Recent Comments

whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 12 years, 8 months ago.   Favorite
You’re a nice guy Sean. You’re not racist, you don’t hurt people. You don’t commit property crimes and crimes against persons. You love children and your own previous record of being an involved father to your own children is solid. You treat women with respect. The whole “no mercy” policy was just a joke. You treated people in prison with respect and you never checked in or snitched to get freedom. You don’t lie about anything at all. It’s ok to have women write hate mail to your ex-wife and write lies about her to judges, social services and online. It’s okay that a woman killed herself for you and left with son with no mother. But you’re getting out soon! So soon you think you might explode, and you’re looking for love again. No matter that every woman who has had experience with you was ruined. Christina raised her boys on her own, no help from you. Paula spent 3 years in prison for being with you during the bombings and certainly she wasn’t the mastermind. Your ex-wife suffered years of abuse to her and her children. Angel killed herself. You are a caner on society Sean Riker. A cancer with no cure. I feel sorry for the taxpayers of Wisconsin for having to pay the bill to house and feed you.

Posted on Interview Of An Innocent Man by Nathaniel Lindell Interview Of An Innocent Man
whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 12 years, 8 months ago.   Favorite
Sean said on Nathan’s blog titled “Moderating the Sean Riker debate” that “I’m Sean Riker and everything I say is true”
But it just isn’t true Sean. I have proved over and over again that you’re a liar.
You claim to be a good guy vs. the court paperwork that says you’re a federal prison snitch who was in protective custody because you were worried for your own safety. You checked in Sean and we all know it.
You say you’re not racist but the paperwork I posted shows you asked for “any nigger to kill” as well as demanding jail staff not house black men near your cells and calling a Hispanic jail guard a “spic”.
You claim you’re getting out on your prisoninmates.com site vs. me showing that clearly you’re not thanks to the appellate court upholding the 7 ½ years.
You said you got a letter from your child vs. nobody actually get a letter and me talking to four of the agencies you said you sent the letter to and the Attorney General’s own letter back to you mentioning only YOUR letter.
You claiming I’m going to prison vs. Well, I haven’t yet so that is rather obvious.
Saying I’m unstable vs. your fiancé killing herself over you and you being on psychotropic drugs.
You claiming DNA evidence will exonerate you vs. you saying everywhere else that only my lies convicted you. And then Nathan saying the DNA mixup was just a white lie at most.
Your desperate housewives and Nathan can go around on the merry-go-round of excuses and lies all they want.
You went to federal prison for burglaries, arson and bombings. Including an elementary school. And you lied about the motive because it was to cover up a robbery from your meth-induced crime spree. Not because of Mormons having sex with kids. But they excuse that.
You were in a prison gang and involved in a murder where a man has spent almost 15 years now proclaiming his own innocence. But Mark Jordan is also just a liar and this is all excused too.
You committed crimes during the entire time you lived in Utah. Excused.
You admit you were never out of trouble or prison for more than four years from the age of 13 until now. No biggie, it’s excused too.
You have a swastika tattoo and you refer to black people almost solely as niggers. You ask to kill them and tell guards they are spics and you will remember their face and get them when they are not around five other guards. But you say you’re not a racist. We believe you, excused.

Posted on Interview Of An Innocent Man by Nathaniel Lindell Interview Of An Innocent Man
admin Posted 12 years, 8 months ago.   Favorite
The preceding comment was removed for violation of our community guidelines: http://betweenthebars.org/about/guidelines/. Repeated violations of our community guidelines are grounds for removal from the site. For more information about why this comment was removed please contact us info@betweenthebars.org.

Posted on Interview Of An Innocent Man by Nathaniel Lindell Interview Of An Innocent Man
whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 12 years, 8 months ago.   Favorite
[deleted]

Posted on Interview Of An Innocent Man by Nathaniel Lindell Interview Of An Innocent Man
whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 12 years, 8 months ago.   Favorite
And now I’ve got Nathan Lindell, a convicted murderer of his elderly coin-collecting neighbor, arsonist and thief calling me a liar because he’s studied “kinetics” while in prison and based on that expert knowledge of his he believes Sean’s body language is telling the truth. How fucking ridiculous. A convicted murderer accusing me of lying about my own marriage. Nathan and Sean can’t even get it straight if Sean has a tv in his cell or not. Nathan claims Sean’s too poor for a tv, yet Sean claims he watches tv, works out and corresponds with hundreds of followers during the day. Only people like you sweetpea and people like Megan who can’t spell or write worth a shit believe this stuff. Sean and Nathan prey on women like you two. Women who are bored and lonely, maybe not fulfilled in their own life, think they are doing some great detective work and making a difference in all the injustice of the world. You care so much about my kids. Please don’t, they’re fine. Care about the kids that still live with people like Sean Riker. Or the kids whose parents couldn’t afford Christmas presents because Sean Riker stole their father’s Christmas bonus check from his job. Or the kids in Mark Jordan’s life that lost a family member because Sean pinned Mark for a murder Sean did himself. Are you as worried about Angel’s son who now has no mother at all because of her relationship and interaction with Sean? That poor boy lost a mother to suicide. My kids have a strong mother, a mother that is still alive. A mother that doesn’t allow delusions to control her life and spend more time worrying about a man in prison than her own child. Yes sweetpea, my children are just fine.

Posted on Interview Of An Innocent Man by Nathaniel Lindell Interview Of An Innocent Man
whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 12 years, 8 months ago.   Favorite
Their mother, Christina, never took the kids to visit Sean while he was incarcerated. And she didn’t give him the letters he wrote. And she did the right thing. It was better to move away from Sean and let the boys have a normal childhood. But why, if Sean was so great then as you claim he is now, did Christina leave him. Why would she leave that marital bliss and for such The other daughter you claim is his probably isn’t. Sean said this girl had a bad mother who was addicted to drugs and she had no good family. She wanted a father so much so she reached out to Sean for what was missing in her life. Once Sean got out of federal prison he wanted nothing to do with her. He said she was mentally unstable. (Who knows if that’s true or not) He slept with her mother a few times. I doubt he is biologically her father. And he certainly isn’t a father role for her. He was locked up during her entire childhood and teen years and he never once visited her after being released in 2006. Not once. Sean has had no time to be around children during his life to show one way or another on how he acts around kids. And I made the mistake of my and my children’s life by giving him a chance. He destroyed my children and treated us as if we were in prison with him and he gave us the “no mercy” policy he mentions above in his “Wisconsin Inmates are an Enigma to Me” post. Do you think it’s reasonable for me to post pictures of my minor children with abuse on them on the internet to fill your obsessive and somewhat weird sense of need? Do you think that is appropriate? You do realize that the jurors saw this evidence don’t you? There was five days of trial testimony, five days. I testified for two hours. The kids testified in addition to the videos and other misc. things for one day. That leaves 3 ½ days of testimony that was not related to me “lying” on the stand or the kids.

Posted on Interview Of An Innocent Man by Nathaniel Lindell Interview Of An Innocent Man
whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 12 years, 8 months ago.   Favorite
Sweetpea: I have been called names, told I’m sadistic, a liar, a bad mother, had women want to get their hands on me and make threats against me. All women I don’t know. All women who have hate for me based on the bullshit Sean feeds them. Women have written to child services in my county offering to take my children from me when I go to prison because Sean has convinced them I am going to prison. This has become such an issue with the possibility of these crazy women trying to kidnap my children that I moved on the county’s dime to get out of this area so that I am safe and my kids are safe. And it burns Sean up so much. Trying to force me to give out my new address and trying to take me to court to demand it or have me sanctioned. Sean got kicked off the case here because he lies, twists things around and is a malicious jerk in all aspects of anything he is involved in. So all these things Sean says about me are untrue but I don’t threaten to kill judges or prosecutors, I don’t damage state property, I don’t make racial insults towards other people and I don’t have to be wheeled into court like Hannibal Lector. I know this stuff about me isn’t true but I go to work, take care of my kids, go to court and do all the other things in a normal life plus deal with the misery of the whole “Sean situation” without doing any of those things. Are you really giving Sean a pass on threatening to kill a judge and acting how he did in jail because he says he was wrongfully accused? So it’s okay for me to threaten people, beat people up, damage property and threaten judges and it’s all okay because Sean says things about me that aren’t true. And Sean’s past can’t be used against him because it has nothing to do with our case. Yes, it does. Sean admits in his own words he was in youth authority since age 13. Before 2006 he had never been out of prison for more than four years by his own account. And during those four years he was committing felonies. Back in prison in 1995 for another decade and released again in 2006. During the 06-09 years he was committing felonies as well. There’s no period of Sean being good to try to counter this. His whole life has been in prison or on the streets for a stretch while he committed more crimes. Your uncle was violent but not towards women and children. Good for him. But he’s not Sean. They are different men. Some similarities, some differences. I also believe that some men can be violent and dangerous and yet not hurt their family. Even though my own experience should tell me otherwise I still choose to believe that. But Sean isn’t one of those men. He does hurt women. He beat Paula, the woman who did the bombing with him. He beat me and beat my kids. Sean has no time in his life that he was around kids. His kids were in diapers when he and Paula were in a meth-induced bombing spree in Utah. Those kids never saw Sean for 15 years. No contact through the mail.

Posted on Interview Of An Innocent Man by Nathaniel Lindell Interview Of An Innocent Man
whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 12 years, 8 months ago.   Favorite
Here I will provide evidence of Sean being racist.
“According to the criminal complaint, Riker slipped out of his belly chain as he was being moved from his cell to the shower area of the jail on July 29. The 2-foot long section of chain had a padlock on it, and was still attached to handcuffs on his wrists.”
“Staff at the jail said Riker screamed about his treatment in the jail and used racial slurs while telling staff to stop putting black men in cells near him. He allegedly swung the chain, cracking a day room window. After re reportedly agreed to return to his cell, staff said Riker turned and ran to the corner cell in front of a day room occupied by two black inmates. He then allegedly swung the chain and padlock at the window several times, causing it to crack.”
“Staff said Riker then quickly returned to his cell and said “There. Now they can’t come out ‘cause their window’s broken.” “ Above three paragraphs available here http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/wisconsin/wiedce/2:2010cv00906/54450/46/?1342279871
RACINE- The man who allegedly broke out of his jail cell and trashed a day room has pleaded not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect.”
SO SEAN IS ADMITTING HE HAS A MENTAL DISEASE OR DEFECT. “Defense attorney Robert Peterson told the court Friday that his client had been on psychotropic drugs before his arrest, and that the jail did not keep giving him the medication. The judge asked if Riker intended to enter the same type of plea in his other case – for the alleged abuse of his family; Peterson said he did not believe so.”
The same Peterson attorney that you didn’t like for whatever reason and then made up the claim that he sexually molested you so that you could have him removed from your case. You asked for him to be removed, the judge refused, and then you said he sexually molested you so you’d get your way and he’d be off the case. And Sean’s admitting that he has a mental disease or defect here in this case. That was his official plea. No making stuff up or inflammatory bullshit from me. Sean pled that himself. So does Sean have a mental disease or defect or is he manipulating the system and crying wolf. But he says he was on psychotropic drugs. Guess what? They don’t give psychotropic drugs to mentally stable people. I have never been on meds once in my life for any mental illness. And after taking a mental health evaluation it was determined that I was mentally healthy and not asked to take any therapy or get on any meds. My brain works Sean. Yours apparently doesn’t. So quit saying someone who has been professionally deemed mentally stable is not at the same time you’re claiming you’re innocent by reason of mental disease or defect because you weren’t being administered your psychotropic drugs.

Posted on Interview Of An Innocent Man by Nathaniel Lindell Interview Of An Innocent Man
whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 12 years, 8 months ago.   Favorite
“We conclude that there are no issues with arguable merit for appearl,” the judges wrote in the eight-page opinion.
The opinion, obtained Friday afternoon by The Journal Times, says that Riker’s account couldn’t be confirmed by his attorney or the appellate court. (SO WEIRD HOW LIKE NOTHING SEAN SAYS CAN BE CONFIRMED)
“Appellate counsel indicates that she investigated the matter and found nothing to corroborate Riker’s claim of a biohazard attack” that day, the judges wrote.
Riker – an alleged member of the Aryan Brotherhood – contended that because of his opinion about minorities, he was the target of “rampant and ongoing” abuse from other inmates. (WHAT OPINIONS ABOUT MINORITIES COULD THAT BE SEAN. POSITIVE OPINIONS OF MINORITIES? NAH, IT’S NEGATIVE OPINIONS OF MINORITIES WHICH MAKES YOU AN ADMITTED RACIST)
Riker remains in the Wisconsin Secure Program Facility in Boscobel. He sought late last year to have his conviction in this case overturned.
Appellate court records show the judges also decided Riker’s defense attorney, Urszula Tempska, no long has to represent him. (GUESS SHE’S NOT ON YOUR LEGAL TEAM, LOL)
Riker was sentenced Dec. 22, 2010, by Racine County Circuit Judge Wayne Marik to 7 ½ years in prison and five years on extended supervision for damaging the jail. Marik also ordered Riker, 44, to repay $5,443.79 in damages.
Marik convicted Riker on Nov. 4, 2010 , of two felony and two misdemeanor charges: criminal damage to property and escape, and criminal damage to property and disorderly conduct, respectively.
But Riker won’t be released from the stat’s Maximum security prison when that term ends. In a separate case, Riker was sentenced on March 2 of this year to 200 years behind bars for beating his wife and two stepdaughters, molesting the girls and terrorizing this family in their Wind Lake home.
Jurors convicted Riker on Nov. 11, 2011, of the 16 charges. The family moved to their Wind Lake rental home after Riker was released from federal prison, where he served time for a series of bombing in 1995 in Utah.
Article available here http://www.journaltimes.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/appeals-court-affirms-conviction-in-jail-damage-spree/article_f3d121d6-1a44-11e2-b004-001a4bcf887a.html

Posted on Interview Of An Innocent Man by Nathaniel Lindell Interview Of An Innocent Man
whoeveryouwantmetobe Posted 12 years, 8 months ago.   Favorite
Speaking of the article about the court of appeals affirming Sean’s 7 ½ sentence why did Sean write on his PrisonInmates.com personal site that he’s getting out. Here’s a directly quoted bit of fun from that:
“Great News!!! I’ve been serving a 200 years for crimes I’m 100% innocent of. I was prosecuted, persecuted and vilifies for the worst crimes imaginable. (spelling errors consistent with the page, not mine) Though newly obtained DNA evidence that proves my innocence and the recantation of the star “witness” I will be set free. I have no idea how long until I get out. The filling of the motions and the waiting period in the courts could take a while. BUT I’m GETTING OUT!!! My legal team has already been contacts regarding a settlement for my wrongful conviction. I will be on easy street at the end of this order. I’m so excited I could explode.”
Here’s the article from The Racine Journal Times:
Appeals court affirms conviction in jail damage spree October 20, 2012
RACINE- A state appellate court decision this week upheld an almost 2-year-old Racine County conviction against a man for damaging the Racine County Jail when he broke out of his cell and went on a rampage.
The three-judge panel issued its decision on Wednesday, affirming former Wind Lake resident Sean A. Riker’s November 2010 conviction for busting up the jail. He broke out of his cell in a 24-hour lockdown segregation unit on Jan. 6, 2010 by repeatedly pounding on the door until it became dislodged.
According to an appellate court filling, Riker contended that an inmate threw fermented feces mingled with urine at the base of his cell door that morning. He said the mixture splashed him in the face and mouth and argued he had to break out of his cell because he didn’t have access to towels, water or a shower. (SPLASHED YOU IN THE MOUTH, WERE YOU GIVING THE BOTTOM OF THE DOOR A KISS WHEN THE ALLEGED FECES CAME AT THE DOOR. THIS IS THE MOST RIDICULOUS CRAP EVER, PARDON THE PUN. YOU MUST LIKE FECES SEAN SINCE FECES WAS THE OBJECT OF CHOICE YOU ACCUSED ME OF SMEARING OVER FAMILY PHOTOS.)

Posted on Interview Of An Innocent Man by Nathaniel Lindell Interview Of An Innocent Man
More comments:

Subscribe

Get notifications when new letters or replies are posted!

Featured posts: RSS email me
All Between the Bars posts: RSS