I have to agree on every point you made about repealing DADT. I don't understand LGBT groups that spent so much capital on the issue. Typically, these groups are to the left, so why should they want to fight in the oil wars? I guess it is due to the bi-partisan acceptance of the "Support the Troops" charade.
In regards to the Tea Party, they are full of shit. All they are a bunch of old racist, neo-conservative, liars. They don't care that their taxes are too high, they care that Blacks and Latinos are recieving social benefits. Nevermind that the defense budget is 20% of the national budget, that most of welfare goes to people like them, through tax credits, medicare, and social security. They don't realize that it isn't the underclass ruining the country, it's the burgeoning group of medicare recipients as the country gets older, demographically.
On prostitution, in certain couties of Nevada regulated brothels are legal, and it seems to be safe, productive, and the girls are paid very well. Anti-prostitution legislation is hypocritical. Biologically women provide sex to men for support. Does it matter, that a man buys a woman dinners, gifts, and takes care of her children to obtain sex, or if he simply gives her cash. Both serve the same function.
I'd have to agree with your thoughts on the Royal Wedding. It was the most ridiculous media spectacle I've seen in some time. By what right is this man a prince? I looked at his family tree and out of the thousands of people that can claim direct descendecy from the Patriarch King (I forget his name), this man is only a prince due the arbitrary system of the first son suceeding to the throne. There is no merit involved. The guy looks like an idiot, too.
Also what's the point to learning Esperanto. It will never develop into a world language, as I'm sure English will eventually. So you're already a step ahead of half the world.
I don't understand the criticism of the Catholic Church. It is a religious group whom has the freedom of belief. If the believers of such a group decides that they do not want to give out condoms, why should they? The Bible condemns all sex outside of an appropriate marriage structure, so they are well within scripture. I don't see how condoms would help the Africans anyway. Most of them would not use such a thing, and when you believe raping virgins will cure AIDS, I don't think anything will be effective.
Life on the outside is just as bad, but there are a few things out here that are nice to be able to indulge in. What's your problem with currency? Without it, how would we function, how would we value the worth of a thing? A gift economy at this stage, wouldn't be feasible. A controlled economy is inefficient and everyone suffers. Capitalism creates growth, wealth and raises the standard of living. Nonetheless a social democratic republic would serve the people better, as it provides a safety net, yet does not hinder growth.
I don't know what you think is so great about Miley Cyrus. She's not even that good-looking. She's legal in all great fifty states, so I don't see how anyone is a hypocrite for ogling her.
The Left and the Right are the same thing. The Left is full of shit, and only care if they are in power, then everything is okey-dokey, even if nothing's changed. The Right is pretty honest about their intentions. The thing is their intentions are terrible. Obama can keep engaging the Afghan war, post tens of thousands of soldiers in Iraq, and bomb Libya's ground and air forces, and by what right? Does Libya not have the right to quell rebellion, these "protestors" are rebels.
The North still claims moral superiority in the the US Civil War, when they attacked the South for simply suceeding from the Union. Now what if Britian had decided to support the South, as was the prevailing notion. We would not claim Britian was humanitarian, we would have gone to war with Britian once again.
I don't believe internationally-backed NATO-led bombing of Libya, and the current situation in Iraq count as wars. It's really just one big war, The War on Terrorism. It's foolish to call us a Christian nation. We are a secular nation, whose very existence and wealth requires force to preserve the globalist economy. Not that I think that is right, but it's the reality of things. Any politician that claims that God has anything to do with it, is lying through his teeth.
On prostitution, in certain couties of Nevada regulated brothels are legal, and it seems to be safe, productive, and the girls are paid very well. Anti-prostitution legislation is hypocritical. Biologically women provide sex to men for support. Does it matter, that a man buys a woman dinners, gifts, and takes care of her children to obtain sex, or if he simply gives her cash. Both serve the same function.
Also what's the point to learning Esperanto. It will never develop into a world language, as I'm sure English will eventually. So you're already a step ahead of half the world.
The North still claims moral superiority in the the US Civil War, when they attacked the South for simply suceeding from the Union. Now what if Britian had decided to support the South, as was the prevailing notion. We would not claim Britian was humanitarian, we would have gone to war with Britian once again.