the carwash multiple times on Redwood. Go ahead, ask them. Ask them if they were going to prosecute but only didn't because Sean got 200 years in WI. Or call Summit County sheriff in Park City, Utah and ask them about their case on Sean.
Ask Saratoga Springs if you stole the Honda generator from their utility storage facility. Ask them about the stolen ATV from the house on the hill overlooking Smith's. Ask Draper police about the ATV you stole from a dealership that scracted your white Chevy Colorado pickup truck. The one you had to have repaired because the damage was noticable because you let your side of the ATV slip out. The repair is on record Sean.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
"I had been punishing inmates for 30 years..." (Wisconsin Inmates are an Enigma to Me)
You were born in 1968. You are currently 44 years old. If you have been punishing inmates for the last 30 years that means you're claiming to have been an 'enforcer' of the convict code since age 14. That is quite a stretch. But even if that little tidbit is not enough to convice anyone on here of how delusional of your own past that you are let me ask you to consider this:
According to Riker v. Lappin which can be found at the following link http://law.justia.com/cases/federal/appellate-courts/ca10/08-1123/08-1123-2011-03-14.html It states "In June 2005, Sean Riker, who was afederal prisoner at that time, filed a civil action in district court asserting that he was in imminent danger of harm from other prisoners." Defendants, the BOP and two BOP directors, moved for expedited sealing of Mr. Riker's complaint, documents #2, and $3, and his motion for expedited ruling on the complaint, document"
You can slice this any way you like but Sean Riker is a prison snitch. He is not only a snitch but a coward. He asked the courts for protection. This means Sean Riker is an informant, a prison snitch and was in federal prison under "Protective" status. He was PC. Ask Sean Riker why he spent the last couple of years of his federal prison sentence at FCI - Englewood. Which is a medium security federal prison in Littleton, Colorado. That's because he was transferred there for his own protection at his own request. Sean Riker claims to have followed the 'convict code' for 30 years yet in 2005 he appealed to the federal courts for protection from other, unnamed inmates. Give me a break. It's exactly why he acted out in Racine Co. Jail, because he did not want to face a general population yard in WI filled with black inmates. He wanted to act out and be tough so he would get solitary and be alone. He is a sheep in wolf's clothing. Tough on the outside but a real bitch on the inside.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
You can say whatever you want about Sean or any situation about Sean that you want. I realize there is no reasoning with the unreasonable. But there is proof that Sean Riker is an informant and was in protective custody during his federal prison years. The same years that he so fondly remembers in his blog "Wisconsin Inmates are an Enigma to Me". Sean Riker knows the truth about who he is and what he's done in his life. Sean will meet his maker and answer then. Nobody else needs to 'convince' others or whatever. Sean said on his blog that he spends his days working out, eating well, watching tv and writing to his hundreds of followers. Yet you claim Sean has no tv and is financially poor. Yet in the lawsuit that you (Nathan) and Sean jointly filed it states that your inmate account fund does not have the available money to pay any portion of the filing fee and you are waived from the fee. Sean on the other hand had a balance in his personal inmate account that did allow for a partial filing fee of around $3 I believe. That shows that Sean does have some money, arguably more money in his personal account than you do. So please save the sob story of Sean being an inbattled prisoner of war that starves himself for the greater good of truth and justice. It's a bit fucking ridiculous, really.
Sean is a proven liar on multiple accounts. The most humerous part of this though is that you have been fooled and you don't even know it yet. You think that you and Sean are some team of fighters who are fighting for justice and that you're this great jailhouse lawyer. Yet the legal arguements you provide and your reasoning skills are low-budget at best and would really only attempt to persuade the most intellectually dull among us. People with real knowledge of Sean and any real legal knowledge and the ability to see through the bullshit can see that you are not as smart or legal-savvy as you believe yourself to be and that Sean really is the piece of shit that I am others claim him to be.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Sean is highly intelligent although his sociopathic tendancies negate some of that he is still more intelligent that you Nathan. This is no friendship of equal means or equal abilities. It's a friendship of convience and nessesity for Sean and you are his personal pawn. You are waving the flag of the wrong team my friend. You believe that Sean is innocent and you are his greatest fighter. It's ridiculous. One day (and I realize you will never admit it to me or publicy) you will wake up and realize that Sean has duped you. He has played you for a fool and you fell for it. You are putting your name on this blog publicy supporting a man who is know a sex offender and a known prison informant and PC inmate. Meanwhile on Sean's own BtB personal site (which has now been removed as we all know) Sean spews such silly things that he is the "Lord of the Lames" there in WI and that he was a high level enforcer of the convict code and has sworn to uphold it, yadda yadda yadda. I have posted the proof of this numerous times. You can't deny it. It's there and everyone else can see it. You are aligning yourself with a person who can't be on a real prison yard because he's a punk and he himself asked to be removed from general population because he was scared for his life. Now that you're sticking up for him and screaming of his innocence it makes you lose all credibility for other causes you may take up. Sean is using you and you are not even aware of it. But I do believe that one day you will wise up to this situation and see it for what it is. You'll realize that Sean is the monster he is accused of being and that not only did he beat his ex-wife and sexually abuse his two step-children but that he also lies about really everything and that he is exactly the type of person in prison that you claim to be against. You'll feel so much embarassment and you will try to do what you can to distance yourself from him. And on that day that you realize that you've been taken by someone smarter than you I will be enjoying my freedom and enjoying knowing all along that I was right. My vindication came a long time ago, no need for it now.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
"Mr. Riker conessed in a public document that he was an informant thereby potentially exposing himself to a risk of physical harm, and that the basis for sealing, Mr. Riker's belief that he was in imminent danger, may continue even though he has been realased from custody." (US Court of Appeals 10th Circuit D.C. No. 1:04-cv-01178-MSK)

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Nathan you have another page going now titled "Charges filed against Sean Riker's ex-wife for downloading porn" yet in the sole piece of supporting evidence that you provided for this page it proves that no charges were filed or will be filed. In your attached document from the Racine County D.A.'s office (that you so masterfully filed in your own name for 'strategic' purposes it clearly states that "The Racine County District Attorney's Officed will not be issuing a complaint in the above -entitled matter."
So you're claiming by your title that charges have been 'filed' yet in the letter from the district attorney they say they are not brining forth any charges. This seems pretty clear cut to me that 1) you're a dumbass and 2) that you're wrong. So please inform us all of what we're so obviously missing because 1+1 doesn't equal 3 in this senario.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Sean hawking presonal family videos online for sale, I mean donation, for $50 each. How generous that you did offer them for $50 each and now in Nathan's new blog that is entitled "Moderating the Sean Riker debate" you so generously have lowered the price to $10 each. Let me guess, a pre-Christmas sale! How wonderful to share the holiday spirit.
Let me showcase one of my personal favorites:
"#2) 'My daughter being born' This DVD is where my life beagn in 2007. It shows my daughter being born and what a good father I was. It's graphic."
Please tell me what "good father" sells videos of his then wife giving birth to their child. In one of life's most intimate of moments that Sean himself claims to be graphic (like a vagina with a baby's head coming out of it for God's sake) Sean is using the opportunity to exploit the child he claims to so dealy love. Father of the year material right there Sean Riker. Thank you for showing us all what a great father you are by proving this by selling home made private videos. That sure is proof that you're a great father, oops, I mean good father. You said good father.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
"I'm glad I went, I met a lot of good people" (Sean's comments on Moderting the Sean Riker debate - posted above)
Really? You met a lot of good people. People like Mark Jordan? The man you framed for murder and has been saying for the last decade plus that you killed David Stone and not him. Remember David Stone was murdered on the yard at Florence USP and shortly after that you snitched and got the directors of the prison to help cover for you and that's why you got to be moved from Florence USP to FCI-Englewood. That's why you became a PC inmate. That's why you filed a motion for expedited sealing of your court records. You can laugh and yuck it up because you and I both know that you're in a state prison, not a federal one now, and that in WI there is a small white prison gang population and the threat from such groups to you is much less in WI than it would be in other states or the federal system. But don't take my word for it. Please write to inmate Mark Jordan at: Mark Jordan #48374-066, Big Sandy USP, P.O. Box 2068, Inez, KY 41224. Ask him about all the other good people Sean met and made friends with. Nobddy said you were a member of the Aryan Brotherhood but if they could get their hands on a NLR dropout such as yourself you bet they would. And one final bit on this. If you're not scared about the inmates in WI finding out you're a snitch then why (besides claiming that reason in your two million dollar lawsuit) did you recently file a federal motion to have that paperwork sealed. Yes, I know that you recently motioned the courts to have the currently public document sealed for your own safety. I also know about the other things you wrote during this summer. It was two pieces of mail specifically and they were mailed to the same person/group. They were about the same situation. They contained information from you that does not match what you claimed to have happened in 1995. Ask Sean specifically to tell you what I'm talking about. I won't throw Sean under the bus just yet, I'll give him a month to tell you himself what I'm talking about otherwise I'll do it myself.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Sean, you brought your own father into this situation. It was the little piece of lined paper cut in half with your father's scribbles on it claiming that the family photo's he received had feces smeared on them. The same letter that the divorce court judge, Flancher, refused to accept as fact and dismissed. When your father wrote that note and lied to the judge on a sworn document and then later assisted you by offering to mail certificate of service documents you brought him into this. Your father was never brought into this before that happened. So are you telling us that you didn't own a Kodak printer and that you didn't buy color ink at the store to avoid having photos developed professionaly and that you didn't send porn pictures to your dad almost weekly. Does your dad not have a huge stash of porn movies in his barn that his wife doens't know about? Why did you tell me your dad lost his business in California and had to move to Oregon from family pressure. Wasn't it because you said he was on his boat with a young girl in her early or mid teens and that he was having sexual contact of some type with her. Since this girl was a friend of the family or something it was handled by the family and your dad lost the business and most of his money and had to move out of state. Isn't that why he doesn't own a computer and doesn't get on the internet?

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Sean claims his fiancee, Angel, killed herself because of his wrongful conviction in the criminal case against him. Okay, lets back up here for a second. First, Angel knew Sean since his young days in California. And when he went to federal prison Sean claims she wrote to him as a friend on and off for basically the entire 12 years. So if you loved this woman so much and she had given you so muc hcompaionship throughout 12 years of your life at least then why didn't you marry her when you got out. Or at least hook up with her and see where things went. Let's be honest Sean, you didn't actually get with Angel once you had real freedom because she was very overweight and very unattractive and those shallow qualities do matter to you. You claimed on your PrisonInmates website that such features don't matter to you and you wouldn't hold them against someone. Yet for people who really don't hold physical looks or weight against people they don't need to actually say that. It's kind of a given.
The funderal website shows tath she is survived by her son Noah. It does not give an age for her son. But since her son lived in the same town as her and both of her parents lived outside of the state of South Dakota I will assume this son was under 18. Which brings about the obvious...this woman killed herself over the agony of your conviction and left hre son motherless. You never were in a relationsihp with this woman outside of prison. You never gave yourself to her after being released from federal prison. Instead your greed andselfishness brought you to a more attractive woman and you left Angel as 'just a friend'. If this woman did kill herself over you and left her son motherless that makes her absolutely bat shit crazy, more crazy than even you Sean Riker.
And it makes her exactly the mentally unstable mother that you keep claiming your ex-wife is/was. Suicide is selfish, short-sighted and happens when people are mentally unstable. At least she only took her own life and nobody else with her. You know, some Christians believe that people who commit suicide don't go to heaven because suicide is a sin. But I won't harp on that, there's no need to rub salt in the wound. You have ruined so many lives Sean Riker. Paula did time in prison because of you and suffered abuse from you, your ex-wife's life is ruined to a certain degree, the children's lives are ruined to certain degrees, your mother disowned you, you ruined Mark Jordan's life, you murdered David Stone over who knows what retarded issue, Angel killed herself because of you and now her son has no mother. This is just the top of the iceberg for all of the misery and ruin you have caused in so many lives.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Welcome to Crazy-town where Sean is Jim Jones, Angel is the first death by brainwashing and Nathan Lindell is running around drunk with Kool-aid stains around his mouth.
Someone please call me a bitch and tell me "you lie too" because that right there totally proves Sean is innocent. Talk about hard facts and evidence. All Sean ever has is woman ranting about how they feel or think or what their opinions are. Nothing more than that. Sean's had three good years to put out his evidence of innocence and it never amounts to anything more than writtne dribble by lonely women.
Why did Sean delete his own between the bars blog? Why?

Sweetpea1 Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
FYI Angel did NOT commit suicide. I know this because her own mother called me and told me what happened. I do not know why you guys are saying she commited suicide. I can't see her mom lying to me about Angel's death. Leave the poor girl out of this and let her rest in peace!

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Please ask Sean to give you a copy of the letter that he claims was sent from his ‘daughter’ to him alleging that either her mother and/or her new husband were taking inappropriate pictures of her. Because this is an awesome allegation and I would really like Sean to prove this one for all of us including his hundreds of followers. On Sean’s PrisonInmates.com profile he states “My daughter in elementary wrote to me…” which is factually inaccurate because 1) the child is question is not his daughter either biologically or through any legal means of adoption and 2) the child in question is not in elementary considering she is several years past elementary age. Unless, on the off chance Sean is speaking of his own biological daughter who does happen to be of elementary age but this child is so young that she is simply incapable of writing a letter, let alone a detailed letter about ‘child porn’ on the internet (which seems to be Sean’s kick at the moment) and she would be totally unable to know Sean’s prison address and be capable of mailing a letter. But I know, I know…..the details don’t matter. Sean is clearly going for quantity instead of quality on his frenzied push of accusations.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
So back to the issue above. He claims he received this letter and then makes the claim that he sent it to everyone he possibly could think of including the Colorado Attorney General and social services and probation among others. Well in the attached letter from the Colorado Attorney General it clearly states that “We received YOUR letter regarding your daughter” Nowhere does this letter state that they received a copy of the child’s letter that you claim to have sent them. From the writing on the Attorney General’s letter it appears they received nothing more than a letter from Sean with his own ideas about what he thinks is happening with no proof to back it up. If I’m wrong they prove you sent them a copy of the child’s letter. Or better yet post a copy of this letter here for all of us to see. I mean you told the social worker you couldn’t send it to her because you already “mailed it to your attorney”. So which attorney is this? The defense attorney in your criminal case that you claimed sexually molested you so that you could get him kicked off the case because you didn’t like him? Or the attorney that was just dismissed from another one of your cases because the judge said she no longer had to represent you. Or Mark Workman, because he did not get a copy of a child’s letter. Please help us understand.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
It’s also funny because I have had the pleasure of speaking to both social services and probation and reading both letters that were sent to those agencies. In the letter to probation Sean claims that the new husband is the person responsible for taking the pictures of the child and putting them online. Probation also received no letter or copy of a letter from the child. (So make up your mind about which adult is taking child porn pictures Sean because when you write multiple agencies that all have connections to each other and your story wildly changes and you claim one person is doing it and then later that another person is it makes you look like, well frankly, a fucking idiot and a liar as well). So on to social services. They also received a letter from you claiming that the new husband was the person taking the pictures yet they received no copy of a letter from the child. I also had the pleasure of reading the four page tirade you sent to the judge in this County and you again did not enclose a copy of the child’s letter. You just made more claims that counteract each other.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
You claim that your ex-wife met her current husband on a pen-pal prison website in the letter to the judge. Yet in the letter to probation you claim that the husband was taking pictures of the child during the very same time that he was incarcerated. And in the letter to the judge you mention nothing of pictures being taken at all. Just more dribble about your ex-wife being mentally unstable and abusive (snore). It is simply impossible for this man to have taken any pictures of anyone when he was incarcerated and you knew he was incarcerated. You claim that your ex-wife knows nothing of this man but whatever lies he told her through letters. Yet with claims that he took pictures it makes it seem like he was a part of their lives pre-prison. So did your ex-wife meet this man on a prison pen-pal website or not? And now you have Nathan saying such nonsense that your ex-wife met her first husband through a pen-pal prison website as well. Umm, really? Prove that or explain it somehow because these wild tales are so off base. You clearly have no idea about anything that is happening at all or has in the past. Was the first baby-daddy a drunken one night stand as you claim in the letter to the judge or someone who was met through a pen-pal site while incarcerated? Post proof of the man you claim is a rapist and child molester. Post his conviction record, it is public. Post his convictions so that the time frames are visible and tell me if he was ever incarcerated in prison for any crimes let alone sexual assault crimes before or during the time your ex-wife was with him. Please, get these men and their lives straight.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Speaking of straight I would like to take this moment to bring up something unrelated that I certainly don’t want to forget. During the search of the home on Nordic Ridge Dr. in Wind Lake, WI a certain item was found. This item was a large, black dildo that was wrapped in paper towels and found inside of a drawer in your large upright tool chest. Now in the course of the entire relationship this black dildo was never mentioned or brought to the attention of your spouse. It was only after being asked by the Racine County Sheriff’s office about the item that your spouse was made aware of it. I will say that the item was never actually seen and that it was only mentioned. So take it for what it’s worth but according to law enforcement you had a black dildo in paper towels in the garage in your tool chest. This makes you a faggot, Sean. And really, I’m not all that surprised. During the marriage you always complained that the sex wasn’t good enough. You often brought up that Paula and other past women gave you better sex and were specific in including that those women licked your rectum and put their fingers inside of your rectum. Since these sexual actions did not happen during your marriage you complained. I hope your sexual fetishes and desires are being fulfilled now that you’re in prison again, around black men in abundance and rectum is all you’ve got to work with.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Moving along…..Sean claims in his most recent two million dollar lawsuit against his ex-wife that he was in danger of other inmates and jail/prison staff because of false child porn accusations. This is so weird because in your blog post titled “Wisconsin Inmates are an Enigma to Me” you clearly wrote that “I will do nothing because NOTHING is what they will do to me” (your emphasis, not mine) in reference to you enforcing the convict code on other inmates. So are you literally scared for your life and safety from other inmates as you claim in the lawsuit or are you totally bullshitting because you wrote yourself that Wisconsin inmates are “lames” that you are the ‘lord of the lames’ that the inmates in prison respect you, you’re their idol, they cheered you as you entered the cell block, yadda yadda. This is pretty big Sean and it undercuts your entire lawsuit among other claims but this one is pretty stark as an example. Maybe this is why you removed your blog from Between the Bars completely. Or maybe it was some other reason.
Maybe the women you know you’ll find as supportive on these types of sites are generally women who are overweight, less than average attractiveness and generally older, depressed women. So your blog post titled “How to Remove Lardus Buttamus” was quite a hoot. I mean you claim on your PrisonInmates.com website that you don’t care about looks and won’t hold looks against anyone so long as they don’t bring false criminal allegations against you but in this Lardus Buttamus post you tell people that they need to eat plain boneless, skinless chicken breast with raw veggies to lose weight. Anyone who chooses to not lose weight is a lazy couch potato that has no self-esteem according to you. Yes, Sean you are again the master. You depend on women (who are generally fat and/or ugly to be blunt) and yet you write speeches about losing weight and telling those that don’t how pathetic they are. Fucking awesome!

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Moving along……Sean I think you are having a seriously hard time accepting that you are no longer the man you once were. You were at the top of your game in federal prison at one point. But you did lose it all because of greed and your uncontrollable need for control of others. You can’t even resist your own urges. No matter how smart you are or how manipulative you are you simply can’t keep yourself in check even when it is for your own best interest and you lash out. All of your online blog posts hurt you more, discredit your credibility and show you to be the raging asshole that most of us know you as just keeps being used against you. Thank you Sean for making this so much easier for me, you have been your own worst enemy and my best weapon in countering you. Holy fuck, you are so intelligent yet so fucking stupid at the same time. You won the physical battle in your marriage. You were clearly larger and stronger but you lost the war. You lost the battle of the words and the battle of being smarter and more capable. Your stupid, fat, lazy (blah, blah) ex-wife won. She is smarter than you and she won. Say whatever you want, have Nathan say whatever he wants but you know. You know it and I know it. And since this is all about me and you we’re the only ones who matter. So, your best days are behind you. You’re no longer a high ranking member of the NLR and you can’t sport that tattoo on your stomach like it’s “gold” (your word, not mine). You have to be so very grateful that you’re in WI and not another state with a larger NLR/AB presence because they’d get you Sean. They would get you. They still might actually, I suppose nothing is impossible. I mean you swore you’d never see the inside of a prison again and look at how that worked out for you. Now you’re going to die in one. And no one from your family will visit you, you have nothing but random chicks who all fall off after a while and none will last forever. A long lonely stream of meaningless mail-order relationships and lawsuits you keep filing and always lose. Now that you’re no longer the prized pig of the federal prison snitch group you have nobody on the inside helping you. This must be a very different prison experience for you. Your past offerings to the feds mean nothing now, they disposed of you and your prior services (snitching) are worth nothing. The glory days are over for you. You are a pathetic shell of the man that you used to be. Your face is pale and sunken in, your eyes hollow. You continue to post pictures of you in your physical prime but that’s not you anymore Sean. You lost significant weight, your face has aged a decade within a year, your hair is long and your entire appearance is unkempt. You are dying a slow death and your body shows it, your inability to consolidate rational arguments and keep your stories straight shows that your mental capacity is deteriorating.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Thank you for spending $304.xx to have the United States Marshall Service bring lawsuit papers to your ex-wife. What a good use of money. I mean think of how many soups that could have bought you or even almost a tv. I think DOC tv’s cost about $400, right? Well anyway, money well spent because you’re totally going to get two million dollars for delusional lies  Oh, one other thing. You don’t have the new address you bitch and you know it. That’s why the last mail was sent to the old address. And when you were confronted on the telephone and asked to say the new address in open court you declined. You have mailed nothing to the new address. And you’re so good at letting people know that you ‘know’ new things (such as smiley faces next to the last name) that if you did have the new address you would be all over it and mailing something to let us all know. But you haven’t and you didn’t say it out loud on the phone during court. But you said you have it. Seriously, you are so pathetic.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
How come you changed your PrisonInmates profile? I really liked the one that you said you were getting out. Especially since you claimed that you had new DNA evidence to prove your innocence. Yet you’ve said multiple times that NO evidence except your ex-wives spoken lies were used against you in court. So that is a pretty big discrepancy. You also make the outlandish claim that your defense (not sure who, Hart?) is in contacts with the courts about a “fat settlement” on your behalf. So not true. Racine County Victim Witness validated that no such action was in motion, nothing even close. This was such a blatant attempt to lure women into thinking they had a real chance at love with you and stringing them along just long enough to get some money out of them and then on to the next. I get it, I really do. But it’s laughable for those of us looking on from afar. You screaming online about how happy you are that you’re getting out. “I’m getting out! I’m so happy I could scream!” And the truth of course is that you are not getting out. So what would make you say something like that? You are either knowingly lying and then what is the purpose of that type of lie? To get women to write you and think you’re on the verge of getting out. And with claims of a big settlement some lonely woman thinks she found the jackpot in you! A almost released, soon to be rich man who has good looks in his picture and swears he doesn’t care about how you look (age, race, weight). What a deal for any lucky lady! The second option of course is that you might actually believe your own delusions. The first one is what I assume the motivation is, the second one is incredibly sad Sean. If you actually believe your own crazy statements then you are much further gone that even I suspect at this point. I mean Sean, come on now. You’re doing 7 ½ years for the escape/damage charges. Then if the 200 years were taken away by some miracle you would be charged with the second batch of jail damage as well as the threats to the judge and D.A.’s. So let’s just say another decade to be super conservative. Then you’d be brought back to Utah to face dozens of state felonies for commercial burglary, theft, vehicular theft for the ATV’s, trailers and RV from St. George. You’d face all the car wash theft charges, the federal mail charges, the breaking the window at the Chase bank on Redwood and so many others I can’t even think of them all right now. You are far from “getting out” and acting as if the special day is any day upon us now. You will die in prison and every single person alive is better off for it because all you ever do is hurt people, destroy lives and destroy property. You have no redeeming value and you are a danger to society. You are exactly where you deserve to be and where you need to be for public safety.

Nicki Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Hi guys!

Just thought I'd drop by and wish you a collective Merry Christmas ;)

Nicki

sweetpea01 Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
This is all some real serious Jerry Springer shit! Sean's lawyer (Mr. Hart) told me the only thing you guys had to convict Sean on was that what the children said in court matched what was said in homemade family videos made over 3 years ago or whatever. Is this true? Is this all they had to convict him on and gave him 200 years in prison over? or did Mr. Hart lie to me or just not tell me the full truth?? Another thing that comes to mind is why did the kids get taken away from Tayler and then returned except for one of them? I seen the police report and it doesn't look to good. Also, why did Tayler have Sean arrested before in the past before they moved to Wisconsin and then turn around and write a letter to the judge and had Sean released?? Also, Mr. Hart told me that when you had Sean arrested for all these crimes and he was in the county jail there in Wisconsin you was sending him letters and pictures of the children. He said you guys almost got in trouble over this and was told not to contact him anymore. Why on earth would you even contact him let alone send pictures of the kids to him IF he really did do all the things you say he did. Also, his past and what went on in Federal Prison has nothing to do with this case. And it does not prove he beat or raped or whatever his children or you. If there is REAL evidence (other than he said she said bullshit)of Sean beating you guys and molesting or rapeing the kids PLEASE post it then. Also, I have spoken with a retired Correctional officer that has known Sean all his life and all about his past. This officer told me that yes Sean has done some bad things in his life but there is no way in hell he would ever hurt a child. This officer told me that every single time they talk to Sean he always ask what he can do to protect his kids and what is gonna happen to his kids and ect. NOW, I don't know any of you guys in person at all. All I know is what I read on the web and what you say, what Sean says, and what others say.

sweetpea01 Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
continued...I just want to see REAL proof of the things Sean is accused of if all this stuff is true. Most of all I just hope the kids are safe and I truly hope that all these things did not happen to them but if it did happen I hope they are able to overcome and heal from all this somehow. All this shit that I keep seeing on here is absolutely fucking crazy! If you guys really care about those kids then stop this shit. I am sure they are embarrassed enough knowing that the whole world knows about what happened to them and after all this time you are still on here posting all kinds of shit that I am sure those kids do not want everyone to see. Especially if they are trying to move on with their lives and heal from this crap. And if Sean really did do all the things you say he did then he does deserve whatever he gets but if you have lied about the whole thing and caused an innocent man to go to prison then you deserve worse. There is nothing worse than someone who would hurt a child in any way shape or form other than someone who lies about it actually happening. But I will admit with all the things I have read about Sean's past it does make me question some things but then again with what I have heard about and read on Tayler leaves me to question some things as well. For example why did she wait so long to turn Sean in and why didn't she do more to protect the kids IF Sean really did do the things he is accused of doing?? Why did Tayler write to him and send pictures of the kids to him after she had him locked up?? Why did you take pictures of the kids with Sean's father (the one you say has a child porn addiction) if he really is that way?? Just alot of things don't make sense on here. And I am not the only person asking these questions. Sometimes I wonder if you guys just like drama or what. All I can say is the kids deserve better and I hope they are able to go on and have some sort of a decent life after all this. Put up some REAL proof that all these things did happen. NOT stuff about his past or any of this he said she said crap.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Admitted Evidence

28
First, both video and testimonial evidence placed Riker at the scene of the stabbing. The video shows Stone, Jordan, Riker and an inmate identified only as "Larry" sitting together at a concrete table several minutes before the stabbing. And Collins testified that he saw Riker and Larry seated at Stone's table prior to the stabbing.

29
Second, Collins claimed to have heard through the prison grapevine, albeit after the stabbing, that Riker had given Jordan the shank to "hit" Stone. Vol. XIV, at 371.

30
Finally, Jordan argues that unidentifiable DNA found on the shank indicates that someone else possessed the shank.

Proffered Evidence

31
The second source of supporting evidence — and the heart of this appeal — are four additional pieces of proffered evidence that Jordan claims would point the finger at Riker.

32
First, Jordan proffered evidence that, six months before the murder, Riker possessed a shank, "almost identical in size and shape" to the shank that killed Stone. Vol. XVI, at 739.

33
Second, Jordan offered statements by Riker to investigators after the stabbing indicating that he was untruthful about the circumstances surrounding Stone's death. Jordan contends that these lies reflect a "consciousness of guilt" on the part of Riker. Id. at 734.

34
Third, the defense claimed evidence shows that shortly after the stabbing prison officials investigated Riker as a possible suspect in Stone's homicide. Id. at 736. The record unfortunately does not disclose the basis for this statement.

35
Finally, Jordan claimed that Riker would testify that he and other inmates went over to a set of bleachers after the stabbing. On the top of the bleachers, investigators later found a blood-stained glove. Id. at 737.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Where is Sean Riker? Why haven't [government authorities] brought him in? Mr. Collins says Sean Riker was at the table at the time of the stabbing. Mr. Collins says in one of his statements that Mr. Riker actually provided the weapon.

57
I wonder whose DNA is on that handle? Any guess?

58
Vol. XVII, at 953-954.

59
Jordan's defense counsel then goes further to implicate Mr. Riker in the crime.

60
We don't have the abilities [government authorities] have. We can't go listen to phone calls that are made by Mr. Riker or some inmate by the name of Larry or Mr. Collins to see if he has been calling anybody about this. We don't have the ability to search their cells. We don't have the ability to search DNA databases to see if Mr. Riker or other people's DNA is on the weapon.

https://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/485/485.F3d.1214.06-1161.html

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
wrongfully convicted
On June 3, 1999 Federal prisoner David Stone was fatally stabbed on the main yard of the U.S. Penitentiary in Florence, Colorado. In August 2005, imprisoned civil rights activist Mark Jordan was wrongfully convicted of the murder after trial court excluded evidence that another prisoner and jailhouse snitch, Sean Riker (aka "joker"), actually committed the offense. See United States v Jordan, 485 F .3d 1214 (10th cir 2007). The Jordan center is offering a ten thousand dollar rewards for information that will clear Jordan's name. We are asking anyone with information regarding this case and Mr. Jordan's innocence to write:
Donald Bounds
Attorney at Law
1994 Lincoln Ave.
Parker, Coloardo 80134

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Remember Sean, the letter that you had Angel write to child protective services in Colorado stating that she would take your children and raise them when their mother went to prison. How nice of her. Well their mother never did go to prison, something you've been saying will happen anyday for, well for the last three years. And now that Angel killed herself according to you your own children would have been motherless had that unstable woman ever had the chance to take them. Women who kill themselves over men they have prison-only relationships with are crazy. And this is the woman you wanted to take your children in because she was better able to parent the children. How'd that work out for you?

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
According to the defendants’ submissions in support of summary judgment, which Riker has
failed to appropriately contest, Riker was booked in to the Racine County Jail on November 11,
2009, being held on numerous felony charges including multiple counts of First Degree Recklessly
Endangering Safety, Possession of a Firearm by a Felon, Strangulation and Suffocation, Child
Abuse—Causing Mental Harm, and Child Abuse—Intentionally Causing Harm. (Docket No. 36,
¶1-2.) While awaiting trial, Racine County Jail staff initially housed Riker in administrative
segregation due to the potential safety and security threat he posed within the jail. (Docket No. 36, ¶
3.) The Racine County Jail policy regarding administrative segregation provides that the decision to
place someone in segregation can be based on purely subjective evaluations and predictions of
future behavior or on informed predictions based on past behavior. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 25.)
Segregation is designed to help protect those threatened by the behavior of the inmate as well to
protect the inmate himself. (Id.) An inmate who displays or threatens aggressive behavior towards
staff or other inmates or has any sort of disciplinary problem may need administrative segregation.
(Id.)
Internal investigation revealed that Riker subscribed to a white supremacist ideology, the
expression of which could pose a threat to the safety of other inmates, jail staff, or Riker himself
due to the ethnic and racial diversity of the general population. (Id ¶ 3.) Riker’s assignment to
administrative segregation was done as a precautionary measure, pursuant to jail policy, in an effort
to maintain the safety and security of the jail environment. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 4.) Inmates in
administrative segregation are allowed to have one hour per day outside their cell to shower, use the

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
phone, and exercise in the day room. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 5.) On November 28, 2009, Riker filed an
inmate request/complaint demanding to be placed in general population, to which Sheriff Thompson
responded and advised Riker that his classification was to ensure jail security and safety and his
classification would be reviewed every ten days. (Docket No. 36, ¶¶ 6-7.)
On December 20, 2009, Riker flooded his cell and broke the seat off his desk, then pounded
the heavy metal seat against the cell door, causing jail staff to transfer him to a different cell.
(Docket No. 36, ¶ 8.) On December 29, 2009, during a meeting with a mental health worker, Riker
broke a cell door and shouted racial slurs, which were directed at other inmates. (Docket No. 36, ¶
9.) On December 31, 2009, Riker was yelling at inmates from day rooms 2 and 3, and Officer
Hernandez advised Riker to stand down. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 10.) Riker refused to stand down and
yelled to “get those niggers away from the windows” and asked Officer Hernandez for “any nigger
to kill.” (Id.) Riker also threatened to kick Officer Hernandez’s “ass.” (Id.) On January 2, 2010,
Riker threatened staff members standing guard during his shower, specifically telling Sergeant
Gonzales that “I’m gonna catch you when you don’t have five people around you. I’m gonna
remember your face you fucking spic, and you’re gonna remember mine.” (Docket No. 36, ¶ 11.)

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
On January 6, 2010, Riker forced his solid cell door open by kicking the door with such
force that the welds broke, and was then able to push the lower portion from its track, allowing him
to exit the cell. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 12.) After exiting the cell, Riker used a metal electrical junction
box he pried from the wall to break six cell windows, two day room windows, and nine light
fixtures, depriving the jail of the use of eight cells for approximately one month. (Id.) That same
day, command staff met to formulate an action plan for safely housing Riker to prevent further
damage to the facility but in a manner in which he would not be able to carry out his threats.
(Docket 36, ¶ 13.) At the meeting, the command staff decided Riker needed to be housed by himself
in a modified cell and two man day room on administrative segregation status for safety and

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
security reasons shown from his multiple and continued violent outbursts and threats. (Docket 36, ¶
14.) These cell modifications included preemptive removal of items to prevent Riker from using
them as weapons against people or to damage property. (Id.) In addition to the removal of items
from his cell, Riker would be allowed to be out of his cell only with the Correctional Emergency
Response Team (“CERT”) standing by for showering and phone use, (Docket No. 36, ¶ 15), during
which time his cell would be cleaned and searched, (Docket No. 36, ¶ 16). The staff also determined
that Riker would not be allowed in the dayroom without leg irons and belly chains, and made
special security measures for transporting him to and from the courthouse. (Docket No. 36, ¶¶ 17-
18.) Riker claims that the belly chains and leg irons caused him severe physical injuries due to the
way he had to position his body to use the phone and the mental strain of administrative segregation
and limited recreation time caused severe mental and psychological injury. (Docket No. 1.)
Following these security measures, Riker again on January 12, 2010 tampered with a
sprinkler head but was stopped and secured to a body board when he threatened to disarm a guard
carrying a taser. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 19.) On January 22, 2010, he was transferred to a cell on “2D”,
where he remained for the rest of his time at the Racine County Jail. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 20.) Once in
2D, due to Riker’s prior threats, acts of violence, and repeated property damage, it was determined
that Riker would be allowed out of his cell on only Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays during first

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
shift, in which he was allowed to use the common room/day room for recreation while the CERT
team supervised him. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 21.) On July 28, 2010, Riker was out of his cell for shower
and exercise when he slipped out of his belly chain. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 24.) Riker yelled racial
epithets at black inmates in nearby day rooms as he swung the belly chain around, using the stillattached
padlock to damage windows of the neighboring day rooms. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 24.)
Lt. Brown conducted periodic reviews concerning Riker’s administrative segregation status,
but Riker remained housed in administrative segregation for the remainder of his time at Racine
7
County Jail due to continued threats towards inmates and staff and destruction of property. (Docket
No. 36, ¶¶ 22-23.)
IV. ANALYSIS
Riker claims the defendants violated his Eighth Amendment right against cruel and unusual
punishment and his Fourteenth Amendment right to due process. It appears that Riker, while in the
Racine County Jail and during the time of the alleged constitutional violations, was a pretrial
detainee. As a pretrial detainee, both claims will be analyzed under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Jackson v Ill. Medi-Car, Inc., 300 F.3d 760, 764 (7th Cir. 2002). The constitutional rights of a
pretrial detainee are derived from the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and are
distinguishable from an inmate’s right not to be subjected to cruel and unusual punishment under
the Eighth Amendment. Board v. Farnham, 394 F.3d 469, 477 (7th Cir. 2005) (citing Bell v Wolfish,
441 U.S. 520, 535 (1979)). Although the Eighth Amendment does not apply to pretrial detainees,
detainees are entitled to at least as much protection as the constitution provides convicted prisoners.
Id. (internal citations omitted). Although there is a distinction, it is of little significance in
application, and courts have found it appropriate to use the same standard for claims arising out of
both the Eighth Amendment (convicted prisoners) and the Fourteenth Amendment (pretrial
detainees). Id. (citing Henderson v. Sheahan, 195 F.3d 839, 845 (7th Cir. 1999)).
A. Plaintiff’s Due Process Claim
The court begins its analysis with Riker’s claim that his placement in administrative
segregation upon booking, without an initial hearing, and his continued segregation status
throughout his stay at the Racine County Jail, was a deprivation of due process. “A person has a
liberty interest in avoiding placement in a status that is atypical and imposes a significant hardship
on the inmate in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life.” Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472,
484 (1995). If a liberty interest exists, then due process requires informal, non-adversarial, but

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
periodic review of the confinement. Alston v. DeBruyn, 13 F.3d 1036, 1042 (7th Cir. 1994) (citing
Kentucky Dept. of Corrections v. Thompson, 490 U.S. 454, 462-63 (1989); Hewitt v. Helms, 459
U.S. 460, 472 (1983)). A condition of confinement may be imposed on a pretrial detainee without
violating the due process clause if it is reasonably related to a legitimate and non-punitive
governmental goal; it may not be arbitrary or purposeless. Antonelli v. Sheahan, 81 F.3d 1422, 1428
(7th Cir. 1996) (citing United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 747 (1987)). Safety and preventing
danger to the community are legitimate governmental goals that outweigh an individual’s liberty
interest, depending upon the circumstances. Id. A pretrial detainee has a right to due process before
conditions or restrictions are imposed upon him only if those restrictions or conditions amount to
punishment of the detainee. Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 536 (1979).
In the case at hand, Riker was placed in administrative, non-disciplinary segregation
immediately upon booking. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 3.) This was done for safety and security reasons that
the jail staff identified during the preliminary internal investigations. (Docket No. 39, ¶ 4.) There is
a liberty interest in avoiding placement in a status that is atypical, but there is nothing atypical about
Riker’s placement. According to Racine County Jail policy, inmates are placed in administrative
segregation for a multitude of reasons, including potential safety risks to the general population.
(Docket No. 36, ¶ 25.) Also, according to the policy, a subjective evaluation of potential future risk
is a reason for placement in administrative segregation. (Id.) The Racine County Jail staff, which
identified and evaluated potential future risks regarding Riker in general population, acted in
accordance with the jail’s own policy in placing Riker in administrative segregation. Riker was not
deprived of any liberty interest he possessed because his placement was in accordance with the
policy governing all persons detained at the jail. Riker was dealt with in accordance with that policy
and therefore, his placement cannot be considered “atypical.”

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Of course, Riker has a liberty interest in avoiding placement for no reason or for reasons that
are baseless. This is where adherence to the jail policy regarding placement in administrative
segregation is critical. Given the facts of this case, the policy was followed and Riker’s placement
was warranted. There is no due process violation because Riker’s placement and subsequent
conditions were reasonably related to a non-punitive governmental goal—safety to the general
prison community, staff and inmates alike. Riker’s placement was not punishment for any conduct,
but was done for his benefit and the benefit of his fellow inmates and the prison staff. The staff
recognized the potential security and safety risks that could result from Riker’s expression of his
racist attitudes within the ethnically and racially diverse general prison population. The staff was
legitimately concerned that Riker’s continued presence in the general population would be the fuel
to create an explosive situation, endangering the safety of inmates, staff, and Riker. The safety risks
to the prison community presented by Riker’s attitudes and behavior far outweigh any liberty
interest Riker may have had in avoiding placement. Since this is a legitimate goal and jail policy
was followed, there is no violation of due process.
Riker, along with his initial placement, also complains of his continued segregation status
with limiting conditions, and continued denials of requests to be in general population. Riker was
not deprived of any procedure since his status was reviewed periodically, every 10-14 days, and his
continued requests were read and considered. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 22.) Wearing instructed Brown to
conduct these reviews, and they were carried out. (Docket No. 38, ¶ 10.) As indicated, due process
requires only informal, non-adversarial, periodic reviews of status. The decisions made thereafter
not to return Riker to the general population are fully justified based on his actions damaging
property damage and his threats to staff and other inmates while in administrative segregation. (See
Docket No. 36, ¶ 23.) Continued placement in administrative segregation was warranted f

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
for the
same reasons he was initially placed there—safety risks to the prison community.
10
It is not difficult to see that Riker posed a threat to the general population, and his conduct
warranted his stricter limiting conditions within administrative segregation. These stricter
conditions were not punishment or retribution, but necessary measures to ensure the safety of the
staff and other inmates. Riker was able to destroy property and even escape from his cell and belly
chain, so the heightened conditions were necessary to make sure that Riker was physically unable to
continue the property damage and potentially carry out one of his many threats to staff and other
inmates. The restraint measures may have been a hardship for Riker, but they were necessary. Due
to the necessity and purpose of the stricter confinement, and the periodic reviews throughout his
segregations status, the court finds no violation of due process in Riker’s continued segregation
status.
The defendants have presented the measures taken to restrain Riker, but Riker claims that
the multiple incident reports and continued misconduct warranting the restrictions are “lies and half
truths.” (Docket No. 41.) Although he makes this conclusory assertion, he has not presented
anything specific to place these facts in dispute. The court concludes that the conditions imposed on
the plaintiff were not punishment and did not violate due process.
B. Plaintiff’s Cruel and Unusual Punishment Claim
The court now looks to whether or not the conditions of the Riker’s confinement in
administrative segregation amounted to cruel and unusual punishment. Riker claims that the
conditions of his confinement, most notably his restriction on recreation and yard time, subjected
him to cruel and unusual punishment as prohibited by the Eighth Amendment. As noted above,
because Riker was a pretrial detainee, his claim is to be analyzed under the Fourteenth Amendment.
The mere fact that pretrial detention interferes with a person’s desire to live comfortably an

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
human needs” or the “minimum measure of life’s necessity” Rhoades v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337,
347 (1981). Claims of cruel and unusual punishment require the plaintiff to show he has suffered an
objectively, sufficiently serious injury, and that prison staff inflicted the injury with deliberate
indifference. Framer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 834 (1994). The standard for deliberate indifference
is that the defendant committed an act so dangerous that his knowledge of the risk can be inferred or
that the defendant knew of an impending harm. Antonelli, 81 F.3d at 1427 (citing Miller v.
Neathery, 52 F.3d 634, 638 (7th Cir. 1995)). In terms of length of confinement with recreation
restrictions, more than 90 days of confinement without yard time is considered cruel and unusual,
but preventing access to the yard to protect prison staff from violent behavior is reasonable,
regardless of the time. Pearson v. Ramos, 237 F.3d 881, 885 (7th Cir. 2001). “To confine in
‘solitary’ a prisoner who behaves like a wild beast whenever he is let out of his cell is the least cruel
measure . . . for dealing with such a person.” Id.
In the case at hand, Riker was not completely deprived of his time out of his cell. At the
onset of administrative segregation, Riker was allowed his mandatory one hour per day recreation
time. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 5.) This privilege was slowly taken away because of Riker’s violent acts,
threats, and property damage any time he was let out of his cell. Although his recreation time was
diminished, it was never completely taken away. At the end of his stay in Racine County Jail, Riker
was still allowed out of his modified cell three days a week, Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays.
(Docket No. 36, ¶ 21.) He was to be in belly chain and leg irons while out of the dayroom. (Docket
No. 36, ¶ 17.) These conditions of confinement are fully compliant with the enunciated standards as
to what is, and is not, cruel and unusual. Riker was not denied any basic human need, as he was still
allowed out of his cell to shower and use the phon

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Above copied information from: http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/wisconsin/wiedce/2:2010cv00906/54450/46/?1342279871

Journal Times comments on various stories about Sean Riker:

October 20, 2012 6:33 pm may he die in prison.

btw, where's riker's little honey? i remember she was posting on JT defending him.
did she move on to her next psychopathic skinhead?

Sean and Nathan submitting a lawsuit together, how nice of them. http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/wisconsin/wiwdc/3:2012cv00759/32672/5/?ts=1353515576

You two must be awfully busy:

Lindell, Nathaniel et al v. Jess, Cathy et al

Filed: October 15, 2012 as 3:2012cv00759


Plaintiffs: Nathaniel Allen Lindell and Sean A. Riker

Defendants: Cathy A. Jess and John Does

Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights

Court:Seventh Circuit > Wisconsin > Western District Court

Type:P. Petitions > Civil Rights


Riker, Sean v. Overbo, Todd et al

Filed: September 24, 2012 as 3:2012cv00696


Plaintiff: Sean A. Riker

Defendants: Todd Overbo , Vicki J. Sebatian, Kelli R. Wellard-West, Timothy Haines, Ellie Ray and others

Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights

Court:Seventh Circuit > Wisconsin > Western District Court

Type:P. Petitions > Civil Rights

Megan Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
First of Tayler, you're remarried so why are you on here hiding behind a false name and making false statements. We know you framed Sean and that you severely abused your children it's all on paper. Let's not bring Angel up in these conversations anymore that is unneccessary and completely unacceptable. Sean is a very, very good friend of mine and he will be set free it's just a matter of time. I do not doubt the innocence of Sean, nothing about him screams child and wife abuser, except the false reports made by Tayler. Tayler if I were you, I would be concerned about your wrongdoing and how you abused your children physically, mentally, and emotionally, and how you will suffer at the hands of the justice system. You keep pointing the fingers at Sean, but you're guilty and you think that you're going to continue to bash Sean and make up false testimony to present to the court, you deserve to rot in a small cell for what you have done. Why are you so abusive? Why are you so evil? Why do you hate your kids and Sean so much? Why did you lie and tell the police in a written report that you made a false statement because you were mad about having to move? You see all this stuff is slowly leaking out and you will be in front of a judge for ruining innocent people's live's because you're a sadistic, sick, white trash piece of shit that will eventually rot. I'm waiting for the day that Sean gets released and you have to explain to a judge why you did the sick, cruel things you did.You think you can play the victim here, but a court of justice is going to hear what you have to say and lies can only cover up lies for so long before the truth comes out. So continue posting lies on here you're making yourself look more and more fucken stupid each post.

sweetpea01 Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Well this definately proves he can be VERY violent and dangerous. BUT I have known a few men (one of them was my step father) who have been in prison or jail and been known to be just as violent and dangerous but have NEVER hurt a child or any of their loved ones. My step dad was one of the most dangerous men (before he died of cancer)ever known yet he never hurt me or any of my family or anyones kid. And my step dad has even killed people. The police would always call for backup anytime they knew they were being called on him. An entire town was even shut down because of him and the list just goes on and on. And no I am not proud of this by any means. Him and my mom were togoether on & off for 20 years. Why she stood by him for so long is beyond me. He did treat us very good and we never wanted for anything but the life he lived and the things he did to certain people was something you would see in a movie, or talk show or even in a book. Matter of fact some of his friends are actually in a book. Go check out the books called "Bluegrass Conspiracy" and "Helter Skelter". We lived with David Hammon who use to live with Manson long before the murders took place. David was an outlaw for many years known as David Jack. He is dead now but his name is in that book and him and my step dad ran around together for a long time. The point I am trying to make is this: I grew up in a very very strict christan home till I was about 14 and then went to live with my mom and step dad. It was a huge change in my life. Through the years I have been around and met alot of violent men and I mean some real violent men but none (that I know of) ever hurt a child. If they ever did then they are scum in my book. But what I am trying to say is just because someone is violent or has even killed someone doesn't mean they would hurt a child. I been in a marriage with a guy who was just as violent as Sean. This guy put a gun to my head and pulled the trigger. The gun was half way loaded. I believe it was a 38 but not for sure. This happened over 20 years ago. Well, when my ex pulled the trigger and seen I was still alive he said " I guess it's your lucky day bitch". He did alot of crazy stuff to me and after that happened I left but he tracked me down and this went on for a long time till he finally gave up and found someone else. But anyhow, as mean, evil hearted, dangerous, and sick as he was he never hurt any child. Tayler or whoever you are, you have put up alot of info and proof on here but I have been a victim of child abuse and rape that went on for years as a child and 3 times as an adult. It takes more than someone just saying their ex raped or beat them. There has to be some kind of proof and not just of someone's past of what they have done before they was ever with you.

sweetpea01 Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
continued...I am asking you kindly and with respect to PLEASE show proof of what Sean did to you and your kids. Was any pics taken of what had happened, any DNA , or just anything that can prove he did the things you say he did. And just so you know I am NOT one of his ex's, or someone who wants to get with him (I do have a grat man in my life) but just someone who really wants to know the cold hard truth and see actual proof that Sean did what you say he did. I am sorry but there are alot of crazy folks out here and I have known women (not many) that have made up lies about stuff like this just cause they were mad at their ex or whatever and wanted them to go to jail. And one of these cases it actually did work. She lied and he went to prison with very little proof that he did what she said he did. It's jsut stuff like this that makes me question both of you. Not just you or just Sean. I have seen several pictures on here of him with the kids and even with you in a couple of them and everyone looks so happy. The children show no fear of him in any of the family videos made. Just some things don't add up. True I wasn't there and true I don't have all the facts and stuff but you guys are posting stuff on here for all the world to see so you can't blame me for wanting to question on some things.

sweetpea01 Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
continued...I do hope that IF he really did do any of these things to you and your kids that you guys will be able to move on and put this behind you and somehow maybe even heal from this. But if you lied or even exaggerated any of this then you are just as evil as he is or anyone else that would do something like this. Every single person that has even been through something like what you have accused Sean of deserves to know the truth and nothing but the cold hard truth. And untill there is actual proof of it then you guys are dishonoring those of us that have really been through such evil violence. When people lie about stuff like this it makes it hard for the rest of us who really ahve been through it to be able to prove it. Because for one thing after so many lies have been told it makes everyone question what you say when something like this does happen to them. And believe it or not there are alot of people that don't want to deal with stuff like this either. It's really sad. There is a part of me that wants to believe you and yet another part of me hopes that this is a lie & it never did happen to you and your children. Cause this is some real serious stuff and if it really did happen it will effect you guys for the rest of your lives and I know exactly what that is like. I'd rather someone kill me than go through what I went through as a child and young adult. Most of my life has been littered with pain and the things you say Sean did. I KNOW exactly what it is like and what it can do to a person's life. It is the worst thing (other than loseing a child) for anyone to ever go through. PLEASE show proof of what Sean did to YOU AND YOUR CHILDREN. NOT PROOF OF HIS PAST ON THINGS THAT HAD NOTHING TO DO WITH YOU OR THAT HAPPEN BEFORE YOU CAME INTO HIS LIFE.

SAH Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Based on my review (I'm no super duper purveyor of law - I'll give you my best guess).

He IS GUILTY AS CHARGED. Shawn will have his number much sooner than he would like.

SAH Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Shawn *sean* himself has used this spelling MANY TIMES to law enforcement.

He needs to MAN UP.

SAH Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
"Sean Riker's profanity-laced outbursts in court, including threats to have the judge and prosecutors killed, led to his removal from the courtroom Friday January 13, 2012. He was in court for a hearing to establish that he did not wish to attend his sentencing hearing"

SAH Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Let's focus on someone who has the POTENTIAL for rehabilitation and to whom we should throw our dollars and efforts.

I'm thinking Mr. Riker is OFF the short list.

I do, however, support ANY death row inmate who can counter their conviction with evidence.

I've personally donated to a few funds in hoping that happened (LOL - used for commissary not intended for).

DO NOT GET INVOLVED UNLESS YOU HAVE NO LIFE, WANT TO BE DRAINED OF YOUR LIFE SAVINGS, HAVE NO PROBLEM BEING REJECTED BY YOUR CHILDREN, RELATIVES...EVEN EMPLOYERS.

The *funny* part is that while you are on the offensive...fighting attacks from all sides...your "MAN" already has the next one lined up. lol.

sweetpea01 Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
@SAH, who are you talking to? Me, Megan, Nicki, or all the above?

sweetpea01 Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
P.S. Do you work for the department of corrections, or worked on this case, or know any of these people in person? And why do you think Sean is quilty as charged? Is this based on his past, how he acted in court, or a little of everything or what? I did go on youtube and searched for the video of his outburst in court and it does look pretty bad on his part. But then again if it was me and i knew in my heart that I never hurt anyone I think I would go crazy too but most of all I would cry myself to death over the fact that someone would think I would hurt my own kids rather than go off on the judge and everyone. In other words I would be more hurt than angry & violent. But then again I have never been in Sean's shoes. My oldest brother was an officer for many years and was killed along with another officer all because of another guy (who is still an officer to this day) stupid choice. Anyhow, I wish he were still here because not only did he have good judgement of others but he was one of the very few that tried to help people change their lives. Don't get me wrong he wasn't afraid to get in there and fight with anyone that truly deserved to get their azz kicked but if they (inmates) treated him with respect then he gave the same back and would do anything to help. Some actually respected him and would listen to him and did change their lives for the better and some didn't and was very foolish. When I was at my brother's funeral there was over 400 people but most of them were officers and some ex inmates. And most of those inmates told me how my brother helped and inspired them to change for the better. They learned alot form him and respected him. To make a long story short I believe ALL people make mistakes. I also believe anyone can change if they truly want to. There is good and bad in every kind and everywhere you go. It is the sick that need God the most and yes I do believe in God. I am no saint by any means. I'll be the first to admit I make mistakes every day and fall short but I don't give up, I try to learn, and I try to do what is right. I also try not to place judgement on others untill I know for a fact of what they done. I hope you are not baseing your thoughts on Seans past but only on what you know to be a fact and what is true. If Sean really did do all those things to his ex and their children then he deserves to be locked up and I hope he will get help. However, if he really is innocent of these crimes then he should be cleared of them. Right or wrong this is just how I feel untill I see more proof that he actually did do the things Tayler said he did. Most of all I just hope the children are safe and sound now.

sweetpea01 Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Psychologist: Children MAY have been influenced by wife, investigators

November 10, 2011 2:01 pm • KRISTEN ZAMBO kristen.zambo@journaltimes.com


Dr. Thomas Schacht, a psychologist, testifies for the defense in Sean Riker's trial in Racine County Circuit Court, Thursday, November 10, 2011 / Mark Hertzberg mhertzberg@journaltimes.com


RACINE - A former Wind Lake man accused of abusing his wife and children he lived with for three years across two states opted not to testify in his own defense Thursday in a Racine County courtroom.

But before making that decision during his fourth day of trial, Sean Riker, 43, posed a question to Racine County Circuit Judge Wayne Marik.

"My record can be brought up if I get on the stand?" asked Riker, who was convicted more than a decade ago in federal court for a string of bombings in 1995 in Utah.

Reports show an elementary school was one of the handful of sites bombed in Utah - just months after the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building was bombed in Oklahoma City. No one was injured in the bombings for which Riker was convicted.

Riker was sentenced last December to 7 1/2 years in state prison for escape, felony criminal damage to property, misdemeanor criminal damage to property and disorderly conduct. Riker was sentenced for breaking out of his cell in January 2010 at the Racine County Jail.

Marik told him some information could be shared with jurors if he chose to testify. Riker quickly decided not to testify.

( Why did Sean decide not to testify)??

That capped a day during which two defense experts testified that Riker's now-former wife, a prosecution psychologist and child abuse investigators may have influenced how children spoke of their experiences with Riker. Defense attorneys tried to show jurors - through two of their psychologists' testimony - that there is reasonable doubt Riker repeatedly abused his wife and children he lived with while living in Wind Lake and Utah. Riker only could be convicted in Racine County of crimes that occurred here.

Tennessee psychologist Thomas Schacht testified Thursday that the psychologist they talked with in December 2009 - when the girls were pre-teens - didn't fully explore whether they were pressured "to say certain things."

sweetpea01 Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
continued...n"(One child) referred to what (Tayler Riker) said or what (Tayler Riker) wrote," said Schacht, a professor at East Tennessee State University. "There is TREMENDOUS confusion about what the child personally experienced and what she read about."

Riker's former wife, Tayler Riker, and children he lived with testified earlier this week about his punishments, beatings and alleged sexual abuse and misconduct they endured while living with him in Wisconsin from Nov. 3, 2009, to Nov. 10, 2009, and in Utah prior to moving to Wind Lake.

Riker is charged with more than a dozen counts, which include charges of first-degree recklessly endangering safety; possession of a firearm by a felon; possession of a short-barreled rifle; sexual assault of a child; first-degree sexual assault of a child younger than 13; battery; strangulation and suffocation; child abuse; and causing mental harm to a child. If convicted of every charge, he faces up to 168 1/2 years behind bars.

"I do NOT believe (Sean Riker) caused either daughter significant or substantial harm. Going into the marriage , the children were on pretty shaky ground to begin with," forensic psychologist Michael Kula testified.

Tayler Riker testified Wednesday that she met Riker while he still was in federal prison. She said she married Sean Riker in 2006, immediately after his release from prison. They then had a daughter and son.

Racine County prosecutors have said Sean Riker had connections with a Nazi motorcycle gang and the Aryan Brotherhood.

Kula said one child told the prosecution psychologist that Riker "‘when in jail, makes me nervous when he comes home'" and that "she found him as a mean person." Kula never met nor interviewed the girls, but said he reviewed the initial psychologist's notes and file.

But during cross-examination by Assistant District Attorney Patricia Hanson, Kula admitted that one method he used to determine if a child was sexually abused was their responses to being shown a series of ink blots.

The trial is set to continue Friday morning at the Law Enforcement Center, 717 Wisconsin Ave

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
sweetpea01:
It did happen. Imagine how I feel having other women who were not a part of my marriage and not alone in my home with Sean telling me that I'm a liar. Imagine the pain that I endured with Sean and now the new hell that I live every day by being accused of lying, and by another domestic violence survivor no less. You really should be ashamed of yourself. I mean that as calmly as possible. Shame on you for continuing to allow Sean to hurt me.
The proof of what Sean did was presented in court. 12 unbiased jurors from a city and state where we knew nobody accepted it and convicted him of it. All 16 charges, no exceptions. You women are the only ones who think there is this great chance at him being innocent of everything. The jurors had no qualms about his guilt after being in the courtroom for the entire trial. I am not posting that information again because it is private and includes private information about my young children. I don't have to prove anything to you to make you staying out of my business the right thing to do. I proved it in a court of law and Sean's doing 200 years now. There's my proof. Accept or just leave me and this situation alone. Be Sean's friend, send him money, support him with cards ect. But do not tell me I am lying, tell me that my children are lying or make statements about a marriage and life you were not a part of. I owe you nothing. You owe me basic respect of privacy.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Second, (Gary) Collins claimed to have heard through the prison grapevine, albeit after the stabbing, that Riker had given Jordan the shank to "hit" Stone. Vol. XIV, at 371.

http://ca10.washburnlaw.edu/cases/2007/05/06-1161.htm

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Copied transcription of “Wisconsin Inmates are an Enigma to Me” By Sean Riker Sept. 10, 2012.:
My own opinions are (UPPERCASE) for your reading enjoyment.

I was born and raised in San Bernardino, Calif which is probably the reason I spent most of my life in prison starting at the age of 13 (RIGHT? BECAUSE EVERYONE WHO GROWS UP IN SAN BERDO SPENDS THEIR LIFE IN PRISON). As a juvenile I was “trained” at the notorious youth-training school in Chino, Calif. At age 18 I graduated to state “Big Boy” prison: Chino, Salano, Vacaville and Pelican Bay. I stayed out for about 4 years from 1991-1995-ish (WOW! WAY TO SHOW HOW LONG YOU CAN STAY OUT OF PRISON, YOU MANAGED ABOUT FOUR YEARS) and then went on a bombing spree in St. George Utah. I was upset about the whole polygamy thing and them having sex with children. I frowned upon it, to say the least. I bombed a bunch of places that I didn’t like. (SEAN, YOU BOMBED A ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, A BOOKSTORE OWNED BY TWO GAY MEN AND DIXIE AUTO STORE. WHAT DID AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL HAVE TO DO WITH YOUR CONTEMPT FOR FUNDAMENTALIST MORMONS?) Unfortunately the feds from on bombings, through a mistake of my own and a DVD fuse in a bomb I blew myself up in a car bombing. I was wearing baggy surfer shorts and flo-jo sandals, nothing else when the car exploded I flew easily 15 feet in the air. Everything was in slow motion. My body was twisting in the air like a cat trying to land on its feet. I finally landed on my butt hard, The adrenaline kicked in and I was on my feet and running down main street with smoke barreling from my body. I looked like something out of a comedy skit. I was screaming to my girlfriend (PAULA ROBERTS CASTILLIO) “I’m on fire!! Run! Run!” I wasn’t really on fire but I thought I was. We ran all of the way home.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
I looked in the mirror and I was covered in black soot and my hair was compacted to my head like a plastic helmet. Every single hair on my body was gone. Even my pubic hair. I pealed my head hair off and took a shower. I didn’t have one burn or scratch on my whole body. A miracle. But the feds went door-to-door to every house in the neighborhood and the only door that didn’t get answered was mine. They eventually raided my house and I went to prison for 12 years. (YOU WERE ALSO FOUND TO HAVE A STOLEN SAFE IN YOUR HOME FROM A LOCAL BURGLARY) Which brings me to my title-story.
As I’ve said I’ve spent most of my life in prison. I learned since TYS that there is a convict code to follow. Through all of my yeas of prison, the “Home Boys” and I prayed on inmates with cases that were unfavorable to the strict convict code. No violent act against those who violated the code was too strict. (INCLUDING MURDER OF DAVID STONE? INCLUDING BEATING YOUR WIFE AND HER CHILDREN FOR MAKING A MESS OR TOUCHING SOMETHING OF YOURS) “No mercy” is the sentence. For 30 years I have lived that code and enforced it to the fullest extent. (BUT WE ARE ALL SUPPOSE TO NOW BELIEVE THAT FOR THE TIME FROM 2006-2009 YOU WERE A PERFECT ANGEL AND NEVER ONCE LAYED A VIOLENT HAND ON YOUR WIFE OR HER CHILDREN DURING THAT TIME) I can’t go into detail about the punishments because “BTB” is rated PG but you can imagine what went on. (LIKE MURDER? MURDERING DAVID STONE AND FRAMING MARK JORDAN, SEAN? LIKE THAT KIND OF STUFF) I SPENT MY ADULT LIFE IN California state and federal penitentiaries. All of the prisons max and supermax custody.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
The guys who violated the code were given once chance to prove that their case(s) are wrongful convicting. That means they turn over all paperwork for inspection; police report, discovery, trial transcripts, Doctors reports, ect…the paperwork would get thoroughly read and if there was absolute proof of the inmates guilt they would get ‘dealt’ with. If an inmate refused to show paperwork that’s considered guilt and he gets punished. Understand? There’s no ‘privacy’ in prison. Every inmate must remain an open book. It’ doesn’t matter if you want to abide by the rules or not. (HOW NICE, AT LEAST YOUR TRUE COLORS ARE SHINING THROUGH NOW) Fact: Inmates run the prisons.
ENTER WISCONSIN
In 2006 I was released from federal prison after serving 12 years of a 12 year sentence. (NOT TRUE. LINK TO MUG SHOT FROM SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH http://mugshots.com/US-Counties/Utah/Salt-Lake-County-UT/Sean-Anthony-Riker.7044961.html DATED 2/1/1996. MUGSHOT FROM SALT LAKE COUNTY, UTAH http://mugshots.com/US-Counties/Utah/Salt-Lake-County-UT/Sean-Anthony-Riker.7044962.html DATED 9/4/2006. THESE DATES GIVE AN INTERMEDIATE TIME OF 10 ½ YEARS. WHICH MEANS IT IS SIMPLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR YOU TO HAVE SERVED 12 YEARS ON YOUR 12 YEAR SENTENCE. NICE TRY THOUGH) I lost all of my good-time because I “dealt” with those who violate the convict code. No biggie. But when I walked uot of those doors I knew I would never see prison from the inside looking out.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
I was 38 and done with stupid crime. (BUT YOU STOLE QUARTERS FROM CAR WASHES, A RV FROM A DEALERSHIP IN ST. GEORGE, UTAH. YOU STOLE TRAILORS FROM AROUND THE SALT LAKE VALLEY AND BURNED ON IN THE FIELDS OUT NEAR TOOELE UTAH. YOU RAMMED A FORKLIFT THROUGH THE SIDE OF ARCH ALUMINUM AND GLASS AND STORE THE CHRISTMAS MONEY FOR THE EMPLOYEES) I got married to a stank-trailortrash-girl (THANKS FOR THE COMPLIMENT) the day I got out. (LIE, YOU WERE RELEASED FROM FEDERAL PRISON IN MAY OF 2006, YOU WERE MARRIED IN NOVEMBER 2006) We had two kids whom I am just crazy about. During our horrible 4 years together (can learning what a low life my wife is) I had a job where I flew up the totem pole to a “consultants” position. (LIE, YOU WERE NIGHT WAREHOUSE MANAGER). I was making 52k a year (LIE, PLEASE SEE ABOVE POST ABOUT SEAN’S JOB TITLE AND WAGES) and flying to various plants across the US to trouble-shoot. I had because a success story. Not only was it my first job ever but I was a convicted felon and “serial bomber”. Not only that, I took my trailor-trash wife, who thought “menses” puddled on the bed-sheets for weeks at a time was “okey-dokey-fine”, to a good life. (I HAD ANYTHING BUT A GOOD LIFE WITH YOU SEAN RIKER. I HAD A HORRIBLE LIFE WITH YOU) I took a a----and changed it to a Rolls Royce ife. I learned the hard way: You can take trailor trash out of the trailor park but you can’t take the trash out of the trailer park mentality.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
(I ALSO LEARNED THE HARD WAY SEAN. I LEARNED THAT A MAN WHO SPENT OVER A DECADE OF HIS LIFE IN PRISON ENFORCING A NO-MERCY POLICY AGAINST OTHER PRISONERS CANNOT EVER BECOME A GOOD MAN, HUSBAND OR FATHER. I LEARNED A HORRBILY PAINFULL LIFE LESSON THAT YOUR TOUGH GUY ACT IN PRISON WOULD BE IMPLEMENTED ON ALL THOSE AROUND YOU AND WOULDN’T STAY IN PRISON. THANK YOU FOR THAT LESSON. THANK YOU FOR THE BEATINGS, THE BEATINGS TO MY CHILDREN, THANK YOU FOR SEXUALLY ABUSING THEM YOU SICK FUCK, THANK YOU FOR BREAKING ME DOWN TO A LEVEL OF HUMAN DESPAIR I WOULDN’T WISH ON ANYONE- INCLUDING THESE DUMB CHICKS WHO CUSS ME OUT AND STAND UP FOR YOU BUT DON’T KNOW YOU AT ALL) “She” and I never got along. I stayed with her because I loved my kids. She stayed with me because I gave her a good comfortable life. (SUCH LAME STATEMENTS)
In 2009 we moved to Wisconsin because I was given a plant of my own with 100 employees under me, a fat raise, paid move and it was a huge promotion. (LIE AGAIN, PLEASE SEE ABOVE POST ABOUT SEAN’S $22/HOUR WAGE, NIGHT WAREHOUSE MANAGER TITLE, NO PAID MOVE, NO RAISE AT ALL FOR MOVING TO WISCONSIN AND MAYBE A DOZEN EMPLOYEES UNDER HIM, NOT 100) We were here 4 days. She called the police and fabricated horrendous lies of abuse against me and my children. I was arrested with zero evidence to support the lies. (ZERO EVIDENCE? THEN WHY DOES YOU PRISONINMATES.COM PERSONAL PROFILE SAY AND I QUOTE “THROUGH NEWLY OBTAINED DNA EVIDENCE THAT PROVES MY INNOCENCE…” WAS THERE EVIDENCE AT TRIAL TO CONVICT YOU OR NOT SEAN. THIS IS PRETTY OBVIOUSLY A LIE ON YOUR PART. PLEASE STEP YOUR GAME UP ON THIS SHIT)

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
I had more evidence proving my innocence than the cops had of my “guilt”. (HOW’D THAT WORK OUT FOR YOU IN TRIAL SEAN? SINCE YOU WERE CONVICTED ON EVERYTHING) But I had a record and she didn’t. The mayberry cops believed every word my wife spewed from her yuck-mouth. I was voncited and sentenced to 200 years. She got everything in the divorce (that I filed) and it was a lot. (IT WAS A MOTORCYCLE AND $187 IN CASH. OH, AND STOLEN TOOLS AND A STOLEN GENERATOR AND SOME OTHER RANDOM STOLE THINGS LIKE A MATTRES S FROM THE RV IN SARATOGA SPRINGS, UTAH AND A STOLEN TV FROM THE CELL PHONE TOWER IN SARATOGA SPRINGS, UTAH. CALL THE POLICE DEPT THERE AND ASK THEM ABOUT IT) By the way, soon after my arrest she moved to Fort Collins, Colorado and savagely abused my kids. They went to foster homes where one remains today because the abuse was so horrendous. (WHERE TO BEGIN. YOU STUPID FUCK, THE KIDS ARE FUCKED UP FROM YOUR ABUSE. HORRENDOUS ABUSE ON MY PART. WHY ARE YOU IN PRISON FOR 200 YEARS AND I’M OUT AND FREE AND IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH EVERYTHING AND MY COUNTY LIKES ME AND BOUGHT ME A FUCKING HOUSE SO I COULD MOVE AWAY FROM YOU AND YOUR HELL. THIS COUNTY MOVED ME AND GOT ME A HOUSE TO HIDE FROM YOU. YEAH, THEY SURE HATE ME AND THINK I’M A SAVAGE ABUSER)

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
ENTER WISCONSIN PRISON
I was going to prison with charges I had been punishing inmates for 30 years for. I was never worried because I knew I was innocent and my paperwork blatantly screams, “SET UP!”. But I have/had my back against the wall ready to fight to the death should the occasion arise. During my county jail stay, while I fought my case, I was an alleged berserker to say the least. (THAT’S PUTTING IT MIDLY. PLEASE READ FULL TRANSCRIPT ABOUT SEAN’S BEHAVIOR AT THE RACINE COUNTY JAIL HERE http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/wisconsin/wiedce/2:2010cv00906/54450/46/?1342279871 ) It’s alleged that every chance I got I was beating up cops, escaping and just plain old wreaking havoc non-stop. (NOT ALLEGED, YOU WERE CONVICTED OF ESCAPE AND THE VIDEO OF YOU ACTUALLY ESCAPING IS HERE http://www.journaltimes.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/inmate-bent-steel-door-enough-to-get-out-of-cell/article_11ba6d74-023d-11df-ad48-001cc4c002e0.html ) (IF) it’s true, do you think that may be it’s because I was wrongfully accused?? (TOTALLY LEGIT ARGUMENT THERE SEAN, TOTALLY UNDERSTANDABLE NOW. –SARCASTIC) How would you react after beat the odds of recidivism, succeeded in life, job, had children you loved very much whom were ripped from your life dur to lies and were savagely abused at the hands of your accuser? Hmmmm? How would you react?? So while I’m in the county jail it’s alleged I’m a ‘bezerker’. Little did I know wich every incident at the county jail, the media were writing stories about me in the news and the newspapers.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
There no one more /up’ on the world news than inmates. Before I left county jail, I was notoriously infamous celebrity even cops were in awe of me, a few asked me to write a book about my story. (BARF, THE EGO HERE IS LAUGHABLE. COPS IN AWE OF YOU. MAYBE YOUR PHYSICAL STRENGH BUT COME ON. BTW, WHERE’S THE BOOK OF YOUR LIFE. I’M SURE WE’D ALL LOVE TO SEE IT) (I did, it’s 700 pages and waiting to be put into a manuscript so I can sell it). When I left county jail I was literally secure like the fictional character Hannibal Lector and drove to “Dodge” receiving center with an escort of two cop cars with lights flashing and the coppers with ar-ig rifles on their laps. I thought it was ridiculous. Lames. When I entered dodge I was taken to the security unit. As I walked into the unit someone yelled, “That’s Sean Riker!!” In a matter of seconds everybody’s faces were in the door windows. Immediately ‘cat calls’ rang out. I was expecting death threats but only head applause, encouragement support and an exultant reverential respect. All I could do was nod like royalty and bow a little since I was trussed up like Lector. (HOW GRACIOUS OF YOU) I SPENT 21 DAYS IN DODGE WITH A STATUS LIKE Jesus Christ. They had to have known what my charges are. And yet I was God to them. I was and am inan Alien world. I was transferred to Wisconsin only supermax where the hardest of the hard core are housed. As I drove up to the supermax I said to myself that this is where I will have to fight to the death. I was processed quickly and led down a long corridor with cells lining each side. Immediately someone yelled, “Whats up Riker?!” And from there the corridor because an eacho chamger of respect for me.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
I’ve been on 24 hour lock down here for almost 2 years. I have only spoken to one inmate whom I’ve come to love as a brother. When someone tries to speak to me (inmates) I have them a look that would suggest I’m looking at my skank wife eating a platter of feces. I give no one the time of day because they are all abominations of the convict code (DID YOU FORGET YOU SNITCHED AND WERE IN PROTECTIVE CUSTODY IN THE FEDERAL PRISON SYSTEM AND YOU WROTE A MOTION IN FEDERAL COURT ASKING TO BE MOVED BECAUSE YOU WERE IN IMMINENT DANGER. HELLO? SEAN ARE YOU THERE? THIS IS CRAZY SHIT, YOU ARE THE ABSOLUTE DEFINITION OF A PRISON SNITCH AND YOU’RE LAMBLASTING OTHER INMATES FOR BEING AN ABOMINATION TO THE CONVICT CODE) I have never seen a weaker group of inmates with a combined unconscious mind-set. (WEAK INMATES? THEN WHY DID YOU WRITE IN A FEDERAL LAWSUIT THAT YOU NEEDED 2 MILLION DOLLARS BECAUSE YOU WERE AFRAID FOR YOUR LIFE IN WI PRISON AND YOU WERE SCARED EVERYDAY) I shouldn’t be revered (DON’T WORRY, YOU’RE NOT BY ANYONE WITH A BRAIN) I should be reviled and be asked to turn over my paperwork to see what proof I have of my innocence. But instead they worship me and give me unearned respect. In my book everyone here are lames. There’s only guy who asked me for my paperwork and that’s the guy I call my brother. He read every inch of my paperwork and wholeheartedly believes I’m innocent. He is now and advocate of my character and innocence.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
By the way, he’s serving life without for killing a guy who was doing what I was accused of so having him on my side speaks volumes) (NATHAN LINDELL WAS CONVICTED OF MURDING A 60 something-YEAR-OLD MAN IN HIS HOME WHILE HE SLEPT WITH HIS BROTHER AND ANOTHER MAN. THEY BURGLARIZED HIS HOME AS THEY HAD DONE PREVIOUSLY AND SET IT ON FIRE TO COVER IT UP. THE OLD MAN HAD A LARGE COIN COLLECTION. YOU SEAN RIKER ARE A LIAR. NATHAN IS NOT SOME SAINT FOR KILLING A CHILD MOLESTER. HE IS A LOW LIFE DRUG ADDICT AND PETTY THIEF WHO COMMITTED A MURDER ON A 60 YEAR OLD MAN IN HIS HOME WITH THIS THUG BROTHER AND FRIEND. FULL INFO HERE http://www.wicourts.gov/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17556 )
I no longer follow the convict code (YEAH, WE KNOW) because there’s not one to follow here in Wisconsin. I will not ask anyone for paperwork. I will not punish anyone for their alleged crimes. I will not dnothing because “Nothing” is what they will do to me. I might spend….(I DID NOT PRINT THE ADDITIONAL PAGE SO THIS ENDS HERE.)

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Sean says he loves Angel and said 143 forever baby to her above. How nice of him. Because in December of 2011 Angel committed suicide supposedly for the reason of being so heart-broken about Sean’s wrongful conviction. But in October of 2012 Sean had posted on his PrisonInmates.com website the following:
“I never through I would experience love again but now I know I will. Through this website I hope to find my soul mate and someone to grow old with. I’m a non-smoker, non-druggie and non-drinker. I’m looking for someone with intelligence, a sense of human, manners, great hygienic values and a great personality. Are you out there??? “
Sean, you one-time fiancé and love of your life killed herself for her love for you. That’s some real Romeo and Juliet type shit right there. Real deep, ya know. But less than a year later, LESS THAN A YEAR LATER, you were back on the dating scene pounding the pavement and looking for a new love again. Someone killed themselves for you in an act of love and you are moving on to the next less than a year later. What the fuck does that say about you. A real genuine man like Megan likes to say, huh.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
SEAN A. RIKER,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 10-C-906
SHERIFF ROBERT CARLSON, et al.,
Defendants.
DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On October 13, 2010, the plaintiff, Sean A. Riker (“Riker”), proceeding pro se, filed a
complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging civil rights violations while incarcerated in the Racine
County Jail. Riker claims that Sheriff Robert Carlson (“Carlson”), Captain Douglas Wearing
(“Wearing”), Chief Deputy John Hanrahan (“Hanrahan”), Lt. Kevin Brown (“Brown”), and Sheriff
Deputy Christopher Schmaling (“Schmaling”), all of whom were persons involved in his
incarceration at the Racine County Jail, violated his right to due process by placing him in
administrative segregation and violated the constitutional prohibition against cruel and unusual
punishment in relation to his conditions of confinement. (Docket No. 1.) Riker claims that the 24
hour lockdown has resulted in multiple physical and emotional injuries. (Id.) Accompanying his
complaint was a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Docket No. 2.) The matter was
randomly assigned to this court and the parties have consented to full jurisdiction of a magistrate
judge. (Docket Nos. 6, 15, 16.) The court screened Ricker’s complaint and permitted him to proceed

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
with claims regarding his conditions of confinement and whether his due process rights were
violated. (Docket No. 13.) The court dismissed the Racine County Jail as a defendant. (Docket No.
13.)
The defendants submitted a timely answer to the complaint raising affirmative defenses.
(Docket No. 14.) Riker then submitted a request for an order setting a deadline for the defendants to
respond to his complaint. (Docket No. 19.) The court found Riker’s request moot because the
defendants had answered the complaint within the deadlines set forth in Federal Rules of Civil
Procedure. (Docket No. 20.) Riker then filed a motion for the court to order the defendants to
disclose requested discovery, alleging that his request for all e-mails regarding his 24 hour
confinement had not been met. (Docket No. 23.) Riker also submitted a request for representation
by a court appointed attorney. (Docket No. 26.) The court denied Riker’s motion to compel on the
grounds that his request for any and all e-mail messages about his 24 hour confinement over a
thirteen month period was overly broad, and a search of thirteen months of e-mails would be
burdensome. (Docket No. 27.) Further, Riker’s request for a court appointed attorney was also
denied on the basis that he failed to meet the requirement of establishing his unsuccessful attempts
to obtain legal counsel on his own, and that he demonstrated competence to represent himself.
(Docket No. 27.) Riker then filed another motion to appoint counsel, this time including evidence of
his attempts to retain representation. (Docket No. 29.) The court denied the motion, acknowledging
that even though Riker satisfied the requirement to attempt to retain counsel, assessing the nature
and difficulty of the case, he demonstrated sufficient competence to represent himself and the
appointment of counsel would not make a difference in the outcome of the case. (Docket No. 30.)
Riker requested the court reconsider based on his professed lack of legal proceedings and ability to
engage in legal research. (Docket No. 31.) The court denied Riker’s request for reconsideration.
(Docket No. 33.)

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
On January 29, 2012, the defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (Docket No. 35).
The defendants submitted their proposed findings of fact, (Docket No. 36), and a brief in support of
the motion for summary judgment, (Docket No. 37.) Riker responded by alleging that the
defendants’ submissions are confusing and that the facts set forth in the supporting affidavits are
“falsehoods.” (Docket No. 41.)
II. SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD
“The court shall grant summary judgment if the movant shows that there is no genuine
dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R.
Civ. P. 56(a); see also Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986); Celotex Corp. v.
Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 324 (1986); McNeal v. Macht, 763 F. Supp. 1458, 1460-61 (E.D. Wis. 1991).
Material facts are those facts which, under the governing substantive law, might affect the outcome
of the suit. Anderson, 477 U.S. at 248. A dispute of such material facts is “genuine” if the evidence
is such that a reasonable trier of fact could find in favor of the nonmoving party. Id.
The movant bears the burden to establish that there is no genuine issue of material fact and
that he or she is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a); Adickes v. S.H. Kress
& Co., 398 U.S. 144, 159 (1970); see also Celotex Corp., 477 U.S. at 323. The moving party
satisfies its burden by demonstrating “that there is an absence of evidence to support the nonmoving
party’s case.” Celotex Corp., 477 U.S. at 325. Any doubt as to the existence of a genuine issue for
trial is resolved against the moving party. Anderson, 477 U.S. at 255; Cain v. Lane, 857 F.2d 1139,
1142 (7th Cir. 1988); Spring v. Sheboygan Area School Dist., 865 F.2d 883, 886 (7th Cir. 1989).
Further, “on summary judgment, a court can neither make a credibility determination nor choose
between competing interests.” Sarsha v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 3 F.3d 1035, 1041 (7th Cir. 1993).

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
If the moving party meets its burden, the nonmoving party then has the burden to present
specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue of material fact. Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co.,
Ltd. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 586-87 (1986).
III. FACTS
According to the defendants’ submissions in support of summary judgment, which Riker has
failed to appropriately contest, Riker was booked in to the Racine County Jail on November 11,
2009, being held on numerous felony charges including multiple counts of First Degree Recklessly
Endangering Safety, Possession of a Firearm by a Felon, Strangulation and Suffocation, Child
Abuse—Causing Mental Harm, and Child Abuse—Intentionally Causing Harm. (Docket No. 36,
¶1-2.) While awaiting trial, Racine County Jail staff initially housed Riker in administrative
segregation due to the potential safety and security threat he posed within the jail. (Docket No. 36, ¶
3.) The Racine County Jail policy regarding administrative segregation provides that the decision to
place someone in segregation can be based on purely subjective evaluations and predictions of
future behavior or on informed predictions based on past behavior. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 25.)
Segregation is designed to help protect those threatened by the behavior of the inmate as well to
protect the inmate himself. (Id.) An inmate who displays or threatens aggressive behavior towards
staff or other inmates or has any sort of disciplinary problem may need administrative segregation.
(Id.)
Internal investigation revealed that Riker subscribed to a white supremacist ideology, the
expression of which could pose a threat to the safety of other inmates, jail staff, or Riker himself
due to the ethnic and racial diversity of the general population. (Id ¶ 3.) Riker’s assignment to
administrative segregation was done as a precautionary measure, pursuant to jail policy, in an effort
to maintain the safety and security of the jail environment. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 4.) Inmates in
administrative segregation are allowed to have one hour per day outside their cell to shower, use the

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
phone, and exercise in the day room. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 5.) On November 28, 2009, Riker filed an
inmate request/complaint demanding to be placed in general population, to which Sheriff Thompson
responded and advised Riker that his classification was to ensure jail security and safety and his
classification would be reviewed every ten days. (Docket No. 36, ¶¶ 6-7.)
On December 20, 2009, Riker flooded his cell and broke the seat off his desk, then pounded
the heavy metal seat against the cell door, causing jail staff to transfer him to a different cell.
(Docket No. 36, ¶ 8.) On December 29, 2009, during a meeting with a mental health worker, Riker
broke a cell door and shouted racial slurs, which were directed at other inmates. (Docket No. 36, ¶
9.) On December 31, 2009, Riker was yelling at inmates from day rooms 2 and 3, and Officer
Hernandez advised Riker to stand down. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 10.) Riker refused to stand down and
yelled to “get those niggers away from the windows” and asked Officer Hernandez for “any nigger
to kill.” (Id.) Riker also threatened to kick Officer Hernandez’s “ass.” (Id.) On January 2, 2010,
Riker threatened staff members standing guard during his shower, specifically telling Sergeant
Gonzales that “I’m gonna catch you when you don’t have five people around you. I’m gonna
remember your face you fucking spic, and you’re gonna remember mine.” (Docket No. 36, ¶ 11.)
On January 6, 2010, Riker forced his solid cell door open by kicking the door with such
force that the welds broke, and was then able to push the lower portion from its track, allowing him
to exit the cell. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 12.) After exiting the cell, Riker used a metal electrical junction
box he pried from the wall to break six cell windows, two day room windows, and nine light
fixtures, depriving the jail of the use of eight cells for approximately one month. (Id.) That same
day, command staff met to formulate an action plan for safely housing Riker to prevent further
damage to the facility but in a manner in which he would not be able to carry out his threats.
(Docket 36, ¶ 13.) At the meeting, the command staff decided Riker needed to be housed by himself
in a modified cell and two man day room on administrative segregation status for safety and

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
security reasons shown from his multiple and continued violent outbursts and threats. (Docket 36, ¶
14.) These cell modifications included preemptive removal of items to prevent Riker from using
them as weapons against people or to damage property. (Id.) In addition to the removal of items
from his cell, Riker would be allowed to be out of his cell only with the Correctional Emergency
Response Team (“CERT”) standing by for showering and phone use, (Docket No. 36, ¶ 15), during
which time his cell would be cleaned and searched, (Docket No. 36, ¶ 16). The staff also determined
that Riker would not be allowed in the dayroom without leg irons and belly chains, and made
special security measures for transporting him to and from the courthouse. (Docket No. 36, ¶¶ 17-
18.) Riker claims that the belly chains and leg irons caused him severe physical injuries due to the
way he had to position his body to use the phone and the mental strain of administrative segregation
and limited recreation time caused severe mental and psychological injury. (Docket No. 1.)
Following these security measures, Riker again on January 12, 2010 tampered with a
sprinkler head but was stopped and secured to a body board when he threatened to disarm a guard
carrying a taser. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 19.) On January 22, 2010, he was transferred to a cell on “2D”,
where he remained for the rest of his time at the Racine County Jail. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 20.) Once in
2D, due to Riker’s prior threats, acts of violence, and repeated property damage, it was determined
that Riker would be allowed out of his cell on only Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays during first
shift, in which he was allowed to use the common room/day room for recreation while the CERT
team supervised him. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 21.) On July 28, 2010, Riker was out of his

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
cell for shower
and exercise when he slipped out of his belly chain. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 24.) Riker yelled racial
epithets at black inmates in nearby day rooms as he swung the belly chain around, using the stillattached
padlock to damage windows of the neighboring day rooms. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 24.)
Lt. Brown conducted periodic reviews concerning Riker’s administrative segregation status,
but Riker remained housed in administrative segregation for the remainder of his time at Racine
7
County Jail due to continued threats towards inmates and staff and destruction of property. (Docket
No. 36, ¶¶ 22-23.)
IV. ANALYSIS
Riker claims the defendants violated his Eighth Amendment right against cruel and unusual
punishment and his Fourteenth Amendment right to due process. It appears that Riker, while in the
Racine County Jail and during the time of the alleged constitutional violations, was a pretrial
detainee. As a pretrial detainee, both claims will be analyzed under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Jackson v Ill. Medi-Car, Inc., 300 F.3d 760, 764 (7th Cir. 2002). The constitutional rights of a
pretrial detainee are derived from the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and are
distinguishable from an inmate’s right not to be subjected to cruel and unusual punishment under
the Eighth Amendment. Board v. Farnham, 394 F.3d 469, 477 (7th Cir. 2005) (citing Bell v Wolfish,
441 U.S. 520, 535 (1979)). Although the Eighth Amendment does not apply to pretrial detainees,
detainees are entitled to at least as much protection as the constitution provides convicted prisoners.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Id. (internal citations omitted). Although there is a distinction, it is of little significance in
application, and courts have found it appropriate to use the same standard for claims arising out of
both the Eighth Amendment (convicted prisoners) and the Fourteenth Amendment (pretrial
detainees). Id. (citing Henderson v. Sheahan, 195 F.3d 839, 845 (7th Cir. 1999)).
A. Plaintiff’s Due Process Claim
The court begins its analysis with Riker’s claim that his placement in administrative
segregation upon booking, without an initial hearing, and his continued segregation status
throughout his stay at the Racine County Jail, was a deprivation of due process. “A person has a
liberty interest in avoiding placement in a status that is atypical and imposes a significant hardship
on the inmate in relation to the ordinary incidents of prison life.” Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472,
484 (1995). If a liberty interest exists, then due process requires informal, non-adversarial, but
8
periodic review of the confinement. Alston v. DeBruyn, 13 F.3d 1036, 1042 (7th Cir. 1994) (citing
Kentucky Dept. of Corrections v. Thompson, 490 U.S. 454, 462-63 (1989); Hewitt v. Helms, 459
U.S. 460, 472 (1983)). A condition of confinement may be imposed on a pretrial detainee without
violating the due process clause if it is reasonably related to a legitimate and non-punitive
governmental goal; it may not be arbitrary or purposeless. Antonelli v. Sheahan, 81 F.3d 1422, 1428
(7th Cir. 1996) (citing United States v. Salerno, 481 U.S. 739, 747 (1987)). Safety and preventing
danger to the community are legitimate governmental goals that outweigh an individual’s liberty
interest, depending upon the circumstances. Id. A pretrial detainee has a right to due process before
conditions or restrictions are imposed upon him only if those restrictions or conditions amount to
punishment of the detainee. Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 536 (1979).
In the case at hand, Riker was placed in administrative, non-disciplinary segregation
immediately upon booking. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 3.) This was done for safety and security reasons that

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
the jail staff identified during the preliminary internal investigations. (Docket No. 39, ¶ 4.) There is
a liberty interest in avoiding placement in a status that is atypical, but there is nothing atypical about
Riker’s placement. According to Racine County Jail policy, inmates are placed in administrative
segregation for a multitude of reasons, including potential safety risks to the general population.
(Docket No. 36, ¶ 25.) Also, according to the policy, a subjective evaluation of potential future risk
is a reason for placement in administrative segregation. (Id.) The Racine County Jail staff, which
identified and evaluated potential future risks regarding Riker in general population, acted in
accordance with the jail’s own policy in placing Riker in administrative segregation. Riker was not
deprived of any liberty interest he possessed because his placement was in accordance

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Riker was not
deprived of any liberty interest he possessed because his placement was in accordance with the
policy governing all persons detained at the jail. Riker was dealt with in accordance with that policy
and therefore, his placement cannot be considered “atypical.”
9
Of course, Riker has a liberty interest in avoiding placement for no reason or for reasons that
are baseless. This is where adherence to the jail policy regarding placement in administrative
segregation is critical. Given the facts of this case, the policy was followed and Riker’s placement
was warranted. There is no due process violation because Riker’s placement and subsequent
conditions were reasonably related to a non-punitive governmental goal—safety to the general
prison community, staff and inmates alike. Riker’s placement was not punishment for any conduct,
but was done for his benefit and the benefit of his fellow inmates and the prison staff. The staff
recognized the potential security and safety risks that could result from Riker’s expression of his
racist attitudes within the ethnically and racially diverse general prison population. The staff was
legitimately concerned that Riker’s continued presence in the general population would be the fuel
to create an explosive situation, endangering the safety of inmates, staff, and Riker. The safety risks
to the prison community presented by Riker’s attitudes and behavior far outweigh any liberty
interest Riker may have had in avoiding placement. Since this is a legitimate goal and jail policy
was followed, there is no violation of due process.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Riker, along with his initial placement, also complains of his continued segregation status
with limiting conditions, and continued denials of requests to be in general population. Riker was
not deprived of any procedure since his status was reviewed periodically, every 10-14 days, and his
continued requests were read and considered. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 22.) Wearing instructed Brown to
conduct these reviews, and they were carried out. (Docket No. 38, ¶ 10.) As indicated, due process
requires only informal, non-adversarial, periodic reviews of status. The decisions made thereafter
not to return Riker to the general population are fully justified based on his actions damaging
property damage and his threats to staff and other inmates while in administrative segregation. (See
Docket No. 36, ¶ 23.) Continued placement in administrative segregation was warranted for the
same reasons he was initially placed there—safety risks to the prison community.
It is not difficult to see that Riker posed a threat to the general population, and his conduct
warranted his stricter limiting conditions within administrative segregation. These stricter
conditions were not punishment or retribution, but necessary measures to ensure the safety of the
staff and other inmates. Riker was able to destroy property and even escape from his cell and belly
chain, so the heightened conditions were necessary to make sure that Riker was physically unable to
continue the property damage and potentially carry out one of his many threats to staff and other
inmates. The restraint measures may have been a hardship for Riker, but they were necessary.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Due
to the necessity and purpose of the stricter confinement, and the periodic reviews throughout his
segregations status, the court finds no violation of due process in Riker’s continued segregation
status.
The defendants have presented the measures taken to restrain Riker, but Riker claims that
the multiple incident reports and continued misconduct warranting the restrictions are “lies and half
truths.” (Docket No. 41.) Although he makes this conclusory assertion, he has not presented
anything specific to place these facts in dispute. The court concludes that the conditions imposed on
the plaintiff were not punishment and did not violate due process.
B. Plaintiff’s Cruel and Unusual Punishment Claim
The court now looks to whether or not the conditions of the Riker’s confinement in
administrative segregation amounted to cruel and unusual punishment. Riker claims that the
conditions of his confinement, most notably his restriction on recreation and yard time, subjected
him to cruel and unusual punishment as prohibited by the Eighth Amendment. As noted above,
because Riker was a pretrial detainee, his claim is to be analyzed under the Fourteenth Amendment.
The mere fact that pretrial detention interferes with a person’s desire to live comfortably and
free from restraint does not by itself make the conditions unconstitutional. Board v. Farnham, 394
F.3d 469, 477 (7th Cir. 2005). In order to be cruel and unusual, there must be a denial of “basic
11
human needs” or the “minimum measure of life’s necessity” Rhoades v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337,
347 (1981). Claims of cruel and unusual punishment require the plaintiff to show he has suffered an
objectively, sufficiently serious injury, and that prison staff inflicted the injury with deliberate
indifference. Framer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 834 (1994). The standard for deliberate indifference
is that the defendant committed an act so dangerous that his knowledge of the risk can be inferred or
that the defendant knew of an impending harm. Antonelli, 81 F.3d at 1427 (citing Miller v.
Neathery, 52 F.3d 634, 638 (7th Cir. 1995)). In terms of length of confinement with recreation
restrictions, more than 90 days of confinement without yard time is considered cruel and unusual,

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
but preventing access to the yard to protect prison staff from violent behavior is reasonable,
regardless of the time. Pearson v. Ramos, 237 F.3d 881, 885 (7th Cir. 2001). “To confine in
‘solitary’ a prisoner who behaves like a wild beast whenever he is let out of his cell is the least cruel
measure . . . for dealing with such a person.” Id.
In the case at hand, Riker was not completely deprived of his time out of his cell. At the
onset of administrative segregation, Riker was allowed his mandatory one hour per day recreation
time. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 5.) This privilege was slowly taken away because of Riker’s violent acts,
threats, and property damage any time he was let out of his cell. Although his recreation time was
diminished, it was never completely taken away. At the end of his stay in Racine County Jail, Riker
was still allowed out of his modified cell three days a week, Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays.
(Docket No. 36, ¶ 21.) He was to be in belly chain and leg irons while out of the dayroom. (Docket
No. 36, ¶ 17.) These conditions of confinement are fully compliant with the enunciated standards as
to what is, and is not, cruel and unusual. Riker was not denied any basic human need, as he was still
allowed out of his cell to shower and use the phone, and he makes no claims of lack of food, water,
or other basic necessity.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Riker claims severe mental and physical injuries, but shows no evidence as to the existence
or severity of these alleged injuries. Injured or not, the jail staff did not act with deliberate
indifference to his conditions of confinement, but acted out of necessity and concerns for safety.
The planning and the diligence of the staff demonstrate that concerns for safety were taken into
account, not just for Riker, but everyone. The intent of the staff was never to harm Riker and the
actions taken were in accordance with legitimate penalogical policies. The irons and chains and
limited recreation time were conditions necessitated by Riker’s violent behavior and threats; they
were not imposed for the purpose of punishment.
The fact that Riker was uncomfortable and his living situation was not free from restraint
does not make the confinement conditions unconstitutional. The court finds that the staff acted for a
legitimate governmental purpose; the conditions were necessary to restrain the uncontrollable Riker,
and the conditions were not so severe as to constitute cruel and unusual punishment under the
Fourteenth Amendment.
V. CONCLUSION
The jail staff did not violate Riker’s liberty interest when they placed Riker in
administrative segregation, as his status and placement followed the procedures in the jail. Because
his placement was for a legitimate governmental goal, one which outweighed any liberty interest,
there was no due process violation. Neither were Riker’s continued placement and limiting
conditions a violation of due process because Riker was treated in accordance with an appropriate
review procedure. His continued administrative status was warranted due to his behavior and the

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
need to keep him segregated from the general population. Nor was Riker’s confinement cruel and
unusual. He was not deprived of any basic human need. The staff imposed very limiting conditions,
but these were done out of necessity due to Riker’s uncontrollable destructive and threatening
behavior. For these reasons, the court concludes that there was no violation of due process and
13
further concludes that the conditions of confinement did not constitute cruel and unusual
punishment.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the defendant’s motion for summary judgment,
(Docket No. 35), is granted. The clerk shall enter judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s complaint and
this action.
Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin this 13th day of July, 2012.
______________________
AARON E. GOODSTEIN
U.S. Magistrate Judge

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Sean says above in his blog “Wisconsin Inmates are an Enigma to me” that he bombed a few places because of their ties to people in that area who were having sex with children. But in this piece from The Salt Lake Tribune it seems very different.
“I was totally out of control due to drugs,” Riker told Benson on Monday. …..”At the time I was heavily on methamphetamines.” The bombs exploded at Star Flag and Display on July 31, 1995; at Dixie Auto Sales on Aug .4, 1995; at Woodward Elementary School on Aug. 5, 1995; and at Agave bookstore on Sept. 23, 1995. Two bombs were set off at the school. (WAY TO PROTECT THOSE CHILDREN SEAN) The bookstore, badly damaged and no longer in business, was bombed to disguise a burglary, Riker admitted.
(ADMITTED! YOU ADMITTED IT WAS TO DISGUISE A BURGLARY. NOWHERE IN HERE DOES IT SAY YOU BOMBED THESE PLACES BECAUSE THEY WERE TIED INTO SOME CHILD SEX SCANDAL. YOU FUCKING LIAR AND PIECE OF SHIT SEAN RIKER. LIAR LIAR PANTS ON FIRE!!!) – All pun intended since you really did blow your own dumb ass up and claim you thought you were on fire. Sean says he was heavily on drugs, stupidity was the reason he committed the crimes and he was covering up a burglary. So make up your mind Sean and quit telling people you bombed places because of Mormons having sex with children.
Full story available here http://www.sltrib.com/ci_13763369

sweetpea00 Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
There is so much I want to say here but I will keep this short and sweet. I am so sorry for being so stupid and blind! I can't believe that I actually thought he could be innocent. Please understand that when I seen the copy of the CPS report I realy thought that everything he was telling me was true. I just hope the children will be ok from now on. Thank you for posting all of this on here. Also, Mark Jordan is at Big Sandy in Inex, KY now right?? Well guess what? So is my new sweetie. He might even know him. I even talked to my sweetie about Sean and this whole case and he doesn't know any of you guys and isn't even able to read all this stuff about Sean but even he tried to tell me that there is no way Sean is innocent. There is no way they would hold a man on a milion dollar bond unless they really did have some real evidence that he did what he did. But I was stubborn and stupid and wanted to believe he was innocent. I honestly don't know how Angel died. her mother called me and told me what killed her and she didn't say it was suicide. I talked to Angel many times before this happened. I even asked Mr. Hart and his son both if they thought Sean was innocent. They told me they didn't even know anymore. This stuff is just VERY crazy and yet also VERY VERY sad. I am ashamed of the things I said and the way I acted towards you. When I called you a bitch and said you lied I thought for sure you called me a bitch first and I reacted to it. I understand about respecting your guys privacy BUT you already lost that when you talked to the media about all this. Otherwise none of us would of never known about any of this. But you did talk to the news and the media and then ofcourse Sean posted al kinds of stuff as well so it's no longer private. Know what I mean? Anyhow, I hope you & your children will forgive me for being so dumb! I am not kissing ass. I really mean it. I wish you & your children well. I will not be back on here anymore. Take care, Sweetpea

Karma Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Just thought I would mention, at the time inmate was murdered, you Mr Riker were pretty much a white supremacist and your 2 star witnesses were black men. Come on like you really would have hung out in the prison yard with 2 black men for the purpose other than to frame an innocent man for that murder. And to top it off 1 if those key witnesses were not even in the yard when the murder occurred. Records show that at the time one if the witnesses had worked in the kitchen so there could of been no way to witness the murder. After all the facts I cannot believe an innocent man is doing your time. I went to this trial and it was the saddest form of injustice I seen in many, many, years. If the man who got convicted for mr rulers crime was only allowed to bring his proof to the jury. The judge denied 90% of evidence that would if proved him innocent . Was told it would confuse the jury.. I hope one day Mr Jordan gets exonerated and the truth comes out. Mr Riker you are a real piece of work,

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Over on Nathan’s other page called “Moderating the Sean Riker debate” our great neutral moderator asks me to stop posting inflammatory bullshit. Oh really? Inflammatory bullshit like what Megan posted above – which does nothing more than cuss me out and show what a delusion circus she lives in. Her post here and the ones I will copy/paste below offer no evidentiary value and nothing of substance. She calls me a cunt and a bitch a few times, says I’m a liar, says I’m going to prison and Sean’s getting out. Then she borderline illiterately rambles on about the inhumane living conditions Sean experiences in jail and prison. Learn to spell Megan. Learn to use proper sentences. Learn to make arguments without relying only on calling other people bitches to make your point. Sean getting out soon? I don’t think so since the court of appeals just reaffirmed his 7 ½ year conviction in the jail damage case. I’ll be posting the court of appeals affirmation of the 7 ½ sentence. I’ll also be posting the inflammatory bullshit that Megan has posted. Megan, are you Puerto Rican? I told you before that Sean is racist. But apparently you don’t believe me. That’s okay it’s not like there’s a lot of support of Sean being racist. Oh wait, there IS a lot of evidence of Sean being racist. Besides such silly things as Sean writing “Nordic” on this jail cell there is some real proof of it. By the way Sean, you’re not Nordic, not Scandinavian at all you moron. You’re German. Get real. And you have a swastika tattooed on your left arm and a 666 tattoo above it. Who tattoos swastikas on their arm and 666 tattoos? People like you do Sean, people who worship the devil and have no remorse and no ability to understand the pain of others. So I get accused of posting inflammatory bullshit but not Megan. I post links, court documents, and contradictions from Sean himself. It’s cool though. No evidence is enough for those who don’t believe and none is necessary for those who do. But don’t insult me, I run circles around Megan and her ilk. She is unintelligent, functionally illiterate and crass. And she’s not even white, which is such a hoot considering how much Sean hates non-whites.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Speaking of the article about the court of appeals affirming Sean’s 7 ½ sentence why did Sean write on his PrisonInmates.com personal site that he’s getting out. Here’s a directly quoted bit of fun from that:
“Great News!!! I’ve been serving a 200 years for crimes I’m 100% innocent of. I was prosecuted, persecuted and vilifies for the worst crimes imaginable. (spelling errors consistent with the page, not mine) Though newly obtained DNA evidence that proves my innocence and the recantation of the star “witness” I will be set free. I have no idea how long until I get out. The filling of the motions and the waiting period in the courts could take a while. BUT I’m GETTING OUT!!! My legal team has already been contacts regarding a settlement for my wrongful conviction. I will be on easy street at the end of this order. I’m so excited I could explode.”
Here’s the article from The Racine Journal Times:
Appeals court affirms conviction in jail damage spree October 20, 2012
RACINE- A state appellate court decision this week upheld an almost 2-year-old Racine County conviction against a man for damaging the Racine County Jail when he broke out of his cell and went on a rampage.
The three-judge panel issued its decision on Wednesday, affirming former Wind Lake resident Sean A. Riker’s November 2010 conviction for busting up the jail. He broke out of his cell in a 24-hour lockdown segregation unit on Jan. 6, 2010 by repeatedly pounding on the door until it became dislodged.
According to an appellate court filling, Riker contended that an inmate threw fermented feces mingled with urine at the base of his cell door that morning. He said the mixture splashed him in the face and mouth and argued he had to break out of his cell because he didn’t have access to towels, water or a shower. (SPLASHED YOU IN THE MOUTH, WERE YOU GIVING THE BOTTOM OF THE DOOR A KISS WHEN THE ALLEGED FECES CAME AT THE DOOR. THIS IS THE MOST RIDICULOUS CRAP EVER, PARDON THE PUN. YOU MUST LIKE FECES SEAN SINCE FECES WAS THE OBJECT OF CHOICE YOU ACCUSED ME OF SMEARING OVER FAMILY PHOTOS.)

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
“We conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit for appearl,” the judges wrote in the eight-page opinion.
The opinion, obtained Friday afternoon by The Journal Times, says that Riker’s account couldn’t be confirmed by his attorney or the appellate court. (SO WEIRD HOW LIKE NOTHING SEAN SAYS CAN BE CONFIRMED)
“Appellate counsel indicates that she investigated the matter and found nothing to corroborate Riker’s claim of a biohazard attack” that day, the judges wrote.
Riker – an alleged member of the Aryan Brotherhood – contended that because of his opinion about minorities, he was the target of “rampant and ongoing” abuse from other inmates. (WHAT OPINIONS ABOUT MINORITIES COULD THAT BE SEAN. POSITIVE OPINIONS OF MINORITIES? NAH, IT’S NEGATIVE OPINIONS OF MINORITIES WHICH MAKES YOU AN ADMITTED RACIST)
Riker remains in the Wisconsin Secure Program Facility in Boscobel. He sought late last year to have his conviction in this case overturned.
Appellate court records show the judges also decided Riker’s defense attorney, Urszula Tempska, no long has to represent him. (GUESS SHE’S NOT ON YOUR LEGAL TEAM, LOL)
Riker was sentenced Dec. 22, 2010, by Racine County Circuit Judge Wayne Marik to 7 ½ years in prison and five years on extended supervision for damaging the jail. Marik also ordered Riker, 44, to repay $5,443.79 in damages.
Marik convicted Riker on Nov. 4, 2010 , of two felony and two misdemeanor charges: criminal damage to property and escape, and criminal damage to property and disorderly conduct, respectively.
But Riker won’t be released from the stat’s Maximum security prison when that term ends. In a separate case, Riker was sentenced on March 2 of this year to 200 years behind bars for beating his wife and two stepdaughters, molesting the girls and terrorizing this family in their Wind Lake home.
Jurors convicted Riker on Nov. 11, 2011, of the 16 charges. The family moved to their Wind Lake rental home after Riker was released from federal prison, where he served time for a series of bombing in 1995 in Utah.
Article available here http://www.journaltimes.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/appeals-court-affirms-conviction-in-jail-damage-spree/article_f3d121d6-1a44-11e2-b004-001a4bcf887a.html

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Here I will provide evidence of Sean being racist.
“According to the criminal complaint, Riker slipped out of his belly chain as he was being moved from his cell to the shower area of the jail on July 29. The 2-foot long section of chain had a padlock on it, and was still attached to handcuffs on his wrists.”
“Staff at the jail said Riker screamed about his treatment in the jail and used racial slurs while telling staff to stop putting black men in cells near him. He allegedly swung the chain, cracking a day room window. After re reportedly agreed to return to his cell, staff said Riker turned and ran to the corner cell in front of a day room occupied by two black inmates. He then allegedly swung the chain and padlock at the window several times, causing it to crack.”
“Staff said Riker then quickly returned to his cell and said “There. Now they can’t come out ‘cause their window’s broken.” “ Above three paragraphs available here http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/wisconsin/wiedce/2:2010cv00906/54450/46/?1342279871
RACINE- The man who allegedly broke out of his jail cell and trashed a day room has pleaded not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect.”
SO SEAN IS ADMITTING HE HAS A MENTAL DISEASE OR DEFECT. “Defense attorney Robert Peterson told the court Friday that his client had been on psychotropic drugs before his arrest, and that the jail did not keep giving him the medication. The judge asked if Riker intended to enter the same type of plea in his other case – for the alleged abuse of his family; Peterson said he did not believe so.”
The same Peterson attorney that you didn’t like for whatever reason and then made up the claim that he sexually molested you so that you could have him removed from your case. You asked for him to be removed, the judge refused, and then you said he sexually molested you so you’d get your way and he’d be off the case. And Sean’s admitting that he has a mental disease or defect here in this case. That was his official plea. No making stuff up or inflammatory bullshit from me. Sean pled that himself. So does Sean have a mental disease or defect or is he manipulating the system and crying wolf. But he says he was on psychotropic drugs. Guess what? They don’t give psychotropic drugs to mentally stable people. I have never been on meds once in my life for any mental illness. And after taking a mental health evaluation it was determined that I was mentally healthy and not asked to take any therapy or get on any meds. My brain works Sean. Yours apparently doesn’t. So quit saying someone who has been professionally deemed mentally stable is not at the same time you’re claiming you’re innocent by reason of mental disease or defect because you weren’t being administered your psychotropic drugs.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Sweetpea: I have been called names, told I’m sadistic, a liar, a bad mother, had women want to get their hands on me and make threats against me. All women I don’t know. All women who have hate for me based on the bullshit Sean feeds them. Women have written to child services in my county offering to take my children from me when I go to prison because Sean has convinced them I am going to prison. This has become such an issue with the possibility of these crazy women trying to kidnap my children that I moved on the county’s dime to get out of this area so that I am safe and my kids are safe. And it burns Sean up so much. Trying to force me to give out my new address and trying to take me to court to demand it or have me sanctioned. Sean got kicked off the case here because he lies, twists things around and is a malicious jerk in all aspects of anything he is involved in. So all these things Sean says about me are untrue but I don’t threaten to kill judges or prosecutors, I don’t damage state property, I don’t make racial insults towards other people and I don’t have to be wheeled into court like Hannibal Lector. I know this stuff about me isn’t true but I go to work, take care of my kids, go to court and do all the other things in a normal life plus deal with the misery of the whole “Sean situation” without doing any of those things. Are you really giving Sean a pass on threatening to kill a judge and acting how he did in jail because he says he was wrongfully accused? So it’s okay for me to threaten people, beat people up, damage property and threaten judges and it’s all okay because Sean says things about me that aren’t true. And Sean’s past can’t be used against him because it has nothing to do with our case. Yes, it does. Sean admits in his own words he was in youth authority since age 13. Before 2006 he had never been out of prison for more than four years by his own account. And during those four years he was committing felonies. Back in prison in 1995 for another decade and released again in 2006. During the 06-09 years he was committing felonies as well. There’s no period of Sean being good to try to counter this. His whole life has been in prison or on the streets for a stretch while he committed more crimes. Your uncle was violent but not towards women and children. Good for him. But he’s not Sean. They are different men. Some similarities, some differences. I also believe that some men can be violent and dangerous and yet not hurt their family. Even though my own experience should tell me otherwise I still choose to believe that. But Sean isn’t one of those men. He does hurt women. He beat Paula, the woman who did the bombing with him. He beat me and beat my kids. Sean has no time in his life that he was around kids. His kids were in diapers when he and Paula were in a meth-induced bombing spree in Utah. Those kids never saw Sean for 15 years. No contact through the mail.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Their mother, Christina, never took the kids to visit Sean while he was incarcerated. And she didn’t give him the letters he wrote. And she did the right thing. It was better to move away from Sean and let the boys have a normal childhood. But why, if Sean was so great then as you claim he is now, did Christina leave him. Why would she leave that marital bliss and for such The other daughter you claim is his probably isn’t. Sean said this girl had a bad mother who was addicted to drugs and she had no good family. She wanted a father so much so she reached out to Sean for what was missing in her life. Once Sean got out of federal prison he wanted nothing to do with her. He said she was mentally unstable. (Who knows if that’s true or not) He slept with her mother a few times. I doubt he is biologically her father. And he certainly isn’t a father role for her. He was locked up during her entire childhood and teen years and he never once visited her after being released in 2006. Not once. Sean has had no time to be around children during his life to show one way or another on how he acts around kids. And I made the mistake of my and my children’s life by giving him a chance. He destroyed my children and treated us as if we were in prison with him and he gave us the “no mercy” policy he mentions above in his “Wisconsin Inmates are an Enigma to Me” post. Do you think it’s reasonable for me to post pictures of my minor children with abuse on them on the internet to fill your obsessive and somewhat weird sense of need? Do you think that is appropriate? You do realize that the jurors saw this evidence don’t you? There was five days of trial testimony, five days. I testified for two hours. The kids testified in addition to the videos and other misc. things for one day. That leaves 3 ½ days of testimony that was not related to me “lying” on the stand or the kids.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
And now I’ve got Nathan Lindell, a convicted murderer of his elderly coin-collecting neighbor, arsonist and thief calling me a liar because he’s studied “kinetics” while in prison and based on that expert knowledge of his he believes Sean’s body language is telling the truth. How fucking ridiculous. A convicted murderer accusing me of lying about my own marriage. Nathan and Sean can’t even get it straight if Sean has a tv in his cell or not. Nathan claims Sean’s too poor for a tv, yet Sean claims he watches tv, works out and corresponds with hundreds of followers during the day. Only people like you sweetpea and people like Megan who can’t spell or write worth a shit believe this stuff. Sean and Nathan prey on women like you two. Women who are bored and lonely, maybe not fulfilled in their own life, think they are doing some great detective work and making a difference in all the injustice of the world. You care so much about my kids. Please don’t, they’re fine. Care about the kids that still live with people like Sean Riker. Or the kids whose parents couldn’t afford Christmas presents because Sean Riker stole their father’s Christmas bonus check from his job. Or the kids in Mark Jordan’s life that lost a family member because Sean pinned Mark for a murder Sean did himself. Are you as worried about Angel’s son who now has no mother at all because of her relationship and interaction with Sean? That poor boy lost a mother to suicide. My kids have a strong mother, a mother that is still alive. A mother that doesn’t allow delusions to control her life and spend more time worrying about a man in prison than her own child. Yes sweetpea, my children are just fine.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
[deleted]

admin Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 6 months ago   Favorite
The preceding comment was removed for violation of our community guidelines: http://betweenthebars.org/about/guidelines/. Repeated violations of our community guidelines are grounds for removal from the site. For more information about why this comment was removed please contact us info@betweenthebars.org.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Sean said on Nathan’s blog titled “Moderating the Sean Riker debate” that “I’m Sean Riker and everything I say is true”
But it just isn’t true Sean. I have proved over and over again that you’re a liar.
You claim to be a good guy vs. the court paperwork that says you’re a federal prison snitch who was in protective custody because you were worried for your own safety. You checked in Sean and we all know it.
You say you’re not racist but the paperwork I posted shows you asked for “any nigger to kill” as well as demanding jail staff not house black men near your cells and calling a Hispanic jail guard a “spic”.
You claim you’re getting out on your prisoninmates.com site vs. me showing that clearly you’re not thanks to the appellate court upholding the 7 ½ years.
You said you got a letter from your child vs. nobody actually get a letter and me talking to four of the agencies you said you sent the letter to and the Attorney General’s own letter back to you mentioning only YOUR letter.
You claiming I’m going to prison vs. Well, I haven’t yet so that is rather obvious.
Saying I’m unstable vs. your fiancé killing herself over you and you being on psychotropic drugs.
You claiming DNA evidence will exonerate you vs. you saying everywhere else that only my lies convicted you. And then Nathan saying the DNA mixup was just a white lie at most.
Your desperate housewives and Nathan can go around on the merry-go-round of excuses and lies all they want.
You went to federal prison for burglaries, arson and bombings. Including an elementary school. And you lied about the motive because it was to cover up a robbery from your meth-induced crime spree. Not because of Mormons having sex with kids. But they excuse that.
You were in a prison gang and involved in a murder where a man has spent almost 15 years now proclaiming his own innocence. But Mark Jordan is also just a liar and this is all excused too.
You committed crimes during the entire time you lived in Utah. Excused.
You admit you were never out of trouble or prison for more than four years from the age of 13 until now. No biggie, it’s excused too.
You have a swastika tattoo and you refer to black people almost solely as niggers. You ask to kill them and tell guards they are spics and you will remember their face and get them when they are not around five other guards. But you say you’re not a racist. We believe you, excused.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
You’re a nice guy Sean. You’re not racist, you don’t hurt people. You don’t commit property crimes and crimes against persons. You love children and your own previous record of being an involved father to your own children is solid. You treat women with respect. The whole “no mercy” policy was just a joke. You treated people in prison with respect and you never checked in or snitched to get freedom. You don’t lie about anything at all. It’s ok to have women write hate mail to your ex-wife and write lies about her to judges, social services and online. It’s okay that a woman killed herself for you and left with son with no mother. But you’re getting out soon! So soon you think you might explode, and you’re looking for love again. No matter that every woman who has had experience with you was ruined. Christina raised her boys on her own, no help from you. Paula spent 3 years in prison for being with you during the bombings and certainly she wasn’t the mastermind. Your ex-wife suffered years of abuse to her and her children. Angel killed herself. You are a caner on society Sean Riker. A cancer with no cure. I feel sorry for the taxpayers of Wisconsin for having to pay the bill to house and feed you.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Sweetpea: Does your husband know that you’re obsessed with another man? That you write letters to him, call and talk to his lawyer and look up information for him. That you watch family videos from him. This is emotional cheating. Take the time and energy you give Sean and give it your husband. Is your husband ok with his wife being obsessed with someone else’s business? Sean would never be that type of husband, to let his wife write another man and watch his movies. Your husband either doesn’t know what you’re doing or you married a pushover. The type of man who if he ever ended up in prison himself would be raped in his ass by exactly the type of inmate Sean says he is. Does that make you feel good? Are you a self-proclaimed journalist or private investigator? Do you have any ethics? Have you taken a college level ethics course? It is clear by the way you write, the things you write and your comprehension abilities that you have no formal law education. And thanks for mentioning what Hart told you. I will be filing a formal complaint with the WI state board of attorney ethics on him. And if you tell me the name of the guard you spoke to I will be filing a formal complaints against him as well. You asked why Sean didn’t testify on his own behalf. Well, let me give you a bit of information that someone who actually does know what they’re talking about would have already known:
Simple answer – Sean’s a coward.
Longer answer – If Sean had taken the stand it would have allowed the D.A. to ask Sean if he was a felon. Sean would have to answer yes to this question. Then the D.A. could answer what felonies have you been convicted of. And Sean would have to answer that he was convicted of felonies that include arson, bombing an elementary school and three other buildings among others. This would have looked very bad for Sean. If Sean took the stand his entire past criminal and prison history would have been fair game. By not taking the stand it was never brought up. That’s right. The jury did not know that Sean had served federal prison time for any reason let alone for bombing a school. They didn’t know of his prison career from age 13 onward in max and supermax facilities in California and the federal system. They got no info that he is the most likely suspect in a murder that was committed in prison. They knew nothing of his past. And yet they still convicted him on all 16 state charges. It also allowed Sean to skate around all of the felonies he committed during our time in Utah. The abuse in Utah, the things he stole ect. All of Utah has basically off limits because Sean didn’t take the stand and because I did Sean the favor of not bringing up Utah. I stayed focused on only what happened in Wisconsin. If Utah had been brought up five days of trail would not have been enough.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Mark Jordan Is Innocent

Submitted by lala (not verified) on September 30, 2010 - 3:35pm.


Thanks to everyone for their positive comments and support. And a special thanks to those who made it to the oral argument. Unfortunately, the Federal Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of my motion to permit DNA testing of the murder weapon under the Innocence Protection Act. LINK?. The court reasoned that even if someone else's DNA is foundon the wapon, such as the DNA of Sean Riker, that would prove only that Riker handled the weapon at some time (Riker actually denies ever handling the weapon), and will not prove that I am innocent. The court basically interpreted the Innocence Protection Act very narroly to permit DNA testing only where the results will prove conslsively exonerating. A copy of all proceedings in this case under the IPA, including the appeal court's February 11, 2010 order, can be found on jordanlitigation.com on the "Criminal Litigation" page, under "Pending Innocence Protection Action Proceedings". LINK?
I also want to separately address the sorely misinformend June 16, 2010 comments posted my "Hmmm". First, as to what is or is not "ON FILM", the video evidence used at trial is now availabe to the public at jordanlitigation.com, on the "Criminal Litigation" page, under "Section II. Trial and Sentencing In District Court". We hope to also have the entire trial transcrips posted very soon.
While it is not at all clear from that video, I did manage to get ahold of the murder weapon immediately after BOP/FBI confidential informant Sean Riker stabbed the victim, my former cellmate and friend. I did then run behind the victim - between him and his assailant - after he was stabbed by Riker. Although not on video, which mysterioulsy skips over this activity, I did throw the murder weapon on a rooftop and run to a Bureau of Prison' Lieutenant to assist the victim, Davin Brian Stone, who died later that day. Further contrary to the commenter's misstatements, the actual assailant, Sean Riker, was not "seen leaving the scene long before the stabbing happened". Indeed, the video places him with the victim minutes prior to his assault and the government's own star witness, Gary Collins, a fellow gang associate of Riker, testified to Riker's presence at the time of the stabbing.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
I cannot fathom how this commenter could have gotten so wrong such demonstrative facts concerning what the video evidence does/doesn't depict, or why the commenter would incorporate such factual misstatement to tarnish my case for justice. Please review the video. LINK? Which should be available any day now @ jordanlitigation.com
I encourage that commenter to also review my proposed trial testimony at pages 105-112 of "Jordan's Amended Motion to Vacate" ?, which is pending before the court and available at jordanlitigation.com, on the "Criminal Litigation" page, under "Section VI. Pending Motion To Vacate Conviction". All of the evidence, save the perjured testimony of two jailhouse rats, one of whom has since recanted, is entirely consistent with my proposed trial testimony, my not assaulting anyone.
Finally, I remind that commenter that Federal Judge Lewis Babcock refused to allow my defense to call Sean Riker to the stand in my defense, as a witness, to ask him whether and why he in fact stabbed the victim. The basis for Judge Babcock's refusal was that my doing so "would confuse the jury".
It is clear to me that justice in my case will not be administered by the courts or by way of my release. I expect only that my innocence, my wrongful conviction, my be proven publicly and that the public will administer justice in grater awareness, progressive changes in the criminal justice system, and the prevention of further wrongful convictions. It may be too late for me, but it is not too late for change. There, will I find my justice.

MJordan@jordancenter.org

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Mark Jordan's right for a new trial-Dna testing

Submitted by Anonymous on December 6, 2009 - 8:55pm.


The more i hear about this Sean Riker, The more i believe in Mr Jordan's innocence.A man that can put a shotgun to his own baby's head and beat his wife and children is a man that is capable of murder and this case should be reviewed and witnesses should be questioned again because it doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out there are many people caught up in lies just to pin this on jordan.I truly believe Mark Jordan is innocent and wish him the best and hope one day soon he will be cleared of this and move on with his life,enjoy the time with his family.If he has children im sure he will be a great father to them and be greatful that god gave him a chance to be with them. Not put a shotgun to their head!!! Stay Strong!!

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Mark Jordan New Trial

Submitted by Anonymous on November 21, 2009 - 3:37pm.


There is no doubt in my mind that Mr. Jordan is innocent. I was reading his website jordanlitigation.com and learned alot of details that i never knew before.How this jury found him guilty still blows my mind.I think the workers from the bop know much more about that day then they are saying, also it seems to amaze me how cameras in the most secure prison in the country just so happen to change views while the stabbing took place.Give me a break!! Probly a set up of some sort.It also says bloody glove was found near a set of bleachers where "it has been proven Mark Jordan was no where near".There are just way to many facts that prove him innocent and i believe the truth will be told one day.But until that day Mr Jordan should be a free man.Whats there to hide?Give him the DNA test requested.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Mark Jordan's right for a new trial

Submitted by Anonymous on November 3, 2009 - 12:04pm.


Hi I am a long time friend of Mark and just wanted to say this man was once a boy who was and i believe still is a wonderful, loving person. Did he commit robbery at 17? Yes. But he has also served 15 years in prison which is not usual considering his age and the fact no one was hurt. I am in my 70's and hope to see mark with his family once again and hope and pray he gets a new trial to prove his innocence.I am tired of hearing so much negative when there are so many positive things about mark. I remember when mark was younger he would walk around for hours collecting food for homeless people or families who wouldnt have a meal on holidays,and then surprise these families for the holidays.He would shovel snow for hours free of charge so that seniors around the neighborhood wouldn't have to go outside and do it. I just needed to let people know this man is not the monster some make him out to be and in my opinion " innocent ".

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Bomb-spree accomplice gets 3 years in prison

By Robert Gehrke, Associated Press writer

Published: Wednesday, Oct. 8 1997 12:00 a.m. MDT

A federal judge has sentenced Paula Castillo Rogers to three years in prison for her role in a bombing and robbery spree in St. George two years ago.

"You terrorized the city of St. George," U.S. District Judge Dee Benson told Rogers on Tuesday.Rogers, 31, had pleaded guilty to one count of malicious destruction of a building and admitted to being an accomplice of Sean Riker. Riker has pleaded guilty to detonating five bombs in St. George businesses and the two have admitted to a string of robberies.

Her attorney, Greg Stevens, asked Benson for leniency, claiming that Rogers played a minor role in the crime spree and was coerced into participating through beatings she received from Riker.

"I was involved in a lot of that but I was scared of him," Rogers said. "He did beat me up a lot and put me in the hospital. . . . He threatened my kids if I didn't stay."

Stevens also said Rogers was enrolled in Narcotics Anonymous to try to kick a drug habit.

Benson was dubious of her explanation. He ran down a list of 14 robberies of southern Utah businesses and residences in which she and Riker are suspects, asking if she played a part in each. She admitted involvement in six.

The state has agreed not to prosecute Rogers in those robberies.

Benson said that the fact she chose not to take part in eight alleged robberies indicates that Riker did not exercise excessive control and chastised her for offering "some 1990s excuse that you were being bullied and coerced by your boyfriend."

"I find quite to the contrary," Benson said. "You were in this up to your eyeballs."

Benson sentenced Rogers to 36 months in prison and an additional three years on supervised release. She also must participate in a psychiatric-health program and a drug and alcohol testing program and pay $59,452 restitution.

"I think (36) months is light, and it's a good thing you didn't get caught and prosecuted on the others, or you could be spending the rest of your life in prison," Benson said.

Since her arrest, Rogers has spent the 21 months in Salt Lake County Jail. She will be in a federal prison for the duration of her sentence, said Stevens.

Riker has pleaded guilty to five counts of use of an explosive device. Prosecutors plan to seek a prison sentence of more than 11 years at his Oct. 27 sentencing.

Riker admitted to detonating bombs at Star Flag and Display on July 31, 1995; at Dixie Auto Sales on Aug. 4, 1995; at Woodward Elementary School on Aug. 5, 1995; and at Agave bookstore on Sept. 23, 1995. Two bombs were set off at the school.

Rogers admitted to acting as a lookout and buying supplies for Riker in at least four bombings.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Her attorney, Greg Stevens, asked Benson for leniency, claiming that Rogers played a minor role in the crime spree and was coerced into participating through beatings she received from Riker.

"I was involved in a lot of that but I was scared of him," Rogers said. "He did beat me up a lot and put me in the hospital. . . . He threatened my kids if I didn't stay."

This is from Sean's ex-girlfriend Paula. By Sean's own words he was never out of prison for longer than the timeframe that he was during the mid 1990's and he spent this time with Paula. This time was plauged with meth and drug use that Sean admits himself and claims he was out of control from.
And now the woman he was with during that time is claiming that Sean threatened her kids and beat her often including putting her in the hospital. Sean told me himself that he beat Paula almost dead one time and beat her often other than that. Add Paula and her children to the list of people who are victims of Sean.

Paula - If you ever come accross this stupid blog and read this garbage about Sean being innocent and a nice guy let me tell you this. I am sorry that I have used your name to further my own points. I am sorry for taking any privacy away from you by doing so.
I am also sorry that you knew Sean. I do believe you that you were scared. I was scared too. I believe that Sean used your children as a pawn to make you do things for him. I stayed for so long because I had kids and I was scared too. I believe you that he beat you and I am sorry for all of it. I am sorry that Judge Benson didn't believe you about the type of abuse that I know you suffered. I am sorry that you lost three years of your life to prison but I am grateful that you were able to escape and free yourself from Sean. Even if that escape could only come through a prison sentence. I hope that you have been able to move away from your time with Sean. I hope your family and you have healed. I hope you found some type of peace. I hope your life has happiness in it. Be proud that you also survived Sean. Others who knew him haven't been so lucky.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Link to article posted above: http://www.deseretnews.com/article/587596/Bomb-spree-accomplice-gets-3-years-in-prison.html

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
[deleted]

admin Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 6 months ago   Favorite
The preceding comment was removed for violation of our community guidelines: http://betweenthebars.org/about/guidelines/. Repeated violations of our community guidelines are grounds for removal from the site. For more information about why this comment was removed please contact us info@betweenthebars.org.

Hazel Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
I have boxes of court documents with facts not hear say. If there's anything you would like to know I'm sure I can pull it up.. After many years of trying to prove Mr. Jordan's innocence I have come across alot of information..

SAH Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
NOW the real sean riker is exposed. exposed from real world women who were with him..who suffered at his hand.

sean riker...you're not going ANYWHERE and the people you screwed in your life are MOVING ON.

unlike you.

cya, loser.

SAH Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
when we get to expose "real life" RONALD E CLARKE...I'll be happy.

I want to expose not the limited uploads he provides for his crime(s), but his actual jacket.

perhaps we'll all view him differently if we knew the extent of his crime(s).

ssweetpea Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
@ whoeveryouwantmetobe,
Wow is that the way you treat people that have apologized to you and admit their wrong! First off I am not married. I never said I was. Go back and read the damn post again. Also, you mentioned my uncle. I never said anything about my uncle. It was my mom's ex husband. You question my education. Do you know how to read?? And yes I can be a bitch right back. Also, I am not obsessed with another man. I met Sean long before I met the man I am with now and my man knows all about Sean, you, your kids, and this case. Just because someone gave Sean a chance to prove his innocence and took interest in this case doesn't mean they are obsessed. Get your facts straight before you start running your mouth! I quit having anything to do with Sean over a year ago. We got into it over this shit with you, Angel, and a few other things. I got tired of it, cut off all communication with Sean, anyone that had anything to do with Sean, and met someone else. I have a great life and am very happy. I also have a great job and a great education! And yes I can prove it and back it up. Just because someone hears about this case and wants to know the truth on everything doesn't make them obsessed. Also, the man I am with is hardly the type to get raped in the ass by another inmate. You don't even know my man. I'll be sure to let him know what you said but he wont waste time on someone as fucked up as you are. I guess Sean was right about you after all. I came back on here to share some important news with you but after seeing the post you made about me you can definately forget it now. You think I am obsessed look who is married again and still searching Sean's name on the internet and posting all kinds of crazy shit. If you hadn't been on Google searching for Sean you would of never known about this website. Maybe you are the one who needs to put all their energy, time, and effort into your own life, new husband, and kids. Maybe you need to go feed them cause I am sure they are hungry as fuck and cold as hell since you seem to leave them on street corners in 20 degree weather with hardly no clothes on. Do I need to post a copy of the CPS report on you or what? You want to be a bitch towards me just remember I can be one just as bad.

ssweetpea Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
@whoeveryouwantmetobe,
And I don't care if you file on Mr. Hart or not. File all the crazy shit you want. By the way, I am sure Mr. Hart is right as well. It's ok though. What comes around goes around. Thanks for showing your true colors on here. If Sean did beat your ass I can definately see why now. Anytime someone tells you they are sorry and wants to right the wrong you still gotta act like a bitch. Why do you spend all your time worrying about the post Sean and Nathan make on here. Seems like you would of learned by now to ignore it and move on with your life. I wonder how your husband feels knowing you can't get past Sean. I do not have time for all this stupid crap with you. If you think Sean can be mean & evil you haven't seen nothing yet. I told you I can be either way depending on how people treat me. You wanna be nice then I'll be nice. You want to be a bitch then so can I and ten times worse! I don't take shit off anyone! Fact! Ask Sean! I feel sorry for those children. They deserve way better!

SAH Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
The only one sobbing about all these row inmates will be Nicki. She is a single mother, a college student (psychology AND Criminology AND she holds a job.

ROFL. I'm hoping the moderators here at BTB are awake.

SAH Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Nicki's own children *beg* for attention while she goes online to satisfy her morbid curiosity.

TAKE CARE OF YOUR YOUNG CHILDREN. GO TO THE PARK, GO TO THE ZOO. MAKE COOKIES.

SAH Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Neglected children are a postule. Ask ANY inmate if their "road to ruin" did not include neglect.

You, Nicki, continue that.

Your children deserve the limited time a single mom (student and employee) can give. That is, of course, if your scenario is true.

:)

Hazel Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
It's funny how your 12 years turned into 10. Do I smell snitch? Possibly a deal with the Feds? May I also say a pair of bloodied gloves were found on the bleachers where it was proven 100% that Mr. Jordan was never near the bleachers back in 99 when this murder happened. At trial the gloves could not be tested because it took the government 10 years to test and the blood could not be identified as human or animal , so the excuse from prosecutors was that it could have been blood from the kitchen.. Please give me a break!!! There is proof that you Mr. Riker were on those bleachers the day this man was murdered.. Also 1 of the key witnesses at trial recanted his false testimony just recently and the government said it won't help Me. Jordan because the witness should have came forward years earlier, I guess his conscience start to bother him, although very upset this innocent man is doing 40 years for you Mr. RIKER I do respect that at least he came forward and is trying to make things right. If you Mr. RIKER only knew how many lives you destroyed... Chain reaction!!

SAH Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
riker is a coward. no other explanation. i've read, digested his cases...smells and looks like a coward. so sorry to the women who were involved in his "game". Looks like his party is up. :)

SAH Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
My biggest problem with SOME (not all...I'll get to those) is that they STILL attempt to guilt and bully from behind the bars.

Case in point: let me digress for a moment.

There is ONE inmate (Marcus T Rogers #377571
SCI
100 Corrections Drive
Stanley, WI 54768)

who caught my attention.

Mr. Rogers admitted and actually apologized/showed remorse for his crime.

He answered every inquiry factually. He was respectful and (to my knowledge), honest.

I give kudos to Mr Rogers and will assist as long as he tells me the truth.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/577090/St-George-bomber-pleads-guilty.html
St. George bomber pleads guilty


Published: Thursday, Aug. 14 1997 12:00 a.m.

Sean Riker has admitted making and detonating five pipe bombs in St. George two years ago.

Riker, 29, pleaded guilty to five counts of use of an explosive device Tuesday before U.S. District Judge Dee Benson.The bombs exploded at Star Flag and Display on July 31, 1995; at Dixie Auto Sales on Aug. 4, 1995; at Woodward Elementary School on Aug. 5, 1995; and at Agave bookstore on Sept. 23, 1995.

Two bombs were set off at the school.

The bookstore, badly damaged and no longer in business, was bombed to disguise a burglary, Riker said.

"At the time I was heavily on methamphetamines . . . . It was just to see how powerful (the pipe bombs) were," he told Benson.

Federal prosecutors will seek a prison sentence of more than 11 years at Riker's Oct. 27 sentencing.

As part of his plea bargain, he must tell state prosecutors about burglaries he committed in St. George.

His former roommate and co-defendant, Paula Castillo Rogers, has pleaded guilty to two charges. Her sentencing is set for Sept. 30.


The bookstore, badly damaged and no longer in business, was bombed to disguise a burglary, Riker said.

"At the time I was heavily on methamphetamines . . . . It was just to see how powerful (the pipe bombs) were," he told Benson.

How does a out-of-business bookstore relate to you bombing places involved in sex crimes against children Sean? And you either are lying to us or you lied to the judge since this article quotes you as saying you bombed those places to cover up burgarlies and just to see how strong the bombs were. You are so lame.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Sweetpea:
I posted everything I did without first reading any new posts. Which means I did not see your apology to me before unleashing my hurt and anger.
You have to understand my position. I suffered at the hands of Sean for four years, and so did my kids. After the horror of my marriage I finally had the courage to leave. Either that or I was finally willing to die trying.
When I left I had no idea that I would be subjected to the hell Sean has inflicted on me. He has sued me in state and federal court more than a dozen times. Brought me back to divorce court countless time. He taunts me. He writes horrible things about me that aren't true on the internet, to the judge in Colorado and other people. He writes horrible things about me to my family, social services ect. It never ends.
This is my life. I can't escape this. I keep getting dragged back in by new lawsuits and new blogs such as this. By being aware of them and fighting them back it gives the power of knowledge. I have to know the enemy to fight it.
I made some rude remarks to you above. I am sorry. I got personal and just mean towards you. I am hurt! I am so hurt from three years of these blogs and people saying what happened to me really didn't happen. It hurts. And because it's my children I don't think I have to put their priavte info on the computer for random women to see. You are like one of 20 women who have contacted me. You have been the only one though that has ever apologized to me.
I accept your apology. And I would like to offer you my own. I am sorry that the rage I feel inside for Sean was unleashed on you. I am sorry I made rude remarks about you. I don't think you're stupid. Maybe too trusting while I am too cynical.
Thank you for believing me,
Tayler Riker

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
I am speaking of Angel's suicide because Sean himself said Angel committied suicide and he said the reason was her pain over his wrongful conviction. It's on this page farther up in a handwritten response from Sean. I will quote it here:
"Also, on Dec 7, 2001 my diance committed suicide after learning of my wrongful conviction."
And for those who still believe Sean you must believe this statement of his also above in handwritten response : "I am Sean Anthony Riker and anything I say is factual and if I can't back it up with proof I will not voice it."
But Nathan says on Moderating the Sean Riker debate that "1) Sean lied in his prisoninmates.com ad - what Sean said about himself is true, except his imminent release + DNA evidence (there were no fluids from which NDA could be extracted from), which express dream. If a lie, a white one."
Nathan, you and Sean need to do a better job at this. Your slip ups are ridiculous. You two can't keep what day it is straight let alone any factual information.

Page labeled #106 as part of the handwritten response from Sean Riker himself:
"In my cell @ 2 a.m. I was watching my favorite move when the cop brought me my mail." - Proof that Sean has a tv in his cell for personal use. Or Sean is lying about having a tv.
Yet in Nathan's blog "Moderating the Sean Riker debate" Nathan Lindell claims that Sean is too poor to own a tv. Quoted "As for your attempt to slur Sean as using anyone for commisary money. That's hilarious. He asks his supporters for books, stamped envelopes, paper and scented oil. The man doesn't even have a personal T.V....."

Yet Nathan also claims he knows Sean well enough that he posted this: "My read on Sean's body language, which I study and have notes from multiple texts on "kinesics" (body language), is he was being truthful when he told me he was innocent...."

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Hello, I'm serving a life sentence for crimes I did not commit.
I am a victim of a grave injustice. I am appealing my conviction and the outcome is favorable but I need your help. I do not seek money. First and foremost I need a friend. I also need someone to set up a website in my name so my evidence of my innocence can be posted to counter all the vicious lies on the web about me.
I'm looking for a fighter, a solid heart that believes there is injustice in the court system. A selfless person that has the gumption and will power to right a wrong. Someone that will stand up for me. Someone who is a gangster at heart. I am desperate for help. or if you are in need of something within my power. I will help you instead. I am intelligent and a great listerner. I have a huge heart filled with compassion for those in need.

I hope you write.
Lastly, I'm straight. I know, gay hearts are breaking all over the world :-) but I don't judge. So feel free to write.

Take care


Nathan - this shows that Sean asks his supporters of more than just stamps and paper to write on. He is actively looking for women to harass me.

SAH Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
That is absolutely SO WRONG. BTB - why are you allowing this?

I often temper my vernacular (no cussing) out of respect. Do we, as victims, need to be victimized OVER AND OVER?

Thank You.

SAH Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
I agree I'm no Nicki. I have no young children at home (as she posts her day). I'm not a student (criminology/psychology), a single mother AND an employee. When my children were born I focused on THEM. Perhaps that is why none of my children were EVER arrested?

SAH Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
NO CRIME was ever visited on my family until the unthinkable. We didn't know. We NEVER knew anyone could be so heinous.

I'm so done with this site..letting these monsters keep spewing their venom about their 3 hots and a cot.

If my grandma was still alive - she'd go right down the row with a brush broom and swipe you all in the head. :)

To all (except Nicki) - I wish you the best. This site will continue to allow these maggots to fester and I don't like maggots.

Every DW is another eradication, IMO.

SAH Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
we used to take care of business with a broom. you "gentlemen" obviously used weapons of force...guns or knives.

HAD you had some good ole mama or gma spankings, maybe you wouldn't be where you are.

Just sayin.....

SAH Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
NOTE TO NICKI:
Read post above.

SAH Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
before the bleeding heart jumps in, let me clarify. i abhor violence. if my kids would not leave the kitchen...i'd get the broom and "sweep" them out. if they acted unruly, I'd get out the broom. Did whatever. I NEVER HURT MY CHILDREN. As a result, i HAD a grandchild who loved and respected (as did her mother).

Thanks, convicts, for taking away MY LIFE. Then bitch about your hots & cots?

I'm outta here.

SAH Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
at one time, 2 of my sons were over 6 ft and maybe 200 plus lbs. i'm 5'1 and 90 lbs. your damned right i used a broom. :) They are LUCKY that's all I used. Young, healthy, LARGE teenage boys are a handle for any mom. There was NO DAD. Just me and my broom. I'll tell u that when they brought friends over, I introduced myself AND my broom. We didn't have any problems. Neither of my children have EVER been arrested. No parking tickets, either (to my knowledge).

Take that, bitches.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Megan de Oliviera posting her vile commentary about me on her site. Wednesday, February 15, 2012




UNJUST JUSTICE



JUSTICE. TOO MANY PEOPLE CLAIMING THEIR INNOCENCE AS THEY DETERIORATE IN A SQUAMISH, SMALL, LIFELESS CELL, REDUCED TO A NUMBER ISSUED BY THE WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. WE APPLAUD OUR CONSTITUTION FOR MULTIFARIOUS REASONS, MAINLY BECAUSE WE ARE APPRECIATIVE OF OUR RIGHTS AS OUTLINED IN THE BILL OF RIGHTS, THEY ARE SUPPOSE TO SHIELD US AGAINST THE DEVIANT MONSTERS THAT ARE GRANTED THE LEGAL AUTHORITY TO CRUCIFY US IF GUILTY OF COMMITTING CRIMES AND TO SHELTER THE INNOCENT FROM BEING A VICTIM OF CRIMES, BUT ARE THEY TRUELY RIGHTS? SHOULD WE EVER CHALLENGE THESE RIGHTS AS WE ARE TARGETED BY A SYSTEM WITH BADGES AND POWER? WHAT IS JUSTICE? AN INNOCENT MAN FACING THE DEATH PENALTY OR LIFE IN PRISON ON A RAPE OR MURDER CHARGE? AN INNOCENT MAN HATED BY THE JUSTICE SYSTEM BECAUSE HE HAD A PREVIOUS ENCOUNTER WITH THE LAW? WE ALL SEARCH FOR ANSWERS AND DEBATE ON HOW WE SHOULD HANDLE CRIMINALS. WE RANT AND ARE BOISTEROUS ABOUT OUR INNER DESIRES TO MAKE THE GUILTY CRIMINALS SUFFER FOR THEIR CRIMES. THERE IS MORE THAN ONE INNOCENT PERSON IN THIS SITUATION, KIDS. ENERGETIC, FLAMBOYANT, MEMORABLE, INNOCENT. SEAN: CHARMING, TALENTED, UNSELFISH, HARDWORKING, AND A DEDICATED, LOVING FATHER. SEAN. LABELED AS A REPEATED CHILD AND WIFE ABUSER. DEGRADING, CRUEL, UNCONTROLLABLE, AND PSYCHOTIC IS WHAT OUR GLORIFIED MEDIA HAS PORTRAYED HIM AS. CRIPPLED AND AT THE MERCY OF OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM IS NOT ONLY HAUNTING, BUT TERRIFYING. OUR CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM CLAIMS THEIR DESIRE TO PROTECT THE INNOCENCE, BUT HOW COME SEAN HAS BEEN REPEATEDLY DESTROYED AND LABELED AS A MONSTER?

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
A MAN, MAKING A MOVE DUE TO A PROMOTION BY HIS WORK, MOVING TO BETTER THE LIFE OF HIS FAMILY, IS QUICKLY DESTROYED BY THE CRAZINESS AND THE UNSTABLE PERSONA DEMONSTRATED BY HIS WIFE, WHO I FUCKEN REFUSE TO PROTECT FOR PRIVACY, TAYLER ANN RIKER OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO. INTIMIDATION, POWER, MONEY, AUTHORITY AND IGNORANCE CIRCULATED THROUGH THE COURT ROOM, AS SEAN, WHO IS INNOCENCE AND HARMLESS, WAS PREVIOUSLY PROVOKED AND AGITATED BY POLICE WAS STRAPPED DOWN IN A RESTRAINT CHAIR, THIS MEANS LIMITED MOVEMENT, PAIN FROM THE STRAPS TIED TOO TIGHT, TREATED LIKE A SERIAL KILLER, FACING A EXPECTED GUILTY VERDICT ISSUED BY A PANEL OF IGNORANT, HATEFUL ASS FUCKS, NOT TO MENTION A DIRTY JURY, MEANING A JUROR THAT WAS PURPOSELY PICKED THAT WOULD AUTOMATICALLY GIVE A "GUILTY VERDICT' WITH LESS THAN AN HOUR OF DELIBERATION. PHYSICALLY ASSAULTED MORE THAN ONCE, DENIED MEDICAL ATTENTION FOR HIS WOUNDS AND LEFT TO SUFFER NOT ONLY THE BRUISES BY JAIL STAFF, BUT THE EMOTIONAL AND MENTAL TORTURE AND SUFFERING SEAN CONITNUES TO ENDURE DAILY.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
I FIND IT DISGUSTING AND DISTURBING THAT CHILDREN ABUSED BY THEIR SADISTIC MOTHER IS OVERLOOKED AND IGNORED BY OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM. WHAT ABOUT THE CHANGES THESE KIDS ARE GOING THROUGH? WHAT ABOUT THE MENTAL AND EMOTIONAL ABUSE THESE KIDS HAVE ENDURED AND TRIED TO SOMEHOW HANDLE? SEAN RIKER IS INNOCENT. HIS CHILDREN ARE GUILTY OF BEING VICTIMIZED BY THEIR HATEFUL, UNSTABLE MOTHER, TAYLER ANN RIKER. I CONTINUE TO SUPPORT SEAN, BECAUSE I BELIEVE. I BELIEVE OUR CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM CAN DEVIATE BEYOND THEIR SUPPOSED "HIDDEN" HATE FOR SEAN RIKER AND OPEN THEIR EYES AND REALIZE THAT THIS MAN IS INNOCENT. BUT AS I SIT AND LET THIS THOUGHT FLOURISH, I DOUBT THIS. CHILDREN ABUSED WILL EVENTUALLY SHOW SIGNS OF THEIR DAMAGED PERSONALITY CORRECT? A MAN, A WONDERFUL MAN, CRUSHED BY OUR SYSTEM CRIES OUT FOR HIS LIFE AND CHILDREN. IF TAYLER ANN RIKER IS SUCH A GREAT PERSON AND A VICTIM OF ABUSE AND VIOLENCE, WHY HAVE THE POLICE BEEN CALLED ON HER FOR ABUSE? WHY IS ONE OF THE CHILDREN IN FOSTER CARE? WHY HAVE THE THE CHILDREN'S LIFE BEEN JEOPARDIZED BY THIS ONE PERSON WHO IS SUPPOSEDLY A VICTIM OF ABUSE? LETS STEP INTO REALITY AND ACCEPT THAT REGARDLESS OF THE TRUST WE INSTALL IN OUR DESTRUCTIVE JUSTICE SYSTEM, THEY ARE NOT ALWAYS ACCURATE NOR RIGHT. I ASK FOR MANY PEOPLE WHO COME ACROSS THIS WEBSITE TO IGNORE THE REALITY AND HATRED OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM HAS CENTERED ON SEAN, TO LOOK BEYOND THE EXISITING PAINTED PICTURE COMPLIMENTS OF THE WISCONSIN JOURNAL TIMES, RACINE COUNTY COURT, AND TAYLER ANN RIKER TO TAKE A CHANCE AND INQUIRE ABOUT SEAN RIKER'S CASE. SEAN IS NOT A MONSTER NOR A DANGEROUS CRIMINAL TO OUR SOCIETY, IN FACT, HE'S VERY ALLURING AND YOU CAN TELL HE'S A MAN OF STRENGTH THAT CONTINUES TO FIGHT HARD. HIS ABILITY TO REACH BEYOND THE PRISON WALLS AND STILL SMILE AND LAUGH IS VALUED BY ME. I KNOW THAT THERE'S AN INNOCENT MAN WHO IS IN DIRE NEED OF A VOICE THAT CAN SPEAK ALOUD, ABOVE HIS AND WITH SOME HOPE AND FIGHT TO BREAK HIM FREE OF THESE COLD LONELY WALLS. BEFORE OPINIONS ARE FORMED ABOUT SEAN AND ANGER FUELED THOUGHTS TARGET SEAN, REMEMBER THAT ALTHOUGH, PEOPLE ARE INCARCERATED AND LABELED BY OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM, DOES NOT MEAN "GUILTY BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT". MANY INMATES INCARCERATED TODAY ARE SURPRISINGLY INNOCENT. THIS IS A PERCENTAGE OR I SHOULD SAY A STATISTIC THAT IS IGNORED, BUT WILL ALSO BE EXHAULTED WHEN THE TIMING IS RIGHT. MY WORDS HERE ARE NOT TO BADGER ANYONE NOR CORNER ANYONE ON THIS WRONGFUL INCARCERATION CASE, BUT TO TAKE THE TIME TO FULLY UNDERSTAND ALL FACTS IN THIS CASE. SEAN RIKER IS INNOCENT AND NEEDS ALL THE SUPPORT HE CAN GET. SEAN RIKER HAS TAUGHT ME TO BE APPRECIATIVE OF THE FREEDOM I HAVE TO DO WHAT I WANT, EVEN WHEN TIMES ARE TOUGH.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
EACH DAY I THINK ABOUT A MAN, IN A SMALL, LONELY CELL, TIRED, HOPELESS, AND MISSING HIS CHILDREN WHO NEED HIM. THE TRUTH NEEDS TO COME OUT AND BE TOLD ABOUT SEAN'S INNOCENCE AND HOW HIS KIDS HAVE BEEN ABUSED AND FORCED TO LIE BY THEIR MOTHER. WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE? HOW DO WE GIVE A MAN HIS LIFE BACK? HOW DO WE GIVE THESE CHILDREN THEIR LIVES BACK WHEN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM HAS FAILED THEM AND WILL NO LONGER PROTECT THEM? AN INNOCENT MAN'S LIFE WILL BE PERMANENTLY DESTROYED AND IT IS EXCEPTIONALLY CRITICAL THAT THE WRONGFULLY CONVICTED ARE NOT FORGOTTEN AND ALLOWED TO SHARE THEIR SIDE OF THE STORY AND TERROR THEY HAVE AND CONTINUE TO ENDURE.

Link http://www.unjustjusticeseanriker.blogspot.com/2012/02/unjust-justice.html

Thank you Megan for this great post of yours. I especially like the choice of words such as nefarious. That word is one of Sean's favorites. I think you've been drinking too much Koolaid, Megan. The only terror in Sean's life is the terror that he inflicts on others around him. I feel sorry for the prison employees who have to deal with him. Although I am very grateful that he is their problem now and not mine.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
More posts from Megan.

Tuesday, February 28, 2012SEANRIKERISINNOCENT
JUSTICE. TOO MANY PEOPLE CLAIMING THEIR INNOCENCE AS THEY DETERIORATE IN A SQUAMISH, SMALL, LIFELESS CELL, REDUCED TO A NUMBER ISSUED BY THE WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS. WE APPLAUD OUR CONSTITUTION FOR MULTIFARIOUS REASONS, MAINLY BECAUSE WE ARE APPRECIATIVE OF OUR RIGHTS AS OUTLINED IN THE BILL OF RIGHTS, THEY ARE SUPPOSE TO SHIELD US AGAINST THE DEVIANT MONSTERS THAT ARE GRANTED THE LEGAL AUTHORITY TO CRUCIFY US IF GUILTY OF COMMITTING CRIMES AND TO SHELTER THE INNOCENT FROM BEING A VICTIM OF CRIMES, BUT ARE THEY TRUELY RIGHTS? SHOULD WE EVER CHALLENGE THESE RIGHTS AS WE ARE TARGETED BY A SYSTEM WITH BADGES AND POWER? WHAT IS JUSTICE? AN INNOCENT MAN FACING THE DEATH PENALTY OR LIFE IN PRISON ON A RAPE OR MURDER CHARGE? AN INNOCENT MAN HATED BY THE JUSTICE SYSTEM BECAUSE HE HAD A PREVIOUS ENCOUNTER WITH THE LAW? WE ALL SEARCH FOR ANSWERS AND DEBATE ON HOW WE SHOULD HANDLE CRIMINALS. WE RANT AND ARE BOISTEROUS ABOUT OUR INNER DESIRES TO MAKE THE GUILTY CRIMINALS SUFFER FOR THEIR CRIMES. THERE IS MORE THAN ONE INNOCENT PERSON IN THIS SITUATION, KIDS. ENERGETIC, FLAMBOYANT, MEMORABLE, INNOCENT. SEAN: CHARMING, TALENTED, UNSELFISH, HARDWORKING, AND A DEDICATED, LOVING FATHER. SEAN. LABELED AS A REPEATED CHILD AND WIFE ABUSER. DEGRADING, CRUEL, UNCONTROLLABLE, AND PSYCHOTIC IS WHAT OUR GLORIFIED MEDIA HAS PORTRAYED HIM AS. CRIPPLED AND AT THE MERCY OF OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM IS NOT ONLY HAUNTING, BUT TERRIFYING. OUR CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM CLAIMS THEIR DESIRE TO PROTECT THE INNOCENCE, BUT HOW COME SEAN HAS BEEN REPEATEDLY DESTROYED AND LABELED AS A MONSTER?

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
A MAN, MAKING A MOVE DUE TO A PROMOTION BY HIS WORK, MOVING TO BETTER THE LIFE OF HIS FAMILY, IS QUICKLY DESTROYED BY THE CRAZINESS AND THE UNSTABLE PERSONA DEMONSTRATED BY HIS WIFE, WHO I FUCKEN REFUSE TO PROTECT FOR PRIVACY, TAYLER ANN RIKER OF FORT COLLINS, COLORADO. INTIMIDATION, POWER, MONEY, AUTHORITY AND IGNORANCE CIRCULATED THROUGH THE COURT ROOM, AS SEAN, WHO IS INNOCENCE AND HARMLESS, WAS PREVIOUSLY PROVOKED AND AGITATED BY POLICE WAS STRAPPED DOWN IN A RESTRAINT CHAIR, THIS MEANS LIMITED MOVEMENT, PAIN FROM THE STRAPS TIED TOO TIGHT, TREATED LIKE A SERIAL KILLER, FACING A EXPECTED GUILTY VERDICT ISSUED BY A PANEL OF IGNORANT, HATEFUL ASS FUCKS, NOT TO MENTION A DIRTY JURY, MEANING A JUROR THAT WAS PURPOSELY PICKED THAT WOULD AUTOMATICALLY GIVE A "GUILTY VERDICT' WITH LESS THAN AN HOUR OF DELIBERATION. PHYSICALLY ASSAULTED MORE THAN ONCE, DENIED MEDICAL ATTENTION FOR HIS WOUNDS AND LEFT TO SUFFER NOT ONLY THE BRUISES BY JAIL STAFF, BUT THE EMOTIONAL AND MENTAL TORTURE AND SUFFERING SEAN CONITNUES TO ENDURE DAILY. I FIND IT DISGUSTING AND DISTURBING THAT CHILDREN ABUSED BY THEIR SADISTIC MOTHER IS OVERLOOKED AND IGNORED BY OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM. WHAT ABOUT THE CHANGES THESE KIDS ARE GOING THROUGH? WHAT ABOUT THE MENTAL AND EMOTIONAL ABUSE THESE KIDS HAVE ENDURED AND TRIED TO SOMEHOW HANDLE? SEAN RIKER IS INNOCENT. HIS CHILDREN ARE GUILTY OF BEING VICTIMIZED BY THEIR HATEFUL, UNSTABLE MOTHER, TAYLER ANN RIKER. I CONTINUE TO SUPPORT SEAN, BECAUSE I BELIEVE. I BELIEVE OUR CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM CAN DEVIATE BEYOND THEIR SUPPOSED "HIDDEN" HATE FOR SEAN RIKER AND OPEN THEIR EYES AND REALIZE THAT THIS MAN IS INNOCENT. BUT AS I SIT AND LET THIS THOUGHT FLOURISH, I DOUBT THIS. CHILDREN ABUSED WILL EVENTUALLY SHOW SIGNS OF THEIR DAMAGED PERSONALITY CORRECT?

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
A MAN, A WONDERFUL MAN, CRUSHED BY OUR SYSTEM CRIES OUT FOR HIS LIFE AND CHILDREN. IF TAYLER ANN RIKER IS SUCH A GREAT PERSON AND A VICTIM OF ABUSE AND VIOLENCE, WHY HAVE THE POLICE BEEN CALLED ON HER FOR ABUSE? WHY IS ONE OF THE CHILDREN IN FOSTER CARE? WHY HAVE THE THE CHILDREN'S LIFE BEEN JEOPARDIZED BY THIS ONE PERSON WHO IS SUPPOSEDLY A VICTIM OF ABUSE? LETS STEP INTO REALITY AND ACCEPT THAT REGARDLESS OF THE TRUST WE INSTALL IN OUR DESTRUCTIVE JUSTICE SYSTEM, THEY ARE NOT ALWAYS ACCURATE NOR RIGHT. I ASK FOR MANY PEOPLE WHO COME ACROSS THIS WEBSITE TO IGNORE THE REALITY AND HATRED OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM HAS CENTERED ON SEAN, TO LOOK BEYOND THE EXISITING PAINTED PICTURE COMPLIMENTS OF THE WISCONSIN JOURNAL TIMES, RACINE COUNTY COURT, AND TAYLER ANN RIKER TO TAKE A CHANCE AND INQUIRE ABOUT SEAN RIKER'S CASE. SEAN IS NOT A MONSTER NOR A DANGEROUS CRIMINAL TO OUR SOCIETY, IN FACT, HE'S VERY ALLURING AND YOU CAN TELL HE'S A MAN OF STRENGTH THAT CONTINUES TO FIGHT HARD. HIS ABILITY TO REACH BEYOND THE PRISON WALLS AND STILL SMILE AND LAUGH IS VALUED BY ME. I KNOW THAT THERE'S AN INNOCENT MAN WHO IS IN DIRE NEED OF A VOICE THAT CAN SPEAK ALOUD, ABOVE HIS AND WITH SOME HOPE AND FIGHT TO BREAK HIM FREE OF THESE COLD LONELY WALLS. BEFORE OPINIONS ARE FORMED ABOUT SEAN AND ANGER FUELED THOUGHTS TARGET SEAN, REMEMBER THAT ALTHOUGH, PEOPLE ARE INCARCERATED AND LABELED BY OUR JUSTICE SYSTEM, DOES NOT MEAN "GUILTY BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT". MANY INMATES INCARCERATED TODAY ARE SURPRISINGLY INNOCENT. THIS IS A PERCENTAGE OR I SHOULD SAY A STATISTIC THAT IS IGNORED, BUT WILL ALSO BE EXHAULTED WHEN THE TIMING IS RIGHT. MY WORDS HERE ARE NOT TO BADGER ANYONE NOR CORNER ANYONE ON THIS WRONGFUL INCARCERATION CASE, BUT TO TAKE THE TIME TO FULLY UNDERSTAND ALL FACTS IN THIS CASE.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
SEAN RIKER IS INNOCENT AND NEEDS ALL THE SUPPORT HE CAN GET. SEAN RIKER HAS TAUGHT ME TO BE APPRECIATIVE OF THE FREEDOM I HAVE TO DO WHAT I WANT, EVEN WHEN TIMES ARE TOUGH. EACH DAY I THINK ABOUT A MAN, IN A SMALL, LONELY CELL, TIRED, HOPELESS, AND MISSING HIS CHILDREN WHO NEED HIM. THE TRUTH NEEDS TO COME OUT AND BE TOLD ABOUT SEAN'S INNOCENCE AND HOW HIS KIDS HAVE BEEN ABUSED AND FORCED TO LIE BY THEIR MOTHER. WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE? HOW DO WE GIVE A MAN HIS LIFE BACK? HOW DO WE GIVE THESE CHILDREN THEIR LIVES BACK WHEN THE JUSTICE SYSTEM HAS FAILED THEM AND WILL NO LONGER PROTECT THEM? AN INNOCENT MAN'S LIFE WILL BE PERMANENTLY DESTROYED AND IT IS EXCEPTIONALLY CRITICAL THAT THE WRONGFULLY CONVICTED ARE NOT FORGOTTEN AND ALLOWED TO SHARE THEIR SIDE OF THE STORY AND TERROR THEY HAVE AND CONTINUE TO ENDURE.

MEGAN DE OLIVEIRA.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
The following are comments from the blog above:

BrasilFebruary 28, 2012 7:05 PM
This is all true, there is no better way to say this. It is very disheartening and disturbing that our legal system is okay with treating citizens so badly. Tayler Ann Riker is an abusive, rageful, sadistic, and unstable Mother that has abused her children emotionally, mentally, and physically. The Police Department where she resides has been called out to her residents more than once, requiring CPS to step in and be an advocate for the children that are suffering at her hands. She makes false statements and conjures up lies to make herself look like the battered, mistreated wife, when she is guilty for child abuse and neglect. Sean would be free and with his children today, if his wife hadn't snapped and went on a rampage about false mistreatments of the children. Two people suffer here, Sean and the children and justice is going to prevail and knock out all those who have voluntarily put in all the extra efforts to assure that Sean's life is destroyed. This day may take awhile to arrive, but when it does the truth will be exposed about Tayler Riker and what really happened during their marriage up until she made false police reports to have Sean arrested and incarcerated.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Another vile comment directed towards me. The hate these women feel for me is crazy. Their life or death attitude towards supporting Sean is scary.

BrasilMarch 26, 2012 1:15 PM
Another month has passed, nother court date proceeded with unfavorble results. I've had the privilege to hear Sean prove and speak of his innocents, but most of all to find out what he's all about. I know his innocence is realistic and can be proven, it just will take time for this to circulate through the court system, and also to have a fair judge that will scrutinize the true facts of this case, instead of listening to false jail statements and testimony from his psychotic, mentally/psychologically unstable, vindictive,lying cunt ex wife that has put in the extra efforts to conjure up lies and neglect/abuse her own children to make a point about Seans actions and behavior towards the children and herself. What Tayler Anne Riker doesnt understand is that she's in the spotlight and on the justice system's fucken hit list. Shes talking alot of shit, put on the crying, deviant, abusive wife persona to reel in the prosecution team, jury, and the judge to rule in her favor so that Sean's life will be isolated, damaging, and thrown away due to a stacked jury and the continuous lies by Tayler Riker. Noone listen to this cogniving and lying bitch, she has ruined not only Sean's life,but her own children, who cannot fight for themselves. If you do not enjoy being a Mother, dont put your anger, bitterness, and rage onto your children because you're intensely fucked in the head. I ask how Sean can sleep each night knowing that his life is in the hands of a corrupted justice system, which is suppose to be the best system in the world, lamentably this is all wrong. On the opposite end of the scale, I ask how Tayler Riker can sleep well and not be interrupted by her own self conscious and behavior she has about her children and the anger towards Sean. Sean is a genuine Man, with alot of love for his children, he cares alot and would do anything to protect his kids and to give them a healthy, safe stable life, but the courts have been doing an excellent job of preventing that to happen.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Altogether, Sean Riker slowly crumbles each day from a cold, ugly, disturbing cell, to have very little support to get through this horrific nightmare hes been captured in for the last few years. In, all I dissect this case, with what little evidence Sean has provided Me, and do not understand how a legal system go operate ethically and fair when they have painted a nasty, false picture of Sean. Our system is biased and discriminatory and all Sean has done to receive this treatment was to prove his innocence and love and care for the children who continue to struggle withut protection, but consumed by fears, tears, anger, and confusion. Again, I am aware of the lies Tayler Riker continues to speak, I am aware of the Wisconsin Journal Times sic infatuation with Sean to paint a picture of this evil, abuse,and out of control Man that gets off by abusing children and women. A recent court date's verdict revealed a 200 year sentence, plus over 70 years of probation, with confidence, support, and appreciation we turn to Sean's lawyer to fight hard repeatedly to provide legit evidence of his innocence so Sean does not have to be a prisoner treated like a fucken piece of trash that should be ignored and left to be vulnerable and slowly deteriorate. So Tayler Riker, fuck off you lying cunt, your chance of being targeted by the justice system is on the rise, but you dont see it yet, but it will knock your ass out and then we can enjoy every second of torture you deserve for what you have done to Sean, as well as your children....again Fuck Off.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
KeishaMarch 27, 2012 1:49 PM
Tayler had me fooled for awhile with all the messages she & her kids sent to me. She made me feel so bad for being on Sean's side and not believeing in her. She said that because I was on Sean's side I was pretty much calling the kids liars. She kept telling me she had proof & photos of where he abused the kids. She had her kids tell me all kinds of stuff and I was really starting to feel bad about everything. For a min. she had me even believing in her & doubting Sean. Sean told me she would play me but I didn't want to believe that. I thought I could play her & maybe if I could get close to the children I could get them to admit that Sean never abused them & that Tayler put them up to telling lies. But I was wrong. When I seen at the trial where the psychologist said the kids were influenced by the mother to lie I thought for sure Sean would win the case. I can not believe that they found him quilty and sentenced him to 200 years with no proof. Tayler said she could prove to me that he did hurt her & the kids. She said she had photos of the marks on the children. Well, I didn't see any of that at the trial. They convicted Sean only on what the kids said that matched what was said in home videos. Are you freaking kidding me?? Sean hates me now because I lost faith in him and didn't know who to listen to. I can't change how he feels but I can tell you I am very sorry and I DO want to believe in him and continue to fight for & support Sean. Especially when I learned that Tayler left a nasty message on Angel's facebook page saying that she got what she deserved. That right there proves to me that Tayler is evil hearted and I can not believe she even had me doubt Sean's innocence. But like I said she is very good at what she does. She is the kind of person who could con a con. Everyone talks about Sean going off and this and that. Well, if they were in his situation and innocent like Sean is I am sure they would go off too.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
I really do not know much about the courts and ect. but if there is ANYTHING I can do to prove that I really am sorry for ever doubting Sean and that I DO want to fight for him then I'll do it! Just let me know. You can even write to me or even call me. I don't care. Just want him to know how sorry I really am and I will spend the rest of my life fighting for him & doing whatever it takes just to show that I DO care & believe in him. Also, if Tayler is really mean to those kids is there anyone who can take her to court & fight for custody of the kids. I am sure Sean is worried to death about his children and how they are being treated while he is locked up. It's not fair that he can't even talk to his own kids. How can they do this to him with no proof of what Tayler said?? She is a good liar. Even had me fooled for awhile. Sean, if you are reading this I want you to know that I am truly sorry & will do ANYTHING to prove it and ANYTHING I can do within my power to help you, fight for you, & get you out of prison. Anyone who wants to call me my cell number is (937)367-0394. I doubt anyone will call but it sure would mean alot if they did. I hope he get's out someday and that his innocence is proven beyond a shadow of a doubt.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Another comment from Brasil. This woman is hateful. Brasil, what on earth makes you feel such hate for domestic violence survivors and women you don't even know.


Brasil March 27, 2012 4:48 PM
So you got sucked in by that lying cunt, she's sneaky and cogniving. Tayler is guilty for damaging those kids emotions and life. These kids have done nothing for Tayler to abuse and neglect them for years, and our courts cannot see this ongoing cycle of hatred for Sean and his children. The fake tears she presented to the court when she testified was accepted by the judge, while Sean's words of truth were shit on by the courts all at the hands of Tayler Riker. I care about Sean so much and been supporting him ever since I inquired about his case, I will continue to support him and do anything to get his life. Although, Sean does write his children, the faces of his children are only a memory to him. The reason why the Wisconsin Court System has convicted Sean on no evidence is because Tayler continues to lie and the courts feed off of women who are abused by their husbands, but on the horizon is Sean's freedom. I want nothing more, but to get my hands on Tayler Riker and the fucken bullshit she has put Sean and the kids through since her marriage with Sean. DO NOT believe the words that Tayler speaks, she only lies.

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Another comment from the above blog. Please notice the absolute unquestioned faith Sean requires of his followers. Even asking or questioning him on anything and he will remove you from his ilfe. Sean doesn't like being questioned. Absolute blind alligance is all he wants. And now this woman will do "anything" to prove her loyalty to Sean. Like seriously, this is scary. Are you going to kidnap my children? Or come and try to kill me? What does "anything" mean. According to Sean above "anything" included sucide for Angel. Thank God that woman only killed herself and didn't try to kill me too.

Keisha March 28, 2012 7:21 PM
I just hated that I had to find out the hard way. I can't even imagine what those kids are going through. Thank GOD someone (like you) is standing by him & supporting him. Next time you talk to him PLEASE tell him I am sorry for letting him down. Tell him I am willing to do absolutely ANYTHING to prove that I truly am sorry and if there is anything I can do to help just let me know. Also, I know trust doesn't come easy. Especailly when you let someone down. But like I said before she is good at what she does and she really made me feel like I was a bad person. A few months ago I didn't know who to trust or listen to. Now I do. But I don't know if it even matters to him anymore

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Sean being featured in the ADL yearly review of crimes committed by white supremacists.

Selected White Supremacist Criminal Incidents, 2009-2012


Posted: August 8, 2012


The white supremacist movement in the United States has a strong association with violence and criminal activity, ranging from traditional crimes such as drug dealing or domestic violence to ideologically-related crimes ranging from hate crimes to act of terrorism. Every week new criminal incidents emerge.

Selected white supremacist-related criminal incidents from recent years are shown below:


Norway, Wisconsin, November 2009: Sean Riker, a white supremacist affiliated with the gang Nazi Low Riders, a racist prison and street gang, is arrested on charges of possession of a firearm, possession of a short barreled rifle, first-degree recklessly endangering public safety, battery, strangulation, sexual abuse of a child, child abuse, and causing mental harm to a child. Riker was found guilty and sentenced to 200 years in prison.

survivor Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
Sean Riker is the reason we have prisons in the first place. He is exactly where he needs to be -- locked up behind bars. His violent acts would only continue were he to be released now, or 50 years from now.

SAH Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
bravo "survivor" and whoeveryouwantmetobe. These monsters will NEVER be ok in society.

did anybody look at my research on REClarke?

he spells one game but smells another.

Here is a POSITIVE note, tho.

I researched/read an inmate and I came with a Marcus Rogers. He is #377571 at One Corrections Center in Stanley, WI. 54768.

The reason I think this inmate deserves attention/stands out is because HE OWNED HIS CRIME.

I've always said I will SUPPORT those who are remorseful.... I definitely believe Marcus is one.

Can we get together and get him what he needs?
Thank you. I WILL

SAH Posted 7 years, 7 months ago. ✓ Mailed 7 years, 7 months ago   Favorite
BTB STAFF: PLEASE PUT THIS COMM TO INMATE MARCUS ROGERS #377571 AT ONE CORRECTIONS CENTER IN STANLEY, WI 54768.

Thank You.

SAH

Nathaniel Lindell Posted 7 years, 5 months ago.   Favorite
(scanned reply – view as blog post)

We will print and mail your reply by . Guidelines

Other posts by this author

Subscribe

Get notifications when new letters or replies are posted!

Posts by Nathaniel Lindell: RSS email me
Comments on “Interview Of An Innocent Man”: RSS email me
Featured posts: RSS email me
All Between the Bars posts: RSS