Hello, I'm serving a life sentence for crimes I did not commit. I am a victim of a grave injustice. I am appealing my conviction and the outcome is favorable but I need your help. I do not seek money. First and foremost I need a friend. I also need someone to set up a website in my name so my evidence of my innocence can be posted to counter all the vicious lies on the web about me. I'm looking for a fighter, a solid heart that believes there is injustice in the court system. A selfless person that has the gumption and will power to right a wrong. Someone that will stand up for me. Someone who is a gangster at heart. I am desperate for help. or if you are in need of something within my power. I will help you instead. I am intelligent and a great listerner. I have a huge heart filled with compassion for those in need.
I hope you write. Lastly, I'm straight. I know, gay hearts are breaking all over the world :-) but I don't judge. So feel free to write.
Take care
Nathan - this shows that Sean asks his supporters of more than just stamps and paper to write on. He is actively looking for women to harass me.
I am speaking of Angel's suicide because Sean himself said Angel committied suicide and he said the reason was her pain over his wrongful conviction. It's on this page farther up in a handwritten response from Sean. I will quote it here: "Also, on Dec 7, 2001 my diance committed suicide after learning of my wrongful conviction." And for those who still believe Sean you must believe this statement of his also above in handwritten response : "I am Sean Anthony Riker and anything I say is factual and if I can't back it up with proof I will not voice it." But Nathan says on Moderating the Sean Riker debate that "1) Sean lied in his prisoninmates.com ad - what Sean said about himself is true, except his imminent release + DNA evidence (there were no fluids from which NDA could be extracted from), which express dream. If a lie, a white one." Nathan, you and Sean need to do a better job at this. Your slip ups are ridiculous. You two can't keep what day it is straight let alone any factual information.
Page labeled #106 as part of the handwritten response from Sean Riker himself: "In my cell @ 2 a.m. I was watching my favorite move when the cop brought me my mail." - Proof that Sean has a tv in his cell for personal use. Or Sean is lying about having a tv. Yet in Nathan's blog "Moderating the Sean Riker debate" Nathan Lindell claims that Sean is too poor to own a tv. Quoted "As for your attempt to slur Sean as using anyone for commisary money. That's hilarious. He asks his supporters for books, stamped envelopes, paper and scented oil. The man doesn't even have a personal T.V....."
Yet Nathan also claims he knows Sean well enough that he posted this: "My read on Sean's body language, which I study and have notes from multiple texts on "kinesics" (body language), is he was being truthful when he told me he was innocent...."
It makes me sick how awful our law inforcement is! They get away with everything becuase they have to upper hand in the judges eye's their just doing their job. HAHA. right! I bet their are way more DIRTY cops then their are legit! I could'nt amagine being in your shoes hun. But it sounds like you have a good shoulder on your head so keep your head held high and just smile at the fake ass law inforcement around you!
Sweetpea: I posted everything I did without first reading any new posts. Which means I did not see your apology to me before unleashing my hurt and anger. You have to understand my position. I suffered at the hands of Sean for four years, and so did my kids. After the horror of my marriage I finally had the courage to leave. Either that or I was finally willing to die trying. When I left I had no idea that I would be subjected to the hell Sean has inflicted on me. He has sued me in state and federal court more than a dozen times. Brought me back to divorce court countless time. He taunts me. He writes horrible things about me that aren't true on the internet, to the judge in Colorado and other people. He writes horrible things about me to my family, social services ect. It never ends. This is my life. I can't escape this. I keep getting dragged back in by new lawsuits and new blogs such as this. By being aware of them and fighting them back it gives the power of knowledge. I have to know the enemy to fight it. I made some rude remarks to you above. I am sorry. I got personal and just mean towards you. I am hurt! I am so hurt from three years of these blogs and people saying what happened to me really didn't happen. It hurts. And because it's my children I don't think I have to put their priavte info on the computer for random women to see. You are like one of 20 women who have contacted me. You have been the only one though that has ever apologized to me. I accept your apology. And I would like to offer you my own. I am sorry that the rage I feel inside for Sean was unleashed on you. I am sorry I made rude remarks about you. I don't think you're stupid. Maybe too trusting while I am too cynical. Thank you for believing me, Tayler Riker
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/577090/St-George-bomber-pleads-guilty.html St. George bomber pleads guilty
Published: Thursday, Aug. 14 1997 12:00 a.m.
Sean Riker has admitted making and detonating five pipe bombs in St. George two years ago.
Riker, 29, pleaded guilty to five counts of use of an explosive device Tuesday before U.S. District Judge Dee Benson.The bombs exploded at Star Flag and Display on July 31, 1995; at Dixie Auto Sales on Aug. 4, 1995; at Woodward Elementary School on Aug. 5, 1995; and at Agave bookstore on Sept. 23, 1995.
Two bombs were set off at the school.
The bookstore, badly damaged and no longer in business, was bombed to disguise a burglary, Riker said.
"At the time I was heavily on methamphetamines . . . . It was just to see how powerful (the pipe bombs) were," he told Benson.
Federal prosecutors will seek a prison sentence of more than 11 years at Riker's Oct. 27 sentencing.
As part of his plea bargain, he must tell state prosecutors about burglaries he committed in St. George.
His former roommate and co-defendant, Paula Castillo Rogers, has pleaded guilty to two charges. Her sentencing is set for Sept. 30.
The bookstore, badly damaged and no longer in business, was bombed to disguise a burglary, Riker said.
"At the time I was heavily on methamphetamines . . . . It was just to see how powerful (the pipe bombs) were," he told Benson.
How does a out-of-business bookstore relate to you bombing places involved in sex crimes against children Sean? And you either are lying to us or you lied to the judge since this article quotes you as saying you bombed those places to cover up burgarlies and just to see how strong the bombs were. You are so lame.
If you have alot of cancer cases in your family, you will likely have the genes. So you probably can´t run away from knowing the risk. ;-)
As I wrote at the other place where this comment response of yours has been posted: You are free not to believe in a loving God but sorry, I don´t see any reason of not bringing God into it. These unborn babies should be worth less that God´s gifts just because some criminal killed other children?
God has given people freedom to decide to be good or bad. This will be over some day but at the moment, unfortunately we have to live with the wrong decisions of others. But for me, this doesn´t mean there is no God.
Of course, I can stop posting like that. But that would mean I´d stop reading your blogposts. You don´t like being told what to write and what not? It´s the same for me. Besides, who knows who else beside you will read your posts and the responses? Who knows whom one can help in his or her doubts?
For me, it´s simply unfair....we all want to be free to make our own decisions, to live our life as we want to, don´t we? And when God gives us this freedom, we thank him by accusing him when the freedom is misused.
Were my answers deleted or did I answer at the wrong place? (Think your responses are posted several times.)
I don´t believe atheists mean the danger for believers when they say religion is dangerous. I often heard "religion is the root of all evil". That´s probably more what they mean.
Naw, Jesus didn´t intend to bring chaos. I don´t think so. If it was up to him (leaving our freedom of decision away) we´d follow what he taught us and if all of us here on earth did, it would be a better place. He was just intelligent enough to know what would be coming up to his followers and he prepared them for that. ;-)
PS "Please don´t bring God into it" - Ronnie, it´s completely up to you to say you don´t believe in a God (or at least not in a loving God). But if you want to get comments, you´ll have to accept that people thinking different write their opinion. This contains God too, if the comment writer is a believer.
Of course, I can stop leaving such comments if that´s your wish, but then it would mean I´d stop reading your blogposts. You don´t like if someone tells you what to write and what not, right? Same with me. No one forces you to agree and to change your own mind. But I want to be free to leave more than only what you´d like to hear (especially as that doesn´t attack you).
Besides I see another point: It´s not only you reading the comments. Who knows who the others are, what doubts they have and which other opinions than yours may help them along? My faith is very important to me and so I´ll try to say something to answer possible questions as good as I can - if not for you, then maybe for others.
The author Franz Werfel wrote as an idiom at the beginning of the novel "Das Lied von Bernadette" (means "The song of Bernadette" - no idea under which title it was published in English): For the one who wants to believe, there´s enough light, and for the one who doesn´t, enough darkness.
Well, I guess you can´t escape from knowing if you have cancer genes. If there were many cases of cancer in your family already, then it´s more than likely you have those genes too.
RSS
I am a victim of a grave injustice. I am appealing my conviction and the outcome is favorable but I need your help. I do not seek money. First and foremost I need a friend. I also need someone to set up a website in my name so my evidence of my innocence can be posted to counter all the vicious lies on the web about me.
I'm looking for a fighter, a solid heart that believes there is injustice in the court system. A selfless person that has the gumption and will power to right a wrong. Someone that will stand up for me. Someone who is a gangster at heart. I am desperate for help. or if you are in need of something within my power. I will help you instead. I am intelligent and a great listerner. I have a huge heart filled with compassion for those in need.
I hope you write.
Lastly, I'm straight. I know, gay hearts are breaking all over the world :-) but I don't judge. So feel free to write.
Take care
Nathan - this shows that Sean asks his supporters of more than just stamps and paper to write on. He is actively looking for women to harass me.
"Also, on Dec 7, 2001 my diance committed suicide after learning of my wrongful conviction."
And for those who still believe Sean you must believe this statement of his also above in handwritten response : "I am Sean Anthony Riker and anything I say is factual and if I can't back it up with proof I will not voice it."
But Nathan says on Moderating the Sean Riker debate that "1) Sean lied in his prisoninmates.com ad - what Sean said about himself is true, except his imminent release + DNA evidence (there were no fluids from which NDA could be extracted from), which express dream. If a lie, a white one."
Nathan, you and Sean need to do a better job at this. Your slip ups are ridiculous. You two can't keep what day it is straight let alone any factual information.
Page labeled #106 as part of the handwritten response from Sean Riker himself:
"In my cell @ 2 a.m. I was watching my favorite move when the cop brought me my mail." - Proof that Sean has a tv in his cell for personal use. Or Sean is lying about having a tv.
Yet in Nathan's blog "Moderating the Sean Riker debate" Nathan Lindell claims that Sean is too poor to own a tv. Quoted "As for your attempt to slur Sean as using anyone for commisary money. That's hilarious. He asks his supporters for books, stamped envelopes, paper and scented oil. The man doesn't even have a personal T.V....."
Yet Nathan also claims he knows Sean well enough that he posted this: "My read on Sean's body language, which I study and have notes from multiple texts on "kinesics" (body language), is he was being truthful when he told me he was innocent...."
one love,
nikki
I posted everything I did without first reading any new posts. Which means I did not see your apology to me before unleashing my hurt and anger.
You have to understand my position. I suffered at the hands of Sean for four years, and so did my kids. After the horror of my marriage I finally had the courage to leave. Either that or I was finally willing to die trying.
When I left I had no idea that I would be subjected to the hell Sean has inflicted on me. He has sued me in state and federal court more than a dozen times. Brought me back to divorce court countless time. He taunts me. He writes horrible things about me that aren't true on the internet, to the judge in Colorado and other people. He writes horrible things about me to my family, social services ect. It never ends.
This is my life. I can't escape this. I keep getting dragged back in by new lawsuits and new blogs such as this. By being aware of them and fighting them back it gives the power of knowledge. I have to know the enemy to fight it.
I made some rude remarks to you above. I am sorry. I got personal and just mean towards you. I am hurt! I am so hurt from three years of these blogs and people saying what happened to me really didn't happen. It hurts. And because it's my children I don't think I have to put their priavte info on the computer for random women to see. You are like one of 20 women who have contacted me. You have been the only one though that has ever apologized to me.
I accept your apology. And I would like to offer you my own. I am sorry that the rage I feel inside for Sean was unleashed on you. I am sorry I made rude remarks about you. I don't think you're stupid. Maybe too trusting while I am too cynical.
Thank you for believing me,
Tayler Riker
St. George bomber pleads guilty
Published: Thursday, Aug. 14 1997 12:00 a.m.
Sean Riker has admitted making and detonating five pipe bombs in St. George two years ago.
Riker, 29, pleaded guilty to five counts of use of an explosive device Tuesday before U.S. District Judge Dee Benson.The bombs exploded at Star Flag and Display on July 31, 1995; at Dixie Auto Sales on Aug. 4, 1995; at Woodward Elementary School on Aug. 5, 1995; and at Agave bookstore on Sept. 23, 1995.
Two bombs were set off at the school.
The bookstore, badly damaged and no longer in business, was bombed to disguise a burglary, Riker said.
"At the time I was heavily on methamphetamines . . . . It was just to see how powerful (the pipe bombs) were," he told Benson.
Federal prosecutors will seek a prison sentence of more than 11 years at Riker's Oct. 27 sentencing.
As part of his plea bargain, he must tell state prosecutors about burglaries he committed in St. George.
His former roommate and co-defendant, Paula Castillo Rogers, has pleaded guilty to two charges. Her sentencing is set for Sept. 30.
The bookstore, badly damaged and no longer in business, was bombed to disguise a burglary, Riker said.
"At the time I was heavily on methamphetamines . . . . It was just to see how powerful (the pipe bombs) were," he told Benson.
How does a out-of-business bookstore relate to you bombing places involved in sex crimes against children Sean? And you either are lying to us or you lied to the judge since this article quotes you as saying you bombed those places to cover up burgarlies and just to see how strong the bombs were. You are so lame.
So you probably can´t run away from knowing the risk. ;-)
As I wrote at the other place where this comment response of yours has been posted:
You are free not to believe in a loving God but sorry, I don´t see any reason of not bringing God into it.
These unborn babies should be worth less that God´s gifts just because some criminal killed other children?
God has given people freedom to decide to be good or bad. This will be over some day but at the moment, unfortunately we have to live with the wrong decisions of others. But for me, this doesn´t mean there is no God.
Of course, I can stop posting like that. But that would mean I´d stop reading your blogposts.
You don´t like being told what to write and what not?
It´s the same for me.
Besides, who knows who else beside you will read your posts and the responses? Who knows whom one can help in his or her doubts?
For me, it´s simply unfair....we all want to be free to make our own decisions, to live our life as we want to, don´t we?
And when God gives us this freedom, we thank him by accusing him when the freedom is misused.
I don´t believe atheists mean the danger for believers when they say religion is dangerous.
I often heard "religion is the root of all evil". That´s probably more what they mean.
Naw, Jesus didn´t intend to bring chaos. I don´t think so. If it was up to him (leaving our freedom of decision away) we´d follow what he taught us and if all of us here on earth did, it would be a better place.
He was just intelligent enough to know what would be coming up to his followers and he prepared them for that. ;-)
"Please don´t bring God into it" -
Ronnie, it´s completely up to you to say you don´t believe in a God (or at least not in a loving God).
But if you want to get comments, you´ll have to accept that people thinking different write their opinion. This contains God too, if the comment writer is a believer.
Of course, I can stop leaving such comments if that´s your wish, but then it would mean I´d stop reading your blogposts.
You don´t like if someone tells you what to write and what not, right?
Same with me. No one forces you to agree and to change your own mind. But I want to be free to leave more than only what you´d like to hear (especially as that doesn´t attack you).
Besides I see another point:
It´s not only you reading the comments.
Who knows who the others are, what doubts they have and which other opinions than yours may help them along?
My faith is very important to me and so I´ll try to say something to answer possible questions as good as I can - if not for you, then maybe for others.
The author Franz Werfel wrote as an idiom at the beginning of the novel "Das Lied von Bernadette" (means "The song of Bernadette" - no idea under which title it was published in English):
For the one who wants to believe, there´s enough light, and for the one who doesn´t, enough darkness.
Well, I guess you can´t escape from knowing if you have cancer genes.
If there were many cases of cancer in your family already, then it´s more than likely you have those genes too.