The very creation of Special Circumstance #22 not only made inner city youth death eligible as a direct response to environment toxicity of the influx of drugs, and weapons conveniently distributed by easy access to street level gang culture of inner city youth with intent to specifically inflate said conditions so to the point where arrest were granted.
False testimonies of the bravado hyper masculine young brain claiming full responsibility of starting gang culture, creators of caos, owners of ships, cargo, ports, train cars and operative control of where the weapon packed train cars will stop, roll back, stop, roll forward, and stop again long enough for each street gang had exclusive access to the very self destructive weapons and materials that was used as evidence to create mass incarceration.
This systematic overthrow of the underclass is often played against young people as "choice", so I say to society:
"It is therefore impossible to make a choice that doesn't exist."
Nobody is taking responsibility for providing the choices in the first place, choices by the way that established authorities have made death eligible by way of Special Circumstance #22.
Being found guilty is a lot different than being made guilty. It's all false testimony by design of those that create what is sought to put inner city youth to death, as the people are now forced to focus on the person on death row, and not the scheme designed to put them there.
There exist no evidence, that established authorities designed opportunities, and created choices to influence, entice, incite child molesters to rape children and create mass incarceration, build more prisons, and cause the condemned population to explode to nearly 800 prisoners in the state of California, are you getting this?
Same can be said for the slasher serial killer, or the people that bomb buildings, churches, or use airplanes to kill people, the special circumstances list never included drugs and murder until Don Novey and his legislative lobbyist sought to create Special Circumstance #22 penal code, and Penal Code §186.21, and §186.20. the California Street Terrorism Enforcement and Prevention Act, yes, after and during Don Novey's creation of combining the youth authority supervisors, and parole officers, with prison guards which increased the California Department of Correction budget from $923 million in 1985 to $ 5,7 billion in 2004.
In 1985 California had 13 state prisons, by 1995, just 10 years later, California had 31 state prisons, Don Novey and his lobbyists convinced the legislative body to pass penal code §186.20, and §186.21 in 1988, and special circumstance #22 in 1989, passed by voters that makes street gang killings death eligible.
The institutional "Instruction Manual" for legal Murder begins with established authority.
Established authority require a set of the description of offenses that would make one death eligible. Throughout history, this method continues to be the foundational structural model for many countries, states, and cultures.
Inspite of the methods stability, established authorities create varrying death eligible offense list conclusive to era, and or legislative body inclusion, and even sometimes exclusion, for example, in California, being a witch, or being accused of being a witch is not a death eligible offence, oooh but not long ago, in many states witches was killed by those who established themselves as having authority to do so.
Charges against Jesus, had to meet the standard of death eligibility before people could focus on the person on the cross, the method of execution at that time. So when the word blasphemy was used, the priest had somebody to focus on the cross, when the Romans used the words King of the Jews, the politicians had someone for the people to focus on, on the cross.
By default, it forced the people not to focus on the systematic overthrow of the underclass, a scheme to silence the people, hidden in plain sight, and what exactly does that look like in real time?
Matthew 26 verse 59 states clearly that:
"Now the chief priest, the elders, and all the council sought false testimony against Jesus to put Him to death."
No fact finders, not even evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, and the truth is automatically disqualified when this 33 year old young man was brought before chief priest, elders, and all the council that only sought false testimony to put Him to death.
That verse has been in the bible for anyone to see, yet, the people are now by default, forced to focus on the person on the cross, and not the unjustified manner, in which landed Him there, and by this full proof method, established authorities can legally kill anybody they want to kill.
Culture is what people do, Jesus did what He did due to the spiritual and cultural birthrite context modality of conduct, especially conduct that others view falsely. Why death? Why not prison time, why not hard labor, why not lashes, or house arrest, why not be forbidden to teach, why not a lesser charge? Even on false pretense, why death? Why give this young man the death penalty?
How young people must feel when they look into a situation where false testimony is sought by elders, priest and counsel to put them to death, merging street level offenses, even self destructive cultural mischief in the same lane, manner of intent, with worst of the worst language?
Brought a lot of childhood memories back reading this .have just ordered The grass beneath his feet from Amazon cant wait to read this ,have read all about your case and do not understand how you could be convicted for 2 murders. Dont understand how a first world country like America can still have the death penalty ,glad I live in Scotland ,hope you have a good lawyer now and plenty of support from family and friends .keep writing in this blog I enjoy reading these. Helen
This is such an important message that you are bringing up that so many people overlook. I agree, I see it happen often with adults too unknowingly and if we all practiced this more often, people are likely to feel more comfortable.
Thank you for sharing this story, this helped to remind me about my presence etiquitte with the people I work with and people in general.
RSS
direct response to environment toxicity of the influx of drugs, and weapons conveniently
distributed by easy access to street level gang culture of inner city youth with intent
to specifically inflate said conditions so to the point where arrest were granted.
False testimonies of the bravado hyper masculine young brain claiming full responsibility of starting
gang culture, creators of caos, owners of ships, cargo, ports, train cars and operative control of
where the weapon packed train cars will stop, roll back, stop, roll forward, and stop again long enough
for each street gang had exclusive access to the very self destructive weapons and materials that was
used as evidence to create mass incarceration.
This systematic overthrow of the underclass is often played against young people as "choice", so
I say to society:
"It is therefore impossible to make a choice that doesn't exist."
Nobody is taking responsibility for providing the choices in the first place, choices by the way that
established authorities have made death eligible by way of Special Circumstance #22.
Being found guilty is a lot different than being made guilty. It's all false testimony by design of
those that create what is sought to put inner city youth to death, as the people are now forced to
focus on the person on death row, and not the scheme designed to put them there.
There exist no evidence, that established authorities designed opportunities, and created choices to
influence, entice, incite child molesters to rape children and create mass incarceration, build
more prisons, and cause the condemned population to explode to nearly 800 prisoners in the
state of California, are you getting this?
Same can be said for the slasher serial killer, or the people that bomb buildings, churches, or
use airplanes to kill people, the special circumstances list never included drugs and murder until
Don Novey and his legislative lobbyist sought to create Special Circumstance #22 penal code, and
Penal Code §186.21, and §186.20. the California Street Terrorism Enforcement and Prevention Act,
yes, after and during Don Novey's creation of combining the youth authority supervisors, and parole
officers, with prison guards which increased the California Department of Correction budget from
$923 million in 1985 to $ 5,7 billion in 2004.
In 1985 California had 13 state prisons, by 1995, just 10 years later, California had 31 state
prisons, Don Novey and his lobbyists convinced the legislative body to pass penal code §186.20,
and §186.21 in 1988, and special circumstance #22 in 1989, passed by voters that makes street
gang killings death eligible.
1 XZYZST
The institutional "Instruction Manual" for legal Murder begins with established authority.
Established authority require a set of the description of offenses that would make one death eligible.
Throughout history, this method continues to be the foundational structural model for many
countries, states, and cultures.
Inspite of the methods stability, established authorities create varrying death eligible offense list
conclusive to era, and or legislative body inclusion, and even sometimes exclusion, for example, in
California, being a witch, or being accused of being a witch is not a death eligible offence, oooh but
not long ago, in many states witches was killed by those who established themselves as having
authority to do so.
Charges against Jesus, had to meet the standard of death eligibility before people could focus on the
person on the cross, the method of execution at that time. So when the word blasphemy was used, the
priest had somebody to focus on the cross, when the Romans used the words King of the Jews, the
politicians had someone for the people to focus on, on the cross.
By default, it forced the people not to focus on the systematic overthrow of the underclass, a
scheme to silence the people, hidden in plain sight, and what exactly does that look like in real time?
Matthew 26 verse 59 states clearly that:
"Now the chief priest, the elders, and all the council sought false testimony against Jesus to put Him
to death."
No fact finders, not even evidence beyond a reasonable doubt, and the truth is automatically
disqualified when this 33 year old young man was brought before chief priest, elders, and all
the council that only sought false testimony to put Him to death.
That verse has been in the bible for anyone to see, yet, the people are now by default, forced to focus
on the person on the cross, and not the unjustified manner, in which landed Him there, and by this
full proof method, established authorities can legally kill anybody they want to kill.
Culture is what people do, Jesus did what He did due to the spiritual and cultural birthrite context
modality of conduct, especially conduct that others view falsely. Why death? Why not prison time,
why not hard labor, why not lashes, or house arrest, why not be forbidden to teach, why not a
lesser charge? Even on false pretense, why death? Why give this young man the death penalty?
How young people must feel when they look into a situation where false testimony is sought by elders,
priest and counsel to put them to death, merging street level offenses, even self destructive
cultural mischief in the same lane, manner of intent, with worst of the worst language?
Carol D
Dont understand how a first world country like America can still have the death penalty ,glad I live in Scotland ,hope you have a good lawyer now and plenty of support from family and friends .keep writing in this blog I enjoy reading these. Helen
This is such an important message that you are bringing up that so many people overlook. I agree, I see it happen often with adults too unknowingly and if we all practiced this more often, people are likely to feel more comfortable.
Thank you for sharing this story, this helped to remind me about my presence etiquitte with the people I work with and people in general.
<3