nf7c August 19.2020

Dear Julia,

No worries! (drew smiley face) i will explore possible
legal challenged to the unfair parole
denial, which in my opinion was a
case study in anti-trans bias and U.S
political prisoner, repression. For example,
the BPH Comprehensive Risk Assessment
(CRA), which admittedly included factual
errors and "anti-trians bias", which the
BPH partially corrected and excused
as psychologist "opinions" by BPH
Forensic Psychologist S.Hoyu=t which were
made permissible by the suggestion that
I could object or refute them at hearing.
Additionally, they apparently issued
"confidential information" and a revised
CRA as evidence, which i wasn't
provided disclosure of or allowed to
object and refute at the hearing under
threat of being removed from the hearing
unless i "shut up" in the words of
the Commissioner Maria Gutierrez.

In any case, My state appointed attorney
Richard Rutledge, Esq. of Rutledge and

nf7c page 2

Associates in Aptos, California. was
not much help either. Not only did he
not helo me prepare. he misled me
simply "hold" all my documentary evidence
until the day of my hearing. However,
he failed to inform me of a 21 page
limit on "day of hearing" document
inclusion, which led to much of my
supporting evidence to be excluded and the support letters or certificates
i was able to have included was simply
discounted and left unread by the
BPH panel!

The panel recommendation were that
i get "no more 115s OR 128As" (disciplinary
rule-violations), "work to reduce custody
level; stay discipline free; Earn positive
chronos." Also, "As Available: Get self-help;
Learn a trade." Unfortunately, due to the
COVID-19 shut down, such self-help and
vocational programs have not been available
in the prisons since March 2020, and won't
be for the foreseeable future - which is
indefinitely! wish me luck!
- Jennifer Rose