I cannot find any story that Ronald Clark discusses his "bride" Josie. If you know of one, please post it. I looked and could not find.
I agree he has the right to comment...but he also has the responsibility to tell the truth. The truth for convict Ronald Clark, Jr lurks deep.
In alot of his posts looking for "soul mates" - Clark intimates his "innocence". He speaks of his death sentence as though it was his only murder conviction. I'm here to tell you IT IS NOT.
Clark murdered (2) people he was convicted of. To read his diary makes me want to *chit*. my family was involved in his first murder. he got the death penalty which was overturned. then he got life without parole. then, of course, he caught the murder rap for which he is on death row.
Ronald Clark, Jr. has been found guilty of two homicides. Personally, I think there are more but that is MY belief.
Anyone who contributes to or entertains his rants might want to consider the others incarcerated who would benefit from our insight and possibly our support.
BTB has alot of inmates who have very actionable cases...whose lives may very well be changed by public demonstration.
Personally, I'm going to assist those who have a chance. To throw good money after bad is not my idea of support. I want to help those who have a chance at life.
As far as I know, Ronnie HAS already written a blogpost about that Josie story. Who´s now telling the truth - him or Josie - is, of course, something I can´t judge.
I agree that in the free world a young man would not have married a woman who is 20 years older than him (at least not because of love). It was probably a little naive of her to obviously believe otherwise.
About circling around the comments left.... well, one may like it or not, like the contents of the answers or not, but I do think he has got the right to answer, just as the commenters have the right to answer his blog entries.
That´s a comment I can fully agree with, SaH. (Especially the tone is somehow different than usually. Sounds more like constructive criticizing than in the past.)
Ronald Clark, you already had "under your belt" one death sentence overturned. Rolled over to life without parole. That was the murder of the fisherman approx 2 years before the demise of Mr. Willis. Life without parole (in the first) and the death sentence in the second doesn't leave alot for a defense attorney to argue or work with.
I'm all for a vigorous defense where applicable. A convicted murderer (not once..but twice) is a stretch by any imagination.
No appeals will ever release you from incarceration due to your convictions. Get over yourself.
Should you escape death, you'll still be facing life without parole. That is what happens when you play god.
Might I suggest you now adapt a kinder, gentler approach to life? Accept your situation for what it is and make the best of it.
Rather than rant and rave - try to minimize the acts that got you there. DO NOT TAKE ADVANTAGE OF PEOPLE (ESPECIALLY WOMEN).
Do your time with some dignity - something you have not shown in the past. Respect them and they will respect you.
I am not a death row inmate with a number instead of a name. I am a person in the free world expressing my opinion. My on-site persona is SAH. You need not know (nor does Clark) my identity. Disclosure of same would put me at risk as evidenced by the prior acts of Clark. Read the posts by "josie clark, his death row bride" and the threats she endured.
Mr Clark chose to use this forum in a very public way (personalized stationary, even - with his photo).
He writes about CYBER BULLYING..yet he has written and posted VOLUMES of text re: former Warden Reddish and his staff. He cites un-charged DUI's, etc of which he has no personal knowledge and which cannot be verified as fact. He has slandered most of the administration. The fact that he is on death row makes holding him accountable a mute point.
I'd like to hear less from Ronald Clark in the future.
RSS
I agree he has the right to comment...but he also has the responsibility to tell the truth. The truth for convict Ronald Clark, Jr lurks deep.
In alot of his posts looking for "soul mates" - Clark intimates his "innocence". He speaks of his death sentence as though it was his only murder conviction. I'm here to tell you IT IS NOT.
Anyone who contributes to or entertains his rants might want to consider the others incarcerated who would benefit from our insight and possibly our support.
BTB has alot of inmates who have very actionable cases...whose lives may very well be changed by public demonstration.
Personally, I'm going to assist those who have a chance. To throw good money after bad is not my idea of support. I want to help those who have a chance at life.
Who´s now telling the truth - him or Josie - is, of course, something I can´t judge.
I agree that in the free world a young man would not have married a woman who is 20 years older than him (at least not because of love).
It was probably a little naive of her to obviously believe otherwise.
About circling around the comments left....
well, one may like it or not, like the contents of the answers or not, but I do think he has got the right to answer, just as the commenters have the right to answer his blog entries.
(Especially the tone is somehow different than usually. Sounds more like constructive criticizing than in the past.)
I'm all for a vigorous defense where applicable. A convicted murderer (not once..but twice) is a stretch by any imagination.
No appeals will ever release you from incarceration due to your convictions. Get over yourself.
Should you escape death, you'll still be facing life without parole. That is what happens when you play god.
Might I suggest you now adapt a kinder, gentler approach to life? Accept your situation for what it is and make the best of it.
Rather than rant and rave - try to minimize the acts that got you there. DO NOT TAKE ADVANTAGE OF PEOPLE (ESPECIALLY WOMEN).
Do your time with some dignity - something you have not shown in the past. Respect them and they will respect you.
Mr Clark chose to use this forum in a very public way (personalized stationary, even - with his photo).
He writes about CYBER BULLYING..yet he has written and posted VOLUMES of text re: former Warden Reddish and his staff. He cites un-charged DUI's, etc of which he has no personal knowledge and which cannot be verified as fact. He has slandered most of the administration. The fact that he is on death row makes holding him accountable a mute point.
I'd like to hear less from Ronald Clark in the future.