The institutional "Instruction Manual" for legal Murder begins with established authority.
Established authority require a set of the description of offenses that would make one death eligible. Throughout history, this method continues to be the foundational structural model for many countries, states, and cultures.
Inspite of the methods stability, established authorities create varrying death eligible offense list conclusive to era, and or legislative body inclusion, and even sometimes exclusion, for example, in California, being a witch, or being accused of being a witch is not a death eligible offence, oooh but not long ago, in many states witches was killed by those who established themselves as having authority to do so.
Charges against Jesus, had to meet the standard of death eligibility before people could focus on the person on the cross, the method of execution at that time. So when the word blasphemy was used, the priest had somebody to focus on the cross, when the Romans used the words King of the Jews, the politicians had someone for the people to focus on, on the cross.
By default, it forced the people not to focus on the systematic overthrow of the underclass, a scheme to silence the people, hidden in plain sight, and what exactly does that look like in real time?
Matthew 26 verse 59 states clearly that:
"Now the chief priest, the elders, and all the council sought false testimony against Jesus to put Him to death."
No fact finders, not even evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, and the truth is automatically disqualified when this 33 year old young man was brought before chief priest, elders, and all the council that only sought false testimony to put Him to death.
That verse has been in the bible for anyone to see, yet, the people are now by default, forced to focus on the person on the cross, and not the unjustified manner, in which landed Him there, and by this full proof method, established authorities can legally kill anybody they want to kill.
Culture is what people do, Jesus did what He did due to the spiritual and cultural birthrite context modality of conduct, especially conduct that others view falsely. Why death? Why not prison time, why not hard labor, why not lashes, or house arrest, why not be forbidden to teach, why not a lesser charge? Even on false pretense, why death? Why give this young man the death penalty?
How young people must feel when they look into a situation where false testimony is sought by elders, priest and counsel to put them to death, merging street level offenses, even self destructive cultural mischief in the same lane, manner of intent, with worst of the worst language?
Brought a lot of childhood memories back reading this .have just ordered The grass beneath his feet from Amazon cant wait to read this ,have read all about your case and do not understand how you could be convicted for 2 murders. Dont understand how a first world country like America can still have the death penalty ,glad I live in Scotland ,hope you have a good lawyer now and plenty of support from family and friends .keep writing in this blog I enjoy reading these. Helen
This is such an important message that you are bringing up that so many people overlook. I agree, I see it happen often with adults too unknowingly and if we all practiced this more often, people are likely to feel more comfortable.
Thank you for sharing this story, this helped to remind me about my presence etiquitte with the people I work with and people in general.
RSS
1 XZYZST
The institutional "Instruction Manual" for legal Murder begins with established authority.
Established authority require a set of the description of offenses that would make one death eligible.
Throughout history, this method continues to be the foundational structural model for many
countries, states, and cultures.
Inspite of the methods stability, established authorities create varrying death eligible offense list
conclusive to era, and or legislative body inclusion, and even sometimes exclusion, for example, in
California, being a witch, or being accused of being a witch is not a death eligible offence, oooh but
not long ago, in many states witches was killed by those who established themselves as having
authority to do so.
Charges against Jesus, had to meet the standard of death eligibility before people could focus on the
person on the cross, the method of execution at that time. So when the word blasphemy was used, the
priest had somebody to focus on the cross, when the Romans used the words King of the Jews, the
politicians had someone for the people to focus on, on the cross.
By default, it forced the people not to focus on the systematic overthrow of the underclass, a
scheme to silence the people, hidden in plain sight, and what exactly does that look like in real time?
Matthew 26 verse 59 states clearly that:
"Now the chief priest, the elders, and all the council sought false testimony against Jesus to put Him
to death."
No fact finders, not even evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, and the truth is automatically
disqualified when this 33 year old young man was brought before chief priest, elders, and all
the council that only sought false testimony to put Him to death.
That verse has been in the bible for anyone to see, yet, the people are now by default, forced to focus
on the person on the cross, and not the unjustified manner, in which landed Him there, and by this
full proof method, established authorities can legally kill anybody they want to kill.
Culture is what people do, Jesus did what He did due to the spiritual and cultural birthrite context
modality of conduct, especially conduct that others view falsely. Why death? Why not prison time,
why not hard labor, why not lashes, or house arrest, why not be forbidden to teach, why not a
lesser charge? Even on false pretense, why death? Why give this young man the death penalty?
How young people must feel when they look into a situation where false testimony is sought by elders,
priest and counsel to put them to death, merging street level offenses, even self destructive
cultural mischief in the same lane, manner of intent, with worst of the worst language?
Carol D
Dont understand how a first world country like America can still have the death penalty ,glad I live in Scotland ,hope you have a good lawyer now and plenty of support from family and friends .keep writing in this blog I enjoy reading these. Helen
This is such an important message that you are bringing up that so many people overlook. I agree, I see it happen often with adults too unknowingly and if we all practiced this more often, people are likely to feel more comfortable.
Thank you for sharing this story, this helped to remind me about my presence etiquitte with the people I work with and people in general.
<3