Recent Comments

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 11 years, 3 months ago.   Favorite
security reasons shown from his multiple and continued violent outbursts and threats. (Docket 36, ¶
14.) These cell modifications included preemptive removal of items to prevent Riker from using
them as weapons against people or to damage property. (Id.) In addition to the removal of items
from his cell, Riker would be allowed to be out of his cell only with the Correctional Emergency
Response Team (“CERT”) standing by for showering and phone use, (Docket No. 36, ¶ 15), during
which time his cell would be cleaned and searched, (Docket No. 36, ¶ 16). The staff also determined
that Riker would not be allowed in the dayroom without leg irons and belly chains, and made
special security measures for transporting him to and from the courthouse. (Docket No. 36, ¶¶ 17-
18.) Riker claims that the belly chains and leg irons caused him severe physical injuries due to the
way he had to position his body to use the phone and the mental strain of administrative segregation
and limited recreation time caused severe mental and psychological injury. (Docket No. 1.)
Following these security measures, Riker again on January 12, 2010 tampered with a
sprinkler head but was stopped and secured to a body board when he threatened to disarm a guard
carrying a taser. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 19.) On January 22, 2010, he was transferred to a cell on “2D”,
where he remained for the rest of his time at the Racine County Jail. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 20.) Once in
2D, due to Riker’s prior threats, acts of violence, and repeated property damage, it was determined
that Riker would be allowed out of his cell on only Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays during first

Posted on Interview Of An Innocent Man by Nathaniel Lindell Interview Of An Innocent Man
whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 11 years, 3 months ago.   Favorite
On January 6, 2010, Riker forced his solid cell door open by kicking the door with such
force that the welds broke, and was then able to push the lower portion from its track, allowing him
to exit the cell. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 12.) After exiting the cell, Riker used a metal electrical junction
box he pried from the wall to break six cell windows, two day room windows, and nine light
fixtures, depriving the jail of the use of eight cells for approximately one month. (Id.) That same
day, command staff met to formulate an action plan for safely housing Riker to prevent further
damage to the facility but in a manner in which he would not be able to carry out his threats.
(Docket 36, ¶ 13.) At the meeting, the command staff decided Riker needed to be housed by himself
in a modified cell and two man day room on administrative segregation status for safety and

Posted on Interview Of An Innocent Man by Nathaniel Lindell Interview Of An Innocent Man
whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 11 years, 3 months ago.   Favorite
phone, and exercise in the day room. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 5.) On November 28, 2009, Riker filed an
inmate request/complaint demanding to be placed in general population, to which Sheriff Thompson
responded and advised Riker that his classification was to ensure jail security and safety and his
classification would be reviewed every ten days. (Docket No. 36, ¶¶ 6-7.)
On December 20, 2009, Riker flooded his cell and broke the seat off his desk, then pounded
the heavy metal seat against the cell door, causing jail staff to transfer him to a different cell.
(Docket No. 36, ¶ 8.) On December 29, 2009, during a meeting with a mental health worker, Riker
broke a cell door and shouted racial slurs, which were directed at other inmates. (Docket No. 36, ¶
9.) On December 31, 2009, Riker was yelling at inmates from day rooms 2 and 3, and Officer
Hernandez advised Riker to stand down. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 10.) Riker refused to stand down and
yelled to “get those niggers away from the windows” and asked Officer Hernandez for “any nigger
to kill.” (Id.) Riker also threatened to kick Officer Hernandez’s “ass.” (Id.) On January 2, 2010,
Riker threatened staff members standing guard during his shower, specifically telling Sergeant
Gonzales that “I’m gonna catch you when you don’t have five people around you. I’m gonna
remember your face you fucking spic, and you’re gonna remember mine.” (Docket No. 36, ¶ 11.)

Posted on Interview Of An Innocent Man by Nathaniel Lindell Interview Of An Innocent Man
whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 11 years, 3 months ago.   Favorite
According to the defendants’ submissions in support of summary judgment, which Riker has
failed to appropriately contest, Riker was booked in to the Racine County Jail on November 11,
2009, being held on numerous felony charges including multiple counts of First Degree Recklessly
Endangering Safety, Possession of a Firearm by a Felon, Strangulation and Suffocation, Child
Abuse—Causing Mental Harm, and Child Abuse—Intentionally Causing Harm. (Docket No. 36,
¶1-2.) While awaiting trial, Racine County Jail staff initially housed Riker in administrative
segregation due to the potential safety and security threat he posed within the jail. (Docket No. 36, ¶
3.) The Racine County Jail policy regarding administrative segregation provides that the decision to
place someone in segregation can be based on purely subjective evaluations and predictions of
future behavior or on informed predictions based on past behavior. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 25.)
Segregation is designed to help protect those threatened by the behavior of the inmate as well to
protect the inmate himself. (Id.) An inmate who displays or threatens aggressive behavior towards
staff or other inmates or has any sort of disciplinary problem may need administrative segregation.
(Id.)
Internal investigation revealed that Riker subscribed to a white supremacist ideology, the
expression of which could pose a threat to the safety of other inmates, jail staff, or Riker himself
due to the ethnic and racial diversity of the general population. (Id ¶ 3.) Riker’s assignment to
administrative segregation was done as a precautionary measure, pursuant to jail policy, in an effort
to maintain the safety and security of the jail environment. (Docket No. 36, ¶ 4.) Inmates in
administrative segregation are allowed to have one hour per day outside their cell to shower, use the

Posted on Interview Of An Innocent Man by Nathaniel Lindell Interview Of An Innocent Man
whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 11 years, 3 months ago.   Favorite
Remember Sean, the letter that you had Angel write to child protective services in Colorado stating that she would take your children and raise them when their mother went to prison. How nice of her. Well their mother never did go to prison, something you've been saying will happen anyday for, well for the last three years. And now that Angel killed herself according to you your own children would have been motherless had that unstable woman ever had the chance to take them. Women who kill themselves over men they have prison-only relationships with are crazy. And this is the woman you wanted to take your children in because she was better able to parent the children. How'd that work out for you?

Posted on Interview Of An Innocent Man by Nathaniel Lindell Interview Of An Innocent Man
whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 11 years, 3 months ago.   Favorite
wrongfully convicted
On June 3, 1999 Federal prisoner David Stone was fatally stabbed on the main yard of the U.S. Penitentiary in Florence, Colorado. In August 2005, imprisoned civil rights activist Mark Jordan was wrongfully convicted of the murder after trial court excluded evidence that another prisoner and jailhouse snitch, Sean Riker (aka "joker"), actually committed the offense. See United States v Jordan, 485 F .3d 1214 (10th cir 2007). The Jordan center is offering a ten thousand dollar rewards for information that will clear Jordan's name. We are asking anyone with information regarding this case and Mr. Jordan's innocence to write:
Donald Bounds
Attorney at Law
1994 Lincoln Ave.
Parker, Coloardo 80134

Posted on Interview Of An Innocent Man by Nathaniel Lindell Interview Of An Innocent Man
whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 11 years, 3 months ago.   Favorite
Where is Sean Riker? Why haven't [government authorities] brought him in? Mr. Collins says Sean Riker was at the table at the time of the stabbing. Mr. Collins says in one of his statements that Mr. Riker actually provided the weapon.

57
I wonder whose DNA is on that handle? Any guess?

58
Vol. XVII, at 953-954.

59
Jordan's defense counsel then goes further to implicate Mr. Riker in the crime.

60
We don't have the abilities [government authorities] have. We can't go listen to phone calls that are made by Mr. Riker or some inmate by the name of Larry or Mr. Collins to see if he has been calling anybody about this. We don't have the ability to search their cells. We don't have the ability to search DNA databases to see if Mr. Riker or other people's DNA is on the weapon.

https://bulk.resource.org/courts.gov/c/F3/485/485.F3d.1214.06-1161.html

Posted on Interview Of An Innocent Man by Nathaniel Lindell Interview Of An Innocent Man
whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 11 years, 3 months ago.   Favorite
Admitted Evidence

28
First, both video and testimonial evidence placed Riker at the scene of the stabbing. The video shows Stone, Jordan, Riker and an inmate identified only as "Larry" sitting together at a concrete table several minutes before the stabbing. And Collins testified that he saw Riker and Larry seated at Stone's table prior to the stabbing.

29
Second, Collins claimed to have heard through the prison grapevine, albeit after the stabbing, that Riker had given Jordan the shank to "hit" Stone. Vol. XIV, at 371.

30
Finally, Jordan argues that unidentifiable DNA found on the shank indicates that someone else possessed the shank.

Proffered Evidence

31
The second source of supporting evidence — and the heart of this appeal — are four additional pieces of proffered evidence that Jordan claims would point the finger at Riker.

32
First, Jordan proffered evidence that, six months before the murder, Riker possessed a shank, "almost identical in size and shape" to the shank that killed Stone. Vol. XVI, at 739.

33
Second, Jordan offered statements by Riker to investigators after the stabbing indicating that he was untruthful about the circumstances surrounding Stone's death. Jordan contends that these lies reflect a "consciousness of guilt" on the part of Riker. Id. at 734.

34
Third, the defense claimed evidence shows that shortly after the stabbing prison officials investigated Riker as a possible suspect in Stone's homicide. Id. at 736. The record unfortunately does not disclose the basis for this statement.

35
Finally, Jordan claimed that Riker would testify that he and other inmates went over to a set of bleachers after the stabbing. On the top of the bleachers, investigators later found a blood-stained glove. Id. at 737.

Posted on Interview Of An Innocent Man by Nathaniel Lindell Interview Of An Innocent Man
Voice12 Posted 11 years, 3 months ago.   Favorite
Joy to the world Russ! Thanks for the reminder of how much there is to be joyful about. God bless :)

Posted on All Is Well by Robert Russell All Is Well
sweetpea01 Posted 11 years, 3 months ago.   Favorite
continued...I just want to see REAL proof of the things Sean is accused of if all this stuff is true. Most of all I just hope the kids are safe and I truly hope that all these things did not happen to them but if it did happen I hope they are able to overcome and heal from all this somehow. All this shit that I keep seeing on here is absolutely fucking crazy! If you guys really care about those kids then stop this shit. I am sure they are embarrassed enough knowing that the whole world knows about what happened to them and after all this time you are still on here posting all kinds of shit that I am sure those kids do not want everyone to see. Especially if they are trying to move on with their lives and heal from this crap. And if Sean really did do all the things you say he did then he does deserve whatever he gets but if you have lied about the whole thing and caused an innocent man to go to prison then you deserve worse. There is nothing worse than someone who would hurt a child in any way shape or form other than someone who lies about it actually happening. But I will admit with all the things I have read about Sean's past it does make me question some things but then again with what I have heard about and read on Tayler leaves me to question some things as well. For example why did she wait so long to turn Sean in and why didn't she do more to protect the kids IF Sean really did do the things he is accused of doing?? Why did Tayler write to him and send pictures of the kids to him after she had him locked up?? Why did you take pictures of the kids with Sean's father (the one you say has a child porn addiction) if he really is that way?? Just alot of things don't make sense on here. And I am not the only person asking these questions. Sometimes I wonder if you guys just like drama or what. All I can say is the kids deserve better and I hope they are able to go on and have some sort of a decent life after all this. Put up some REAL proof that all these things did happen. NOT stuff about his past or any of this he said she said crap.

Posted on Interview Of An Innocent Man by Nathaniel Lindell Interview Of An Innocent Man
More comments:

Subscribe

Get notifications when new letters or replies are posted!

Featured posts: RSS email me
All Between the Bars posts: RSS