Oct. 31, 2011

To Be Or Not to Be.... A Criminal

by David Troupe (author's profile)

Transcription

To Be Or Not To Be... A Criminal
October 7, 2011

"You show me someone that doesn't have a price, I'll show you someone that never got the right offer."

How do we become criminals? Let me clarify, I'm not interested in how to commit a crime and be considered a criminal, but in some of us will ignore the laws and do as we please.

Some might call us career criminals, but why are we like this?

Why is it I've helped a neighbor with her kittens yet will break into a car for electronics?
What motivates us to ignore laws?
What key factor separates criminals from non-criminals (besides violating the law)? :)

I have an active mind, yet I opened most of my time creating ways to beat the system. Even if it's usually to help someone out it's still wrong. So, why do I think the way I do?

Do we all have thoughts that if acted on would violate law?

I've met some criminals that could't think through simple problems and others that could figure out ways to get sugar passed through the ventilation ducts. So, if being a criminal is not intellectually based, what about motivation? What would you do if the price is right?
What if the benefits greatly outweighed the punishment?

Every day we take risks. Using the shower, stove, car, all a risk. Some take greater risks: mountain climbing, flying, marriage. :) All for a gain with a consequence.

Are criminals nothing more than people seeking a test limits, gain an actual object or just enjoy winning the challenge? Risk takers?

Any ideas on what separates you from me? Besides concrete walls.
What allows us to go through with breaking the law?
If the price was right would you take the risk? Why?

Always,
[signature]

Favorite

Replies (1) Replies feed

Liza Posted 12 years, 3 months ago. ✓ Mailed 12 years, 3 months ago   Favorite
Is it crime or unacceptability? For instance, if someone takes a life while defending themselves we call it justifyable, if its an accident then it becomes manslaughter, but if it is intentional it's murder. So where are the guidelines? Morality of course, but then who sets those standards? Humans do, so really it comes down to what is humane and what is not. Helping kittens- very humane, robbing the same people later - mistake, but if you only helped with the kittens to aid in your later theft...then that is not humane. When you are stealing to support your family does the rule change? Of course not, theft is theft, murder is murder. How you "feel" about the crime I think is what sets it apart. If you feel bad for having hurt someone then you have the morality to have made a better choice. However, if you only feel bad for having been caught then your morility is useless and your humanity non-existent. Price and risk are a funny thing, what I might be willing to do is different then what someone else might be willing to do...and of course the reasoning will also be different. I would give my life for my son, but would I give it if it was to help him hurt someone else?... No, I don't think I would...but someone else might for their child. We are no different out here...the same thoughts and ideas run through our minds... when you don't have money to pay bills or put food on the table and it feels like the only alternative is to rob someone, the thoughts are most definitly present, the ideas running rampant, but the decision to not do it is what sets us apart. The notion that if I'm caught and go to jail I would be no better off helping than I am now and I would also be away from ever helping when I could, is not the only reason... There is something that clicks in my mind, something that says that it feels wrong. That little voice of humanity and morality kicks in, that not only am I jeopordizing myself, but I'm hurting someone else...that's what would stop me. Its not someone being more intelligent than another, but I think some of us act on our thoughts before our brains have time to suss out the situation. Patience I hear after all, is a virtue. So to answer your question, the difference between us on the outside and those on the inside is time. Given more time to think through what you had done, would you still have done it?

XOXO, Sissy

We will print and mail your reply by . Guidelines

Other posts by this author

Subscribe

Get notifications when new letters or replies are posted!

Posts by David Troupe: RSS email me
Comments on “To Be Or Not to Be.... A Criminal”: RSS email me
Featured posts: RSS email me
All Between the Bars posts: RSS