Clark was found guilty of (2) homicides. Both were death cases - the first sentence was overturned and rolled to life without parole. The second homicide (Mr Willis) was a death sentence.
I cannot find any story that Ronald Clark discusses his "bride" Josie. If you know of one, please post it. I looked and could not find.
I agree he has the right to comment...but he also has the responsibility to tell the truth. The truth for convict Ronald Clark, Jr lurks deep.
In alot of his posts looking for "soul mates" - Clark intimates his "innocence". He speaks of his death sentence as though it was his only murder conviction. I'm here to tell you IT IS NOT.
Clark murdered (2) people he was convicted of. To read his diary makes me want to *chit*. my family was involved in his first murder. he got the death penalty which was overturned. then he got life without parole. then, of course, he caught the murder rap for which he is on death row.
Ronald Clark, Jr. has been found guilty of two homicides. Personally, I think there are more but that is MY belief.
Anyone who contributes to or entertains his rants might want to consider the others incarcerated who would benefit from our insight and possibly our support.
BTB has alot of inmates who have very actionable cases...whose lives may very well be changed by public demonstration.
Personally, I'm going to assist those who have a chance. To throw good money after bad is not my idea of support. I want to help those who have a chance at life.
As far as I know, Ronnie HAS already written a blogpost about that Josie story. Who´s now telling the truth - him or Josie - is, of course, something I can´t judge.
I agree that in the free world a young man would not have married a woman who is 20 years older than him (at least not because of love). It was probably a little naive of her to obviously believe otherwise.
About circling around the comments left.... well, one may like it or not, like the contents of the answers or not, but I do think he has got the right to answer, just as the commenters have the right to answer his blog entries.
That´s a comment I can fully agree with, SaH. (Especially the tone is somehow different than usually. Sounds more like constructive criticizing than in the past.)
RSS
I´m referring to the blog entry "Bad information", written on October 16, 2012.
At the moment, it´s on page 8 (at least on my computer).
As I said....
I can´t judge who´s telling the truth, Ronnie or his ex, but in that entry, he did write something about that story.
His crimes FAR surpass those for which he has been charged and convicted.
I agree he has the right to comment...but he also has the responsibility to tell the truth. The truth for convict Ronald Clark, Jr lurks deep.
In alot of his posts looking for "soul mates" - Clark intimates his "innocence". He speaks of his death sentence as though it was his only murder conviction. I'm here to tell you IT IS NOT.
Anyone who contributes to or entertains his rants might want to consider the others incarcerated who would benefit from our insight and possibly our support.
BTB has alot of inmates who have very actionable cases...whose lives may very well be changed by public demonstration.
Personally, I'm going to assist those who have a chance. To throw good money after bad is not my idea of support. I want to help those who have a chance at life.
Who´s now telling the truth - him or Josie - is, of course, something I can´t judge.
I agree that in the free world a young man would not have married a woman who is 20 years older than him (at least not because of love).
It was probably a little naive of her to obviously believe otherwise.
About circling around the comments left....
well, one may like it or not, like the contents of the answers or not, but I do think he has got the right to answer, just as the commenters have the right to answer his blog entries.
(Especially the tone is somehow different than usually. Sounds more like constructive criticizing than in the past.)