This is to let you know that I have just transcribed your blog post, and I hope that I have done a decent job. I wonder if you could confirm whether you wanted the misspelling of "prosecutors" to be left in as spelt, since I note it was spelt correctly elsewhere and appeared to be for ironic effect? I have marked this with [sic]. If you are able to see this, please do let me know if the transcript requires correction.
As a non-binary person, whilst I disagree with some of what you wrote at the beginning of your piece, you are a talented writer with an excellent command of the English language and made some very good points which were made eloquently.
Kind regards, Andromeda
Cjwindowco sent: 12/24/23 Hi Andromeda, this is Dymitri. I just received your 2 comments today (12-21) and wanted you to know I'm sending a proper reply tonight. It probably won't post until mid-to-late January though, so I hope u see this to at least know I read them. Thanks for your transcriptions and kind words!
Hi Andromeda, this is Dymitri. I just received your 2 comments today (12-21) and wanted you to know I'm sending a proper reply tonight. It probably won't post until mid-to-late January though, so I hope u see this to at least know I read them. Thanks for your transcriptions and kind words!
It is somewhat clear that the legislature did not mean for article 10 of the Mental Health Law to include a "no-date" release, especially upon following the rules and guidelines of Marcy, otherwise known as whatever the hell they call themselves now dur to so many lawsuits. Your 4th Amendment rights have been repeatedly violated, your right to Due Process (14 Amendment) is really the governing principle that is permitting all of these violations to occur. When the legislature wrote article 10, they violated your 1st Amendment right due to vagueness and ambiguity. What must be combatted is article 10 in a 1983 proceeding, in addition to explicitly explaining all of the violations of the U.S. Constitution that have been inflicted due to its existence. I have shared your story all over social media. I have work to do today, YEAH TO WHOMEVER IS READING THIS, I AM IN THE FIELD OF LAW (for the officials, not readers), so when I return, I'll jump back on and see what else I can assist you with. Hang in there and DON'T LET THEM WIN!
Hi Xzyzst, just a little note to let you know, I do have a prepaid c-card but now the hang up is registration at gettingout... also, dang, I like letters much more than fone :p "talk" to you soon :) Jules
blah blah blah sure got a reaction outta this knucklehead...the simple length of your hissyfit tells me everything...if/when you get outta the joint and you hold down a regular job and not commit crimes...that would impress the hell outta me...not that you impressing me is any priority for you...try staying out of prison and holding down a job to impress yourself
This is just to let you know that I've transcribed your blog post on the Ashton Kutcher case, which is now the second of yours that I've typed.
Whilst I am admittedly more than uncomfortable about the concepts in some of what you have written, as I have been on the other side of this as a sex abuse victim, I am a strong believer in the idea that everyone should have the right to their voice being heard (within reason) truthfully. It is in this sentiment that I hope I have done a good job of your transcription, and not, I should add, that I am at all endorsing what you have written.
Nevertheless, I did find a number of points that you made were very important and concepts that I could certainly agree with, such as that an entire person's life is not defined by their crime -- or more specifically, that merely because someone has committed a crime does not mean that the positive experiences that others had with them cease to exist.
As with your previous blog, you are an engaging and eloquent writer and I look forward to reading more of your work.
This is to let you know that I have just transcribed your blog post, and I hope that I have done a decent job. I wonder if you could confirm whether you wanted the misspelling of "prosecutors" to be left in as spelt, since I note it was spelt correctly elsewhere and appeared to be for ironic effect? I have marked this with [sic]. If you are able to see this, please do let me know if the transcript requires correction.
As a non-binary person, whilst I disagree with some of what you wrote at the beginning of your piece, you are a talented writer with an excellent command of the English language and made some very good points which were made eloquently.
RSS
This is to let you know that I have just transcribed your blog post, and I hope that I have done a decent job. I wonder if you could confirm whether you wanted the misspelling of "prosecutors" to be left in as spelt, since I note it was spelt correctly elsewhere and appeared to be for ironic effect? I have marked this with [sic]. If you are able to see this, please do let me know if the transcript requires correction.
As a non-binary person, whilst I disagree with some of what you wrote at the beginning of your piece, you are a talented writer with an excellent command of the English language and made some very good points which were made eloquently.
Kind regards, Andromeda
Cjwindowco sent: 12/24/23
Hi Andromeda, this is Dymitri. I just received your 2 comments today (12-21) and wanted you to know I'm sending a proper reply tonight. It probably won't post until mid-to-late January though, so I hope u see this to at least know I read them.
Thanks for your transcriptions and kind words!
Thanks for your transcriptions and kind words!
It is somewhat clear that the legislature did not mean for article 10 of the Mental Health Law to include a "no-date" release, especially upon following the rules and guidelines of Marcy, otherwise known as whatever the hell they call themselves now dur to so many lawsuits. Your 4th Amendment rights have been repeatedly violated, your right to Due Process (14 Amendment) is really the governing principle that is permitting all of these violations to occur. When the legislature wrote article 10, they violated your 1st Amendment right due to vagueness and ambiguity. What must be combatted is article 10 in a 1983 proceeding, in addition to explicitly explaining all of the violations of the U.S. Constitution that have been inflicted due to its existence. I have shared your story all over social media. I have work to do today, YEAH TO WHOMEVER IS READING THIS, I AM IN THE FIELD OF LAW (for the officials, not readers), so when I return, I'll jump back on and see what else I can assist you with. Hang in there and DON'T LET THEM WIN!
just a little note to let you know, I do have a prepaid c-card but now the hang up is registration at gettingout... also, dang, I like letters much more than fone :p
"talk" to you soon :)
Jules
This is just to let you know that I've transcribed your blog post on the Ashton Kutcher case, which is now the second of yours that I've typed.
Whilst I am admittedly more than uncomfortable about the concepts in some of what you have written, as I have been on the other side of this as a sex abuse victim, I am a strong believer in the idea that everyone should have the right to their voice being heard (within reason) truthfully. It is in this sentiment that I hope I have done a good job of your transcription, and not, I should add, that I am at all endorsing what you have written.
Nevertheless, I did find a number of points that you made were very important and concepts that I could certainly agree with, such as that an entire person's life is not defined by their crime -- or more specifically, that merely because someone has committed a crime does not mean that the positive experiences that others had with them cease to exist.
As with your previous blog, you are an engaging and eloquent writer and I look forward to reading more of your work.
Kind regards, Andromeda
This is to let you know that I have just transcribed your blog post, and I hope that I have done a decent job. I wonder if you could confirm whether you wanted the misspelling of "prosecutors" to be left in as spelt, since I note it was spelt correctly elsewhere and appeared to be for ironic effect? I have marked this with [sic]. If you are able to see this, please do let me know if the transcript requires correction.
As a non-binary person, whilst I disagree with some of what you wrote at the beginning of your piece, you are a talented writer with an excellent command of the English language and made some very good points which were made eloquently.
Kind regards, Andromeda