March 5, 2023

The Presumption Of Whiteness

by Dymitri Haraszewski (author's profile)

Transcription

Dymitri Haraszewski
Blog #1660
2-15-23

[At left, there is a picture of a young-looking man with brown-gray hair and a slight smile against an indistinct background. He is wearing a dark beaded necklace, black-rimmed rectangular glasses, a gray t-shirt and a yellow lanyard around his neck.]

The Presumption of Whiteness

After writing a few posts on murderous cops and their victims, I find my conscience nagging me to express some of my more challenging thoughts on this subject - I'll try.

Much ink has been spilled over whether Tyre Nichols' murder was different from George Floyd's because of their killers' skin tone. With Mr. Floyd, the easily digested consensus was that a "black" man was, naturally, offed by a racist "white" cop, but that oversimplified narrative never set well with me. For instance, did Derek Chauvin really need a particular color of neck beneath his knee to continue kneeling on it as a display of his authority? I never believed so, and now that Tyre's badge-brandishing murderers are "black", folks are scrambling to insist that the killer's color doesn't matter when that killer is a cop, because all shades of pig are equally likely to inflict lethally psychotic violence... so long as the victim is "black". Such a concession at least begins to correct what I see as the flawed post-Floyd analysis of police brutality, but this new truth-du-jour -- that the VICTIM'S skin is the crucial factor because all policing is inherently racist -- still seems to miss the mark.

Try this thought experiment: Imagine that all visible markers for discrimination have suddenly disappeared. Suppose that all brown skin, all oriental phenotypes, are just gone. Even dark hair and dark eyes, too. Now also imagine that police continue to exist in the same proportions and with the same training and mentality as they exist today. Do we suppose that the nature of coppism [sic] magically disappears in this scenario as well, and that police brutality ceases to be? That seems unlikely; instead, I'd bet our grinning blue goons would carry on with the beating and murdering of all those of us who aren't part of their tribe, just as viciously as they've always done simply inventing some new markers to determine who they can target for the worst of it. You see, fundamentally, I suspect the problem almost certainly isn't racism per-se, but something more like TRIBALISM; and no, I am not oblivious to the fact that, all things being equal, cops are more likely to kill a "black" person than a "white" one because they (correctly) assume that their excuses for it will be more readily accepted. Yes, this fact is sickening evidence of a pervasive historical racism that must be resolved, but does it always demonstrate individual racial animosity in cops who kill "black" people today? Not necessarily, and after many years of witnessing the largely unbridled violence of cops in prisons, I'd argue that pigs will abuse non-pigs indiscriminately, with no racial prejudice or preference, whenever they believe they can get away with it. I realize this idea strongly contradicts the conventional wisdom, so let me try to explain.

To the best of my knowledge, roughly 40% of California's prison population is "black" and 60% is everything else, a far higher percentage than California's non-caged "black" population. (I base these numbers on my own observations and old statistics; if anyone has more accurate data, please let me know!) Obviously, "black" people are terribly over-represented in prison, which clearly suggests some serious systemic "racial" problems. However, after many years inside every security level from minimum to maximum across 14 different prison yards, I've known of countless inmates abused by guards... and guess what? Very few of those incidents have involved "black" prisoners. In fact, I have never personally seen a "black" man beaten up in prison (not counting the violence guards use to break up fights), though I've directly witnessed dozens of "white" and Hispanic prisoners unjustifiably manhandled over the years. To be clear, I am NOT suggesting black folks aren't unnecessarily beaten in prison, frequently and badly. Of course they suffer the batons too, and I've heard some horrific stories for sure. Isn't it just a bit odd, though, that it hasn't yet happened in front of me despite the outsized "black" representation in these cages? My point is that whilst street cop violence against "black" people is radically disproportionate to their population, violence by prison cops apparently is not, and if anything, police violence against "black" people in prison seems to happen disproportionately less often, which is good! I'm no advocate for the equalization of abuse, and I say all of this to ask you: Doesn't this anomaly seem to reveal something really unexpected about the relationship between "race" and police brutality?

Assuming my impressions reflect reality, what could explain the egalitarian ethos of presumably racist cops in a place where violence is completely normalized? Once again, I nominate tribalism. If we think of "whiteness" not as a property of one's skin but as a social condition of opportunity and status, then we may recognize that the color of bodies is but a historical heuristic for treatment by power, and inside prisons, there's no need for skin-based assumptions about who should be treated as valuable. The "good guys", those respectable citizens who count, are starkly distinguished from the "bad guys", the disposable, interchangeable criminals, by their clothing as well as the fact that the former go home each day while the latter never leave the premises and sleep in cages. In the prison environment, cops can immediately identify their tribesmen, so the way they act towards EVERYONE else -- which is badly -- reveals a lot about their basic psychology... or psychopathy, as it were.

During a recent conversation about my time in these dungeons, a friend reminded me that the prison experience is, of course, skewed. No question about that, and it's true that most observations from here are not generalizable, but in this one respect I think prisons may have something valuable to teach us about broader societal conditions, if only we are willing to think honestly about the simple facts. Cops on the inside are probably no different from cops on the outside, and if they act more violently (they do), it is just because they do their copping in a place where violence is more expected, more accepted, and more protected than real life. More to the point, since prison pigs aren't burdened with applying an insulating presumption of "whiteness" to any of their potential victims, regardless of skin color, the way that real world police generally must do because they unleash the fists and sticks and dogs and guns, perhaps we are able to discern a truer, more unvarnished version of genuine cop-think. The ugly fact is, behind the bars and razor wire, prisoners really are racially equal from the punishers' perspective: "criminals" of every hue are nothing more than "worthless niggers" to those who view the world through their blue-tinted wrap-around sunglasses. Should we assume the ones on the other side of the wall really see things so much differently?

From where I sit, if the lens of racism serves to focus more attention on the problems of coppism, excellent, but let's be wary of reducing deeply-seated police pathology to a mere prejudice problem, which can lead us to settle for impotent reforms that aim for "equality" and injury reduction instead of at the ultimate elimination of a universal menace.

***

You can write me directly!
(But please still leave a comment anyway. [smiling emoji])

Dymitri Haraszewski
AC2622 E-Yard
P.O. Box 409020
Ione, CA 95640

* If you leave a comment, I will reply! But please expect it to take a few weeks with the long mail delays. Sorry!

Favorite

Replies (9) Replies feed

tenzintenzin Posted 11 months, 3 weeks ago. ✓ Mailed 11 months, 1 week ago   Favorite
Most people in protective custody are white. White sex offenders and child predators like yourself. That would explain why you have “never seen a black inmate beaten up”. What a stupid comment to make. Black men are beaten, stabbed and murdered in the USA state and federal penitentiary’s every day. I lost a person I loved to murder in a state prison. Knifed to death in the neck. He was black.
There’s no such thing as Coppism. You just are a person who is anti police because they caught you. That’s your gripe.
You keep writing posts showing your ire. You got caught with a child in your car. With a book describ8ng how to give blow jobs. You are a child predator.
I got you want to be some half assed social justice warrior. But they only way you can be a useful person to society is to come clean about your serval predilections to assault children and to be clear and clarify how we can stop predators like yourself,
I’m serious.
How do we stop men like you?
How do we protect children from men like you?
There’s some great universities in your state, Berkeley, USC, and others. Write to their criminology psychology department and take part in a study of paedophiles. Be honest, help humanity tell us how you tick, and how we can protect our children.
This will be my last response to your posts, they make me very angry. And I’m sure you will write other improper and misguided stuff in the future that BTB will allow. So you won’t hear from me again.
But I am serious.
You have the ability to actually do something constructive if you are honest and candid. Can you be?
Tenzin

Guy123456789 Posted 11 months, 1 week ago. ✓ Mailed 11 months, 1 week ago   Favorite
@Tenzin, Have you given any consideration at all to the possibility that he is being honest and candid?

What makes you so sure he is what you heard about him (from where I'm not sure) and that he is not the person in these posts?

Dymitri Haraszewski Posted 6 months, 2 weeks ago.   Favorite
(scanned reply – view as blog post)

tenzintenzin Posted 6 months, 1 week ago. ✓ Mailed 5 months, 3 weeks ago   Favorite
Hubert.

Re: The last paragraph of your letter.
You wrote: “ I need to get back to work, collecting statements in memorium for people who knew ‘Whispers’. So far despite enthusiasm to talk about him, getting anyone to put it on paper is like herding cats. ‘

Again using this man’s untimely death as fodder for your narcissistic ramblings.
Your ‘epitaph’ to him was insulting. Horribly insulting.
You insulted this man in his death and inappropriately in the manner of it.
You cooed and squirmed with delight at the manner I took offence to this. Even trying to compare yourself to Oscar Wilde and other famous wits?
You are none of these people. And you never will be.
Here’s a tip, from someone who writes for a living. In an ‘epitaph’ YOU NEVER INSULT THE DECEASED.

THIS MAN HAS FIVE CHILDREN,HE HAS FAMILY AND FRIENDS WHO READ THIS AND OTHERS BLOGS. FOUR CHILDREN NOW WHO HAVE LOST A FATHER. THEY WILL PROBABLY REREAD HIS BLOGS OVER THE YEARS, HIS GRANDKIDS TOO. PROBABLY HIS GREAT GRANDKID KIDS IF BTB EXIST IN THE FUTURE.

And they will read your ‘epitaph’, your spiteful, toxic, bitchy, poisonous laced diatribe of someone you once spent time with in jail. Maybe he didn’t like you. But hey, when he’s dead, you get to knock him , because you didn’t have the guts to do it when he was alive. And you did knock him didn’t you? Gave his character a good slap, slapped his efforts too, put him on the ground so anyone following his blog could see some conflated person you lied about, just in case they liked him, or thought what he wrote was good. Did you read Father John’s response to you? No, you haven’t have you? Get one of your friends to forward that. You screwed up Hubert. In a very nasty way.
Save your ire for the cops you caught you. Leave people alone. Especially those who grieve. Leave his remaining children, friends and families, memory of their dad and friend alone.
Better still, remove the ‘epitaph’. Leave his memory alone, it doesn’t belong to you.
Tenzin

jonnysmither Posted 5 months, 3 weeks ago. ✓ Mailed 5 months, 3 weeks ago   Favorite
the gaslighting and flip-the-scriptology on here are profoundly apparent...all done to in some way reward bad behavior by convicted criminals..."whaaa i'm a victim of this and that..." that's all that's on here...i catch one of you or your kind around here i got my gauge to do my talking...

Dymitri Haraszewski Posted 4 months, 1 week ago.   Favorite
(scanned reply – view as blog post)

Dymitri Haraszewski Posted 4 months, 1 week ago.   Favorite
(scanned reply – view as blog post)

jonnysmither Posted 2 months, 2 weeks ago. ✓ Mailed 2 weeks, 5 days ago   Favorite
blah blah blah sure got a reaction outta this knucklehead...the simple length of your hissyfit tells me everything...if/when you get outta the joint and you hold down a regular job and not commit crimes...that would impress the hell outta me...not that you impressing me is any priority for you...try staying out of prison and holding down a job to impress yourself

Andromeda Posted 1 month, 4 weeks ago. ✓ Mailed 2 weeks, 5 days ago   Favorite
Dear Dymitri,

I would like to let you know that I have just transcribed your blog article, "The Presumption of Whiteness", as I note this has been without a transcription for a long period of time.

I must make it very clear that I absolutely do not support nor condone the opinions expressed in this blog article whatsoever. I have worked as a neutral transcriber to accurately relay your article, as your written experience should be part of the social record. I have done my best to relay your views accurately, even if I may disagree with both their sentiment and nature. I am a believer in voices being heard, irrespective of my personal opinion.

I would of course take issue with a number of your statements given the enormous burden of evidence indicating that Black and other ethnic minority individuals are many times more likely to suffer violence from all causes (including within policing or penal systems) throughout both North America and Europe. This has been documented by many peer-reviewed studies and is far beyond a subject of debate. Nevertheless, your attention to penal and law enforcement violence as a systemic problem is a valuable and worthy topic of discussion.

Kind regards, Andromeda

We will print and mail your reply by . Guidelines

Other posts by this author

Subscribe

Get notifications when new letters or replies are posted!

Posts by Dymitri Haraszewski: RSS email me
Comments on “The Presumption Of Whiteness”: RSS email me
Featured posts: RSS email me
All Between the Bars posts: RSS