June 28, 2012

Piecing Together Evidence of Racketeering

by Milo Rose (author's profile)

Transcription

Milo Rose - blog entry: http://betweenthebars.org/blogs/5296

Piecing Together Evidence of Racketeering

Shortly after I had been granted a stay of execution in 1987, when the trial judge ruled she would only give me an evidentiary hearing on the sentencing issues of my appeal. I've seen on the television (world news) there was another first degree murder case on appeal out of Clearwater, Florida. Charging one of the detectives involved in my case, with police misconduct in his case. This is important to note: since I have been saying all along this same detective fabricated evidence in my case to make me appear overwhelmingly guilty. I immediately notified the attorneys appointed to represent me, about this case - but to no avail - which helps explain why the readily discoverable evidence to discredit the couple who testified against me went mysteriously undiscovered during this period of time. Since it appears these attorneys, and the judge, were working together to suppress the evidence of a much wider pattern of misconduct within Florida's legal community, and in so doing gambled on their self-incrimination of being complicit in the crime of racketeering, would go unprosecuted. So far their gamble has paid off!!! There are a couple other related pieces of evidence which demonstrate the pattern of misconduct taking place during this period of time. Two death row inmates from the same district court as me made a deal for their freedom after evidence of someone else possibly being the murderer in their case came to light, when evidence of this person's possible involvement in another murder surfaced. Coincidentally my case reveals a similar pattern, and would not have looked good coming to light too! Then there is the case of the jailhouse snitch, who was used in over 50 cases, and helped to send ten people to death row. The two attorneys who prosecuted my case are implicated in using the services of this jailhouse snitch's testimony in other cases they prosecuted, showing they were not above using any means possible to obtain a conviction; even to the degree of violating the integrity of the law. I strongly believe the scandal of my case of innocence coming to light at that time would have brought down Florida's death penalty. I can only pray for the same to occur now - beginning with my vindication. In my next entry I will expound more on my discovery of the evidence discrediting the couple who testified against me, while presenting more evidence of racketeering by a faction within Florida's legal community working collectively to obstruct justice in my case.

Respectfully,
Milo Rose

Favorite

Replies (1) Replies feed

OnTimeInCheckCC Posted 12 years, 2 months ago. ✓ Mailed 12 years, 2 months ago   Favorite
Jailhouse snitch testimony, if I am a juror, is not taken seriously by me because most likely it has been purchased somehow and that is pretty low to go! You are very correct about going against the law and how its truly meant to be utilized in court. I agree, I just wish more people wanted something done about it. I feel when I question things, the public wants to quiet me and not make waves but I cannot be that way, never. Never should the US execute anyone who is innocent and who did not receive a trial where the guilty verdict received included a case where their so called "supposed" GUILT WAS PROVED BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT regardless of what was said about the person, their past, where they were at the time, where they were not at the time of the crime, and so on so on, etc. The oath that jurors swear to is not to just go by who the person being defended IS in his or her everyday life and by just the sometimes damning wrongly stated words by prosecutors BUT THEY ARE TO: consider did the state do its job in proving guilt or not?? If not, then as a jury they should stick to their oath and not risk sending an innocent man or woman to death especially, for anything. Even if I was one of twelve only, who did not feel that the state did its supposed job of proving its case to me, Id do my best to explain to my fellow jurors that its only fair going by oath and the real original law that the trial end as a hung jury. Id not give in either. Stay strong Milo, please!

We will print and mail your reply by . Guidelines

Other posts by this author

Subscribe

Get notifications when new letters or replies are posted!

Posts by Milo Rose: RSS email me
Comments on “Piecing Together Evidence of Racketeering”: RSS email me
Featured posts: RSS email me
All Between the Bars posts: RSS